Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
126 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

SoK: Decentralized Finance (DeFi) -- Fundamentals, Taxonomy and Risks (2404.11281v1)

Published 17 Apr 2024 in cs.CR

Abstract: Decentralized Finance (DeFi) refers to financial services that are not necessarily related to crypto-currencies. By employing blockchain for security and integrity, DeFi creates new possibilities that attract retail and institution users, including central banks. Given its novel applications and sophisticated designs, the distinction between DeFi services and understanding the risk involved is often complex. This work systematically presents the major categories of DeFi protocols that cover over 90\% of total value locked (TVL) in DeFi. It establishes a structured methodology to differentiate between DeFi protocols based on their design and architecture. Every DeFi protocol is classified into one of three groups: liquidity pools, pegged and synthetic tokens, and aggregator protocols, followed by risk analysis. In particular, we classify stablecoins, liquid staking tokens, and bridged (wrapped) assets as pegged tokens resembling similar risks. The full risk exposure of DeFi users is derived not only from the DeFi protocol design but also from how it is used and with which tokens.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (144)
  1. S. Nakamoto, “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System,” Tech. Rep., 2008. [Online]. Available: www.bitcoin.org
  2. “Statista,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.statista.com/statistics/377382/bitcoin-market-capitalization/
  3. V. Buterin, “Ethereum: A Next-Generation Smart Contract and Decentralized Application Platform.” Tech. Rep., 2014.
  4. Buterin V, “Let’s run on-chain decentralized exchanges the way we run prediction markets,” 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/55m04x/lets_run_onchain_decentralized_exchanges_the_way/
  5. H. Adams, N. Zinsmeister, M. Salem moody, u. River Keefer, and D. Robinson, “Uniswap v3 Core,” Tech. Rep., 2021.
  6. MakerDAO Team, “The DAI Stablecoin System,” Tech. Rep., 2017. [Online]. Available: https://makerdao.com/
  7. Robert Leshner and Geoffrey Hayes, “Compound: The Money Market Protocol,” Tech. Rep., 2019. [Online]. Available: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KoXEEYg4YAaPacS4dudPuFZwgAX0Swv9Yi7-iE4C5JU/edit#
  8. C. Alexander, J. Choi, H. Park, and S. Sohn, “BitMEX Bitcoin Derivatives: Price Discovery, Informational Efficiency and Hedging Effectiveness,” Tech. Rep., 2019. [Online]. Available: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3353583
  9. A. Juliano, “dYdX: A Standard for Decentralized Margin Trading and Derivatives,” Tech. Rep., 2017. [Online]. Available: http://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/052715/how-big-derivatives-market.asp
  10. “MCDEX,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.coinbase.com/price/mcdex
  11. “Perpetual Protocol,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://perp.com/
  12. “GMX,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://gmx.io/#/
  13. F. Schär, “Decentralized finance: on blockchain-and smart contract-based financial markets,” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, vol. 103, no. 2, pp. 153–174, 2021.
  14. J. R. Jensen and O. Ross, “HOW DECENTRALIZED IS THE GOVERNANCE OF BLOCKCHAIN-BASED FINANCE?” Tech. Rep., 2021. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.10096
  15. “Solana,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://solana.com/
  16. “Binance Smart Chain,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.bnbchain.org/en/smartChain
  17. “DeFi Llama,” 12 2022. [Online]. Available: https://defillama.com/
  18. “Statista DeFi Users,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1297745/defi-user-number/
  19. “Tron,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://tron.network/
  20. “DeFi Llama Chains,” 12 2022. [Online]. Available: https://defillama.com/chains
  21. “Polygon,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://polygon.technology/
  22. “Optimism,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.optimism.io/
  23. “zkSync,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://zksync.io/
  24. “starknet,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://starkware.co/starknet/
  25. “DeFi Llama Categories,” 12 2022. [Online]. Available: https://defillama.com/categories
  26. R. Auer, B. Haslhofer, S. Kitzler, P. Saggese, and F. Victor, “The Technology of Decentralized Finance (DeFi),” Tech. Rep., 2023. [Online]. Available: www.bis.org
  27. S. M. Werner, D. Perez, L. Gudgeon, A. Klages-Mundt, D. Harz, and W. J. Knottenbelt, “SoK: Decentralized Finance (DeFi),” 1 2021. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.08778
  28. F. Carapella, E. Dumas, J. Gerszten, N. Swem, and L. Wall, “Decentralized Finance (DeFi): Transformative Potential & Associated Risks,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.17016/FEDS.2022.057.
