Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
126 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Testing Intersectingness of Uniform Families (2404.11504v2)

Published 17 Apr 2024 in cs.DS

Abstract: A set family ${\cal F}$ is called intersecting if every two members of ${\cal F}$ intersect, and it is called uniform if all members of ${\cal F}$ share a common size. A uniform family ${\cal F} \subseteq \binom{[n]}{k}$ of $k$-subsets of $[n]$ is $\varepsilon$-far from intersecting if one has to remove more than $\varepsilon \cdot \binom{n}{k}$ of the sets of ${\cal F}$ to make it intersecting. We study the property testing problem that given query access to a uniform family ${\cal F} \subseteq \binom{[n]}{k}$, asks to distinguish between the case that ${\cal F}$ is intersecting and the case that it is $\varepsilon$-far from intersecting. We prove that for every fixed integer $r$, the problem admits a non-adaptive two-sided error tester with query complexity $O(\frac{\ln n}{\varepsilon})$ for $\varepsilon \geq \Omega( (\frac{k}{n})r)$ and a non-adaptive one-sided error tester with query complexity $O(\frac{\ln k}{\varepsilon})$ for $\varepsilon \geq \Omega( (\frac{k2}{n})r)$. The query complexities are optimal up to the logarithmic terms. For $\varepsilon \geq \Omega( (\frac{k2}{n})2)$, we further provide a non-adaptive one-sided error tester with optimal query complexity of $O(\frac{1}{\varepsilon})$. Our findings show that the query complexity of the problem behaves differently from that of testing intersectingness of non-uniform families, studied recently by Chen, De, Li, Nadimpalli, and Servedio (ITCS, 2024).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (15)
  1. On the maximum degree of induced subgraphs of the Kneser graph. arXiv, abs/2312.06370, 2023.
  2. Testing intersecting and union-closed families. In Proc. of the 15th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS’24), pages 33:1–33:23, 2024.
  3. I. Dinur and E. Friedgut. Intersecting families are essentially contained in juntas. Comb. Probab. Comput., 18(1–2):107–122, 2009.
  4. Intersection theorems for systems of finite sets. Quart. J. Math., 12(1):313–320, 1961.
  5. E. Fischer. A basic lower bound for property testing. arXiv, abs/2403.04999, 2024.
  6. P. Frankl and A. Kupavskii. Maximal degrees in subgraphs of Kneser graphs. arXiv, abs/2004.08718, 2020.
  7. E. Friedgut and O. Regev. Kneser graphs are like Swiss cheese. Discrete Analysis, 2:1–18, 2018.
  8. O. Goldreich. Introduction to Property Testing. Cambridge University Press, 2017.
  9. M. Kneser. Aufgabe 360. Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung, 58(2):27, 1955.
  10. L. Lovász. Kneser’s conjecture, chromatic number, and homotopy. J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A, 25(3):319–324, 1978.
  11. C. McDiarmid. Concentration. In Probabilistic methods for algorithmic discrete mathematics, volume 16 of Algorithms Combin., pages 195–248. Springer, Berlin, 1998.
  12. Kneser graphs are Hamiltonian. In Proc. of the 55th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC’23), pages 963–970, 2023.
  13. Tolerant property testing and distance approximation. J. Comput. Syst. Sci., 72(6):1012–1042, 2006.
  14. R. Tell. A note on tolerant testing with one-sided error. In Computational Complexity and Property Testing – On the Interplay Between Randomness and Computation, pages 173–177. 2020.
  15. A. C. Yao. Probabilistic computations: Toward a unified measure of complexity (extended abstract). In Proc. of the 18th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS’77), pages 222–227, 1977.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com