Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
169 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Preserving Nature's Ledger: Blockchains in Biodiversity Conservation (2404.12086v1)

Published 18 Apr 2024 in cs.CY, cs.CE, cs.CR, cs.DC, and cs.ET

Abstract: In the contemporary era, biodiversity conservation emerges as a paramount challenge, necessitating innovative approaches to monitoring, preserving, and enhancing the natural world. This paper explores the integration of blockchain technology in biodiversity conservation, offering a novel perspective on how digital resilience can be built within ecological contexts. Blockchain, with its decentralized and immutable ledger and tokenization affordances, presents a groundbreaking solution for the accurate monitoring and tracking of environmental assets, thereby addressing the critical need for transparency and trust in conservation efforts. Unlike previous more theoretical approaches, by addressing the research question of how blockchain supports digital resilience in biodiversity conservation, this study presents a grounded framework that justifies which blockchain features are essential to decipher specific data contribution and data leveraging processes in an effort to protect our planet's biodiversity, while boosting potential economic benefits for all actors involved, from local farmers, to hardware vendors and artificial intelligence experts, to investors and regular users, volunteers and donors.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (43)
  1. Blockchain applications–usage in different domains. Ieee Access, 7:45360–45381.
  2. Blockchain networks: Data structures of bitcoin, monero, zcash, ethereum, ripple, and iota. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 12(1):e1436.
  3. Sok: Privacy-preserving computing in the blockchain era. In 2022 IEEE 7th European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P).
  4. A review of blockchain in internet of things and ai. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 4(4):28.
  5. Jumping on the blockchain bandwagon: Lessons of the past and outlook to the future. In 2016 International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2016. Association for Information Systems. AIS Electronic Library (AISeL).
  6. A taxonomy for blockchain-based decentralized physical infrastructure networks (depin). arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16707.
  7. Blockchain technology in business and information systems research.
  8. Governance in the blockchain economy: A framework and research agenda. Journal of the association for information systems, 19(10):1.
  9. Building digital resilience against major shocks. Mis Quarterly, 47(1):343–360.
  10. Global biodiversity conservation priorities. science, 313(5783):58–61.
  11. Chalkias, K. (2024). Internet transactions in sui blockchain. https://x.com/kostascrypto/status/1760191223531208754?s=20.
  12. Chapron, G. (2017). The environment needs cryptogovernance. Nature, 545(7655):403–405.
  13. Colwell, R. (2009). Biodiversity: concepts, patterns, and measurement, pages 257–263.
  14. Devarinti, S. (2016). Natural farming: Eco-friendly and sustainable? Agrotechnology, 05.
  15. Skin in the game: The transformational potential of decentralized autonomous organizations. MIS Quarterly.
  16. Ethereum Foundation (2021). What are nfts? https://ethereum.org/en/nft/.
  17. Introducing platform ecosystem resilience: leveraging mobility platforms and their ecosystems for the new normal during covid-19. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(3):304–321.
  18. easurement and monitoring for redd+: The needs, current technological capabilities, and future potential. Center for Global Development Working Paper, (392).
  19. Conceptualising the link between information systems and resilience: A developing country field study. Information Systems Journal, 29(1):70–96.
  20. Cryptocarbon: The promises and pitfalls of forest protection on a blockchain. Geoforum, 100:1–9.
  21. Generalized proof of liabilities. CCS ’21, page 3465–3486, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.
  22. We aim to prove that the amazon is more valuable alive than dead. https://gulfnews.com/business/markets/we-aim-to-prove-that-the-amazon-is-more-valuable-alive-than-dead-one-amazons-knez-1.1704267850710.
  23. Lang, C. (2023). One amazon 1 trillion usd plan for the amazon basin. https://reddmonitor.substack.com/p/one-amazons-us1-trillion-plan-for.
  24. Understanding the digital resilience of physicians during the covid-19 pandemic: An empirical study. MIS Quarterly, 47(1).
  25. Blockchain governance—a new way of organizing collaborations? Organization Science, 32(2):500–521.
  26. Disruptive technologies for environment and health research: An overview of artificial intelligence, blockchain, and internet of things. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(20).
  27. Performance evaluation of permissioned blockchain platforms. In 2020 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Computer Science and Data Engineering (CSDE), pages 1–8. IEEE.
  28. Internet of things for wetland conservation using helium network: Experience and analysis. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Internet of Things, pages 143–146.
  29. Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system.
  30. Nguyen, Q. K. (2016). Blockchain-a financial technology for future sustainable development. In 2016 3rd International conference on green technology and sustainable development (GTSD). IEEE.
  31. The value of centralized it in building resilience during crises: Evidence from us higher education’s transition to emergency remote teaching. MIS Quarterly.
  32. A taxonomy for decentralized finance. International Review of Financial Analysis, 92:103083.
  33. Sok of used cryptography in blockchain. IEEE Access, 7:148550–148575.
  34. A blockchain research framework: What we (don’t) know, where we go from here, and how we will get there. Business & information systems engineering, 59:385–409.
  35. Resilience against crises: Covid-19 and lessons from natural disasters. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(5):585–594.
  36. Digital resilience: a conceptual framework for information systems research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 24(5):1184–1198.
  37. Data is the new protein: How the commonwealth of virginia built digital resilience muscle and rebounded from opioid and covid shocks. MIS Quarterly, 47(1).
  38. UN (2023). Blockchain for biodiversity finance. https://theblockchaintest.com/uploads/resources/UN%20environment%20programme%20-%20An%20Overview%20of%20Various%20Blockchain%20Applications%20to%20Help%20Increase%20Biodiversity%20Funding.pdf.
  39. Crypto collectibles, museum funding and openglam: Challenges, opportunities and the potential of non-fungible tokens (nfts). Applied Sciences, 11(21).
  40. Veea (2014). Iot toolkit. https://x.com/kostascrypto/status/1760191223531208754?s=20.
  41. Wood, G. et al. (2014). Ethereum: A secure decentralised generalised transaction ledger. Ethereum project yellow paper, 151(2014):1–32.
  42. WWF (2021). How many species are we losing? https://wwf.panda.org/discover/our_focus/biodiversity/biodiversity/.
  43. An overview on smart contracts: Challenges, advances and platforms. Future Generation Computer Systems, 105:475–491.
Citations (1)