  29. J. R. Jensen, V. Von Wachter, and O. Ross, “An Introduction to Decentralized Finance (DeFi),” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.7250/csimq.2021-26.03
  30. A. Green, C. Cammilleri, J. S. Erickson, O. Seneviratne, and K. P. Bennett, “DeFi Survival Analysis: Insights into Risks and User Behaviors The Rensselaer Institute for Data Exploration and Applications Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute,” Tech. Rep., 2022. [Online]. Available: http://idea.rpi.edu
  31. A. Zutshi, A. Grilo, and T. Nodehi, “The value proposition of blockchain technologies and its impact on Digital Platforms,” Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 155, 5 2021.
  32. L. Zhou, X. Xiong, J. Ernstberger, S. Chaliasos, Z. Wang, Y. Wang, K. Qin, R. Wattenhofer, D. Song, and A. Gervais, “SoK: Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Attacks,” 8 2022. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2208.13035
  33. J. Xu, K. Paruch, S. Cousaert, and Y. Feng, “SoK: Decentralized Exchanges (DEX) with Automated Market Maker (AMM) Protocols,” 3 2021. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2103.12732
  34. S. Cousaert, J. Xu, and T. Matsui, “SoK: Yield Aggregators in DeFi,” 5 2021. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.13891
  35. J. Xu and Y. Feng, “Reap the Harvest on Blockchain: A Survey of Yield Farming Protocols,” 10 2022. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.04194
  36. L. Gudgeon, S. Werner, D. Perez, and W. J. Knottenbelt, “DeFi Protocols for Loanable Funds: Interest Rates, Liquidity and Market Efficiency,” in AFT 2020 - Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Conference on Advances in Financial Technologies.   Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, 10 2020, pp. 92–112.
  37. D. Bullmann, J. Klemm, and A. Pinna, “Occasional Paper Series In search for stability in crypto-assets: are stablecoins the solution?” Tech. Rep., 2019.
  38. A. Moin, E. G. Sirer, and K. Sekniqi, “A Classification Framework for Stablecoin Designs,” 9 2019. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1910.10098
  39. O. Labazova, “Towards a Framework for Evaluation of Blockchain,” Tech. Rep., 2019.
  40. M. Conti, A. Gangwal, and M. Todero, “Blockchain trilemma solver algorand has dilemma over undecidable messages,” in ACM International Conference Proceeding Series.   Association for Computing Machinery, 8 2019.
  41. A. Gangwal, H. R. Gangavalli, and A. Thirupathi, “A Survey of Layer-Two Blockchain Protocols,” 4 2022. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.08032
  42. “L2Beat Bridges TVL,” 12 2022. [Online]. Available: https://l2beat.com/bridges/tvl
  43. “Arbitrum,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arbitrum.io/
  44. “Binance - Cryptocurrency Exchange,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.binance.com/en
  45. “Kraken Cryptocurrency Exchange,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.kraken.com/
  46. K. Qin, L. Zhou, B. Livshits, and A. Gervais, “Attacking the DeFi Ecosystem with Flash Loans for Fun and Profit,” 3 2020. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2003.03810
  47. K. Qin, L. Zhou, Y. Afonin, L. Lazzaretti, and A. Gervais, “CeFi vs. DeFi – Comparing Centralized to Decentralized Finance,” 6 2021. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.08157
  48. “FTX Dossier ,” Crypto Valley Journal, 11 2022. [Online]. Available: https://cvj.ch/en/focus/background/ftx-dossier/
  49. W. Warren and A. Bandeali, “0x: An open protocol for decentralized exchange on the Ethereum blockchain,” Tech. Rep., 2017.
  50. “Aave - Protocol Whitepaper V1.0,” Tech. Rep., 2020.
  51. “Liquity,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.liquity.org/
  52. “Wrapped Bitcoins,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://wbtc.network/
  53. S. Cousaert, J. Xu, and T. Matsui, “SoK: Yield Aggregators in DeFi,” in IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency, ICBC 2022.   Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2022.
  54. P. Freni, E. Ferro, and R. Moncada, “Tokenomics and blockchain tokens: A design-oriented morphological framework,” Blockchain: Research and Applications, vol. 3, no. 1, 3 2022.
  55. S. Lin, Y. Kong, and S. Nie, “Overview of Block Chain Cross Chain Technology,” in Proceedings - 2021 13th International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation, ICMTMA 2021.   Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 1 2021, pp. 357–360.
