Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
134 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
10 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
47 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

WISDOM Project -- XXIV. Cross-checking supermassive black hole mass estimates from ALMA CO gas kinematics and SINFONI stellar kinematics in the galaxy NGC 4751 (2404.11260v1)

Published 17 Apr 2024 in astro-ph.GA

Abstract: Supermassive black hole (SMBH) masses can be measured by observing the impacts of the SMBHs on dynamical tracers around them. We present high angular resolution ($0.19$ arcsec or $\approx24$ pc) Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array observations of the ${12}$CO(3-2) line emission of the early-type galaxy NGC 4751, which reveal a highly-inclined regularly-rotating molecular gas disc with clear central Keplerian motions. Using a Hubble Space Telescope image to constrain the stellar mass distribution, we forward model the molecular gas kinematics and data cube in a Bayesian framework using the Kinematic Molecular Simulation code. Assuming a constant mass-to-light ratio ($M/L$), we infer a SMBH mass $M_\text{BH}=3.43{+0.45}_{-0.44}\times109$ $\text{M}\odot$ and a F160W filter stellar $M/L$ $M/L\text{F160W}=(2.68\pm0.11)$ $\text{M}\odot/\text{L}{\odot,\text{F160W}}$ (all quoted uncertainties are at $3\sigma$ confidence). Assuming a linearly spatially-varying $M/L$, we infer $M_\text{BH}=2.79_{-0.57}{+0.75}\times109$ $\text{M}\odot$ and $\left(M/L\text{F160W}\right)/\left(\text{M}\odot/\text{L}{\odot,\text{F160W}}\right)=3.07{+0.27}{-0.35}-0.09{+0.08}{-0.06}\,\left(R/\text{arcsec}\right)$, where $R$ is the galactocentric radius. We also present alternative SMBH mass estimates using the Jeans Anisotropic Modelling (JAM) method and SINFONI stellar kinematics. Assuming a cylindrically-aligned velocity ellipsoid (JAM$\text{cyl}$) we infer $M\text{BH}=(2.52\pm 0.36)\times109$ $\text{M}\odot$, while assuming a spherically-aligned velocity ellipsoid (JAM$\text{sph}$) we infer $M_\text{BH}=(3.24\pm0.87)\times109$ $\text{M}_\odot$. Our derived masses are all consistent with one another, but they are larger than (and inconsistent with) one previous stellar dynamical measurement using Schwarzschil's method and the same SINFONI kinematics.

Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com