Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Optimal reinsurance in a dynamic contagion model: comparing self-exciting and externally-exciting risks

Published 17 Apr 2024 in math.OC and q-fin.MF | (2404.11482v2)

Abstract: We investigate the optimal reinsurance problem in a risk model with jump clustering features. This modeling framework is inspired by the concept initially proposed in Dassios and Zhao (2011), combining Hawkes and Cox processes with shot noise intensity models. Specifically, these processes describe self-exciting and externally excited jumps in the claim arrival intensity, respectively. The insurer aims to maximize the expected exponential utility of terminal wealth for general reinsurance contracts and reinsurance premiums. We discuss two different methodologies: the classical stochastic control approach based on the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation and a backward stochastic differential equation (BSDE) approach. In a Markovian setting, differently from the classical HJB-approach, the BSDE method enables us to solve the problem without imposing any requirements for regularity on the associated value function. We provide a Verification Theorem in terms of a suitable BSDE driven by a two-dimensional marked point process and we prove an existence result relaying on the theory developed in Papapantoleon et al. (2018) for stochastic Lipschitz generators. After discussing the optimal strategy for general reinsurance contracts and reinsurance premiums, we provide more explicit results in some relevant cases. Finally, we provide comparison results that highlight the heightened risk stemming from the self-exciting component in contrast to the externally-excited counterpart and discuss the the monotonicity property of the value function.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (12)
  1. V. E. Beneš. Existence of optimal stochastic control laws. SIAM Journal on Control, 9(3):446–472, 1971.
  2. T. Björk and J. Grandell. Exponential inequalities for ruin probabilities in the cox case. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 1988(1-3):77–111, 1988.
  3. M. Brachetta and C. Ceci. Optimal proportional reinsurance and investment for stochastic factor models. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 87:15–33, 2019.
  4. Optimal reinsurance via BSDEs in a partially observable model with jump clusters. Finance and Stochastics, 2023.
  5. Optimal reinsurance-investment strategy for a dynamic contagion claim model. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 93, 206–215, 2020.
  6. Stackelberg reinsurance chain under model ambiguity. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 1–32, 2023.
  7. A. Dassios and H. Zhao. A dynamic contagion process. Advances in Applied Probabability, 43:814–846, 2011.
  8. Finite-time lundberg inequalities in the cox case. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 1993(1):17–41, 1993.
  9. A. G. Hawkes. Spectra of some self-exciting and mutually exciting point processes. Biometrika, 58(1):83–90, 1971.
  10. C. Irgens and J. Paulsen. Optimal control of risk exposure, reinsurance and investments for insurance portfolios. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 35(1):21–51, 2004.
  11. M. Mania and M. Santacroce. Exponential utility maximization under partial information. Finance and Stochastics, 14, 419–448, 2010.
  12. Existence and uniqueness results for bsde with jumps: the whole nine yards. Electronic Journal of Probabability, 23(121), 1–68, 2018.

Summary

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Tweets

Sign up for free to view the 2 tweets with 1 like about this paper.