  56. “Cosmos,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://cosmos.network/
  57. “Polakdot,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://polkadot.network/
  58. H. Inzirillo and S. de Quenetain, “Managing Risk in DeFi Portfolios,” 5 2022. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.14699
  59. T. Ankenbrand, D. Bieri, R. Cortivo, J. Hoehener, and T. Hardjono, “Proposal for a Comprehensive (Crypto) Asset Taxonomy,” in Proceedings - 2020 Crypto Valley Conference on Blockchain Technology, CVCBT 2020.   Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 6 2020, pp. 16–26.
  60. A. Rahman, V. Shi, M. Ding, and E. Choi, “Systematization of Knowledge: Synthetic Assets, Derivatives, and On-Chain Portfolio Management,” 9 2022. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.09958
  61. Fernando J, “Derivatives: Types, Considerations, and Pros and Cons,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/derivative.asp
  62. Bajpai P, “Cryptocurrency Future,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/012215/how-invest-bitcoin-exchange-futures.asp
  63. S. Scharnowski and H. Jahanshahloo, “Liquid Staking: Basis Determinants and Price Discovery,” Tech. Rep., 2022. [Online]. Available: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4180341
  64. “A wrap-up on designing liquid staking protocols:,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://twitter.com/FigmentCapital/status/1567324278906933250
  65. “Lido: Ethereum Liquid Staking Whitepaper,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://lido.fi/static/Lido:Ethereum-Liquid-Staking.pdf
  66. “RocketPool,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://docs.rocketpool.net/guides/staking/overview.html
  67. “Marinade,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://docs.marinade.finance/
  68. “CoinBase cbETH Whitepaper,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.coinbase.com/cbeth/whitepaper
  69. “StakeWise,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://docs.stakewise.io/
  70. “What Are Blockchain Bridges, and Why are they Important for DeFi?” 2021. [Online]. Available: https://blog.makerdao.com/what-are-blockchain-bridges-and-why-are-they-important-for-defi/
  71. A. Zamyatin, D. Harz, J. Lind, P. Panayiotou, A. Gervais, and W. Knottenbelt, “XCLAIM: Trustless, Interoperable, Cryptocurrency-Backed Assets,” Tech. Rep., 2019. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8835387
  72. S. Haque, Z. Eberhart, A. Bansal, and C. McMillan, “Semantic Similarity Metrics for Evaluating Source Code Summarization,” in IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension, vol. 2022-March.   IEEE Computer Society, 2022, pp. 36–47.
  73. P. Mccorry, C. Buckland, B. Yee, and D. Song, “SoK: Validating Bridges as a Scaling Solution for Blockchains,” Tech. Rep., 2021. [Online]. Available: https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/1589
  74. T. Hardjono, “Blockchain Gateways, Bridges and Delegated Hash-Locks,” 2 2021. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.03933
  75. G. Wang, “SoK: Exploring Blockchains Interoperability,” Tech. Rep., 2021. [Online]. Available: https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/537
  76. P. Lafourcade and M. Lombard-Platet, “About Blockchain Interoperability,” Tech. Rep., 2020. [Online]. Available: https://eprint.iacr.org/2020/643
  77. D. Stone, “Trustless, privacy-preserving blockchain bridges,” 2 2021. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2102.04660
  78. G. Caldarelli, “Wrapping trust for interoperability: A preliminary study of wrapped tokens,” 1 2022.
  79. S.-S. Lee, A. Murashkin, M. Derka, and J. Gorzny, “SoK: Not Quite Water Under the Bridge: Review of Cross-Chain Bridge Hacks,” 10 2022. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2210.16209
  80. R. Zarick, B. Pellegrino, and C. Banister, “Delta: Solving the Bridging Trilemma,” Tech. Rep., 2021.
  81. P. Mell, “Understanding Stablecoin Technology and Related Security Considerations,” National Institute of Standards and Technology, Tech. Rep., 2022. [Online]. Available: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ir/2022/NIST.IR.8408.ipd.pdf
  82. “Ampleforth,” 2023.
  83. “Terra,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.terra.money/
  84. “Circle USD Coin,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.circle.com/en/usdc
  85. Y. Kwon, J. Kim, Y. Kim, D. Song, W. thank Yang-yim Heo, H. Oh, K.-n. Koo, S. Lee, Y. Kim, C. Kwon, T. Lee, Y. Jo, F. Santos, J. Kim, H. Su Roh, Y. Choi, and S. Jeong, “The Trilemma of Stablecoin,” Tech. Rep., 2021. [Online]. Available: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3917430
  86. “CoinGecko,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.coingecko.com/
  87. D. Chaum, C. Grothoff, and T. Moser, “How to issue a central bank digital currency; How to issue a central bank digital currency,” Tech. Rep., 2021.