Summary

  • The paper presents a framework that leverages blockchain’s decentralization, transparency, and smart contract features to support global biodiversity conservation.
  • It details how smart contracts and tokenization create financial incentives that streamline conservation funding and stakeholder engagement.
  • The study advocates a digital resilience approach by integrating IoT data with blockchain to promote secure, transparent, and effective biodiversity data management.

Blockchain Applications in Biodiversity Conservation: A Digital Resilience Perspective

Introduction to the Study

The paper explores the integration of blockchain technology in supporting biodiversity conservation efforts, particularly through fostering digital resilience. The research underscores the pivotal role of blockchain characteristics such as decentralization, transparency, and smart contract capabilities in enhancing global and local conservation strategies. The paper explores the technological advancements in blockchain that can substantiate conservation, not just in theory but through tangible applications.

Key Blockchain Features for Conservation

The pivotal features of blockchain discussed in the paper are analyzed for their potential in conservation efforts:

  • Decentralization: Supports international collaborations without centralized control, crucial for cross-border conservation initiatives.
  • Transparency and Immutability: Ensures that conservation records are permanently accessible and unalterable, enhancing trust and accountability.
  • Smart Contracts: Automate and enforce conservation agreements and policies, which minimizes the need for intermediaries and administrative overhead.
  • Tokenization: Facilitates a novel conservation financing model by tokenizing natural assets; creating economic incentives for conservation.
  • Oracles: Vital for integrating real-world data into the blockchain, thus enabling responsive and informed conservation actions based on actual environmental data.
  • Interoperability: Allows the seamless integration of diverse data sources, crucial for a unified global conservation effort.
  • Rapid Settlement and Cost Reduction: Accelerates transactions and reduces costs in conservation funding and operations, crucial during environmental crises.
  • Privacy: Balances transparency with confidentiality, important for stakeholders requiring data privacy while participating in conservation efforts.

Proposed Framework for Digital Resilience in Conservation

The paper proposes a comprehensive framework utilizing blockchain to enhance digital resilience in biodiversity conservation. It focuses on creating a decentralised physical infrastructure network for data collection using IoT technologies like sensors, drones, and satellites. The concept of "Datafication of Biodiversity" is introduced where digital representations of natural assets are created and integrated into the blockchain.

  • Tokenization Strategies: Suggest the use of tokens not only for species but also for IoT devices, rewarding data collection and conservation activities.
  • Decentralized Governance: Through blockchain, a varied group of stakeholders can engage in conservation efforts via secure, transparent mechanisms like e-voting and smart contracts.
  • Data Leveraging Practices: Discusses creating marketplaces for biodiversity data, allowing data repurposing and the generation of AI training sets to address biodiversity threats more proactively.

Implications and Future Directions

The research positions blockchain as a transformative tool for biodiversity conservation, with implications that extend to how data is collected, shared, and utilized across global conservation networks. The ability to incentivize data generation and sharing through tokenization could revolutionize resource allocation and stakeholder engagement in conservation projects.

Future research could explore the practical challenges in implementing these blockchain applications on a global scale, such as interoperability with existing data systems, the regulatory landscape, and ensuring equitable stakeholder participation. Additionally, the development of metrics to quantify the impact of blockchain-enhanced conservation practices would support broader adoption and investment in these technologies.

Conclusion

This paper provides a critical analysis and a framework for utilizing blockchain technology in enhancing digital resilience for biodiversity conservation. It validates the potential for blockchain to support significant environmental challenges while also highlighting the importance of further empirical studies to move from theoretical models to practical implementations. This framework not only paves the way for leveraging advanced technology in conservation efforts but also opens up discussions on digital ethics and the governance of decentralized networks in the environmental context.