Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
140 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

On the Geometry of N=2 Minkowski Vacua of Gauged N=2 Supergravity Theories in Four Dimensions (2404.11655v3)

Published 17 Apr 2024 in hep-th

Abstract: Gauging isometries of four-dimensional N=2 supergravity theories yields an N=2 supersymmetric theory with a scalar potential. In this note, we study the well-known constraints for four-dimensional N=2 Minkowski vacua of such theories. We propose that classically a projective special K\"ahler submanifold of the projective K\"ahler target space of the ungauged theory describes the moduli space of the complex scalar fields of massless vector multiplets for N=2 Minkowski vacua configurations, which then receives quantum corrections from integrating out massive fields. Subloci of projective special K\"ahler manifolds appear as supersymmetric flux vacua in the context of type IIB Calabi-Yau threefold compactifications with background fluxes as well. While these flux vacua equations arise from the critical locus of an N=1 superpotential, we show that these equations can also be obtained from the N=2 supersymmetric Minkowski vacuum equations of gauged N=2 supergravity theories upon gauging suitable isometries in the semi-classical universal hypermultiplet sector of type IIB string Calabi-Yau threefold compactifications. Thus, we give an intrinsic N=2 supersymmetric interpretation to the flux vacua equations.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (25)
  1. M. Bodner and A. C. Cadavid, Class. Quant. Grav. 7, 829 (1990).
  2. S. Cecotti, Commun. Math. Phys. 131, 517 (1990).
  3. S. Ferrara and S. Sabharwal, Nucl. Phys. B 332, 317 (1990).
  4. A. Klemm and P. Mayr, Nucl. Phys. B 469, 37 (1996), arXiv:hep-th/9601014 .
  5. B. R. Greene and M. R. Plesser, Nucl. Phys. B 338, 15 (1990).
  6. R. Schimmrigk, JHEP 09, 061 (2020), arXiv:2003.01056 [hep-th] .
  7. I. Brunner and K. Hori, JHEP 11, 005 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0303135 .
  8. T. W. Grimm and J. Louis, Nucl. Phys. B 699, 387 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0403067 .
  9. P. Mayr, Nucl. Phys. B 593, 99 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0003198 .
  10. J. Louis and A. Micu, Nucl. Phys. B 635, 395 (2002), arXiv:hep-th/0202168 .
  11. H. Samtleben, Class. Quant. Grav. 25, 214002 (2008), arXiv:0808.4076 [hep-th] .
  12. T. R. Taylor and C. Vafa, Phys. Lett. B 474, 130 (2000), arXiv:hep-th/9912152 .
  13. G. W. Moore,   (1998a), arXiv:hep-th/9807056 .
  14. G. W. Moore,   (1998b), arXiv:hep-th/9807087 .
  15. P. A. Griffiths, Amer. J. Math. 90, 568 (1968a).
  16. P. A. Griffiths, Amer. J. Math. 90, 805 (1968b).
  17. P. A. Griffiths, Inst. Hautes Études Sci. Publ. Math. , 125 (1970).
  18. N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 426, 19 (1994a), [Erratum: Nucl.Phys.B 430, 485–486 (1994)], arXiv:hep-th/9407087 .
  19. N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 431, 484 (1994b), arXiv:hep-th/9408099 .
  20. S. Alexandrov, Phys. Rept. 522, 1 (2013), arXiv:1111.2892 [hep-th] .
  21. E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 474, 343 (1996), arXiv:hep-th/9604030 .
  22. P. Berglund and P. Mayr, JHEP 01, 114 (2013), arXiv:hep-th/0504058 .
  23. S. V. Ketov, Nucl. Phys. B 604, 256 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0102099 .
  24. A. Strominger, Phys. Lett. B 421, 139 (1998), arXiv:hep-th/9706195 .
  25. A.-K. Kashani-Poor and A. Tomasiello, Nucl. Phys. B 728, 135 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0505208 .
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.