  88. J. Chiu, E. Ozdenoren, K. Yuan, and S. Zhang, “On the Fragility of DeFi Lending,” Tech. Rep., 2022. [Online]. Available: https://g20.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/FSB-Report-on-Assessment-of-Risks-to-Financial-
  89. K. Saengchote, “Decentralized lending and its users: Insights from Compound,” Tech. Rep., 2022. [Online]. Available: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3925344
  90. A. Lehar and C. A. Parlour, “Systemic Fragility in Decentralized Markets,” Tech. Rep., 2022. [Online]. Available: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4164833
  91. D. Perez, S. M. Werner, J. Xu, and B. Livshits, “Liquidations: DeFi on a Knife-edge,” 9 2020. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.13235http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-64331-0_24
  92. “DDEX,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://ddex.io/
  93. A. Sardon, “Zero-Liquidation Loans: A Structured Product Approach to DeFi Lending,” 10 2021. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.13533
  94. Saradon A., “MYSO v1 Core A Trust-Minimized Protocol for Zero-Liquidation Loans,” Tech. Rep., 2022. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/mysofinance/v1-core-whitepaper/blob/main/MYSO_v1___Whitepaper.pdf
  95. R. Ngo, “Timeswap First Fully Decentralized AMM based Money Market Protocol,” Tech. Rep., 2021. [Online]. Available: https://timeswap.io/whitepaper.pdf
  96. “Vendor Finance,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://docs.vendor.finance/overview/what-is-vendor-finance
  97. Baker Lucas, “Paradigms for on chain credit,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://jumpcrypto.com/paradigms-for-on-chain-credit/
  98. “NFTFi,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.nftfi.com/
  99. “BendDAO,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.benddao.xyz/en/
  100. L. X. Lin, “DECONSTRUCTING DECENTRALIZED EXCHANGES,” Tech. Rep., 2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.airswap.io
  101. R. Hanson, “Logarithmic Market Scoring Rules for Modular Combinatorial Information Aggregation,” Tech. Rep., 2002. [Online]. Available: http://hanson.gmu.edu
  102. G. Angeris, A. Evans, and T. Chitra, “A Note on Bundle Profit Maximization,” Tech. Rep., 2021.
  103. M. Neuder, R. Rao, D. J. Moroz, and D. C. Parkes, “Strategic Liquidity Provision in Uniswap v3,” 6 2021. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.12033
  104. M. N. Martinelli F, “Balancer Whitepaper: A non-custodial portfolio manager, liquidity provider, and price sensor.” 2019.
  105. M. Egorov, “StableSwap - efficient mechanism for Stablecoin liquidity,” Tech. Rep., 2019.
  106. ——, “Curve Whitepaper: Automatic market-making with dynamic peg,” Tech. Rep., 2021.
  107. “Programming AMMs on top of UniV3,” Tech. Rep., 2021.
  108. L. Heimbach, E. Schertenleib, and R. Wattenhofer, “Risks and Returns of Uniswap V3 Liquidity Providers,” 5 2022. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.08904
  109. A. Lipton, A. S. Sila, and S. Bank, “Automated Market-Making for Fiat Currencies,” Tech. Rep., 2021. [Online]. Available: https://defipulse.com/uniswap,
  110. L. Heimbach, Y. Wang, and R. Wattenhofer, “Behavior of Liquidity Providers in Decentralized Exchanges,” 5 2021. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2105.13822
  111. M. Labadie, “Impermanent loss and slippage in Automated Market Makers (AMMs) with constant-product formula,” Tech. Rep., 2022. [Online]. Available: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4053924
  112. N. Tiruviluamala, A. Port, and E. Lewis, “A General Framework for Impermanent Loss in Automated Market Makers,” 3 2022. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.11352
  113. L. Zhou, K. Qin, and A. Gervais, “A2MM: Mitigating Frontrunning, Transaction Reordering and Consensus Instability in Decentralized Exchanges,” 6 2021. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.07371
  114. G. Angeris, A. Evans, T. Chitra, and S. Boyd, “Optimal Routing for Constant Function Market Makers,” in EC 2022 - Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Economics and Computation.   Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, 7 2022, pp. 115–128.
