Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Search
2000 character limit reached

Neuron Specialization: Leveraging intrinsic task modularity for multilingual machine translation

Published 17 Apr 2024 in cs.CL | (2404.11201v1)

Abstract: Training a unified multilingual model promotes knowledge transfer but inevitably introduces negative interference. Language-specific modeling methods show promise in reducing interference. However, they often rely on heuristics to distribute capacity and struggle to foster cross-lingual transfer via isolated modules. In this paper, we explore intrinsic task modularity within multilingual networks and leverage these observations to circumvent interference under multilingual translation. We show that neurons in the feed-forward layers tend to be activated in a language-specific manner. Meanwhile, these specialized neurons exhibit structural overlaps that reflect language proximity, which progress across layers. Based on these findings, we propose Neuron Specialization, an approach that identifies specialized neurons to modularize feed-forward layers and then continuously updates them through sparse networks. Extensive experiments show that our approach achieves consistent performance gains over strong baselines with additional analyses demonstrating reduced interference and increased knowledge transfer.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (44)
  1. Massively multilingual neural machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pages 3874–3884.
  2. Ali Araabi and Christof Monz. 2020. Optimizing transformer for low-resource neural machine translation. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 3429–3435.
  3. Ankur Bapna and Orhan Firat. 2019. Simple, scalable adaptation for neural machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pages 1538–1548.
  4. When is multilinguality a curse? language modeling for 250 high-and low-resource languages. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.09205.
  5. Cross-lingual transfer with language-specific subnetworks for low-resource dependency parsing. Computational Linguistics, 49(3):613–641.
  6. Examining modularity in multilingual lms via language-specialized subnetworks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.08273.
  7. Language-family adapters for low-resource multilingual neural machine translation. In Proceedings of the The Sixth Workshop on Technologies for Machine Translation of Low-Resource Languages (LoResMT 2023), pages 59–72.
  8. Unsupervised cross-lingual representation learning at scale. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 8440–8451.
  9. No language left behind: Scaling human-centered machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.04672.
  10. Brain-like functional specialization emerges spontaneously in deep neural networks. Science advances, 8(11):eabl8913.
  11. Beyond english-centric multilingual machine translation. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 22(1):4839–4886.
  12. Ntrex-128–news test references for mt evaluation of 128 languages. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Scaling Up Multilingual Evaluation, pages 21–24.
  13. Jonathan Frankle and Michael Carbin. 2018. The lottery ticket hypothesis: Finding sparse, trainable neural networks. In International Conference on Learning Representations.
  14. Gradient-based gradual pruning for language-specific multilingual neural machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 654–670.
  15. Dan Hendrycks and Kevin Gimpel. 2016. Gaussian error linear units (gelus). arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.08415.
  16. Google’s multilingual neural machine translation system: Enabling zero-shot translation. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 5:339–351.
  17. Taku Kudo and John Richardson. 2018. Sentencepiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for neural text processing. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations, pages 66–71.
  18. Investigating multilingual nmt representations at scale. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pages 1565–1575.
  19. Bloom: A 176b-parameter open-access multilingual language model.
  20. Xian Li and Hongyu Gong. 2021. Robust optimization for multilingual translation with imbalanced data. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:25086–25099.
  21. Parameter-efficient fine-tuning without introducing new latency. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 4242–4260, Toronto, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  22. Make pre-trained model reversible: From parameter to memory efficient fine-tuning. In Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems.
  23. Learning language specific sub-network for multilingual machine translation. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 293–305.
  24. fairseq: A fast, extensible toolkit for sequence modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.01038.
  25. Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 311–318.
  26. Lifting the curse of multilinguality by pre-training modular transformers. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 3479–3495.
  27. Modular deep learning. Transactions on Machine Learning Research. Survey Certification.
  28. How multilingual is multilingual bert? In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 4996–5001.
  29. Learning language-specific layers for multilingual machine translation. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 14767–14783.
  30. Maja Popović. 2017. chrf++: words helping character