  115. “Dune DEX metrics,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://dune.com/hagaetc/dex-metrics
  116. T. A. Xu and J. Xu, “A Short Survey on Business Models of Decentralized Finance (DeFi) Protocols,” 2 2022. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.07742
  117. W. Li, J. Bu, X. Li, and X. Chen, “Security Analysis of DeFi: Vulnerabilities, Attacks and Advances,” 5 2022. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.09524
  118. H. Chen, M. Pendleton, L. Njilla, and S. Xu, “A Survey on Ethereum Systems Security: Vulnerabilities, Attacks and Defenses,” 8 2019. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1908.04507
  119. G. Tsoukalas and B. H. Falk, “Token-weighted crowdsourcing,” Management Science, vol. 66, no. 9, pp. 3843–3859, 9 2020.
  120. A. D’avernas, V. Maurin, Q. Vandeweyer, J. Abadi, M. Brunnermeier, D. Duffie, F. Gourio, Z. He, J. Li, Y. Li, S. Mayer, V. Schubert, F. Tourre, A. Tsoy, G. Viswanath-Natraj, and A. L. Zhang, “Can Stablecoins be Stable? *,” Tech. Rep., 2022. [Online]. Available: https://bfi.uchicago.edu/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/BFI_WP_2022-131.pdf
  121. P. Daian, S. Goldfeder, T. Kell, Y. Li, X. Zhao, I. Bentov, L. Breidenbach, and A. Juels, “Flash Boys 2.0: Frontrunning, Transaction Reordering, and Consensus Instability in Decentralized Exchanges,” 4 2019. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1904.05234
  122. S. Eskandari, S. Moosavi, and J. Clark, “SoK: Transparent Dishonesty: front-running attacks on Blockchain,” 2 2019. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1902.05164
  123. S. Yang, F. Zhang, K. Huang, X. Chen, Y. Yang, and F. Zhu, “SoK: MEV Countermeasures: Theory and Practice,” 12 2022. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2212.05111
  124. L. Heimbach and R. Wattenhofer, “SoK: Preventing Transaction Reordering Manipulations in Decentralized Finance,” 3 2022. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.11520
  125. G. Zyskind, O. Nathan, and A. S. Pentland, “Decentralizing privacy: Using blockchain to protect personal data,” in Proceedings - 2015 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops, SPW 2015.   Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 7 2015, pp. 180–184.
  126. “Integritee,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://integritee.network/
  127. “Secret Network,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://scrt.network/
  128. Wan X. and Adams A., “Just In Time Liquidity on the Uniswap Protocol,” 9 2022. [Online]. Available: https://blog.uniswap.org/jit-liquidity
  129. X. Xiong, Z. Wang, W. Knottenbelt, and M. Huth, “Demystifying Just-in-Time (JIT) Liquidity Attacks on Uniswap V3,” Tech. Rep. [Online]. Available: https://defillama.com/,
  130. B. Liu, P. Szalachowski, and J. Zhou, “A First Look into DeFi Oracles,” 5 2020. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.04377
  131. B. Mazorra, V. Adan, and V. Daza, “Do not rug on me: Zero-dimensional Scam Detection,” 1 2022. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2201.07220
  132. “SetProtocol,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.tokensets.com/
  133. “Enzyme,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://enzyme.finance/
  134. H. Adams, N. Zinsmeister, and D. Robinson, “Uniswap v2 Core,” Tech. Rep., 2020.
  135. “Range Order at Uniswap v3,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://docs.uniswap.org/concepts/protocol/range-orders
  136. “Oxygen,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.oxygen.org/
  137. “DeltaPrime,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://deltaprime.io/
  138. “Gearbox,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://gearbox.fi/
  139. “TrueFi,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://truefi.io/
  140. “Goldfinch,” 2023.
  141. S. Carré and F. Gabriel, “Security and Credit in Proof-of-Stake DeFi Protocols *,” Tech. Rep., 2022. [Online]. Available: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4307207
  142. T. Chitra, “Competitive Equilibria Between Staking and On-chain Lending License,” Tech. Rep., 2020. [Online]. Available: https://cryptoeconomicsystems.pubpub.org/pub/chitra-staking-lending-equilibria/release/6?readingCollection=c65922bd
  143. T. Chitra and K. Kulkarni, “Improving Proof of Stake Economic Security via MEV Redistribution,” Tech. Rep., 2022.
  144. T. Bugnet and A. Zamyatin, “XCC: Theft-Resilient and Collateral-Optimized Cryptocurrency-Backed Assets,” Tech. Rep., 2022. [Online]. Available: https://eprint.iacr.org/2022/113
Citations (2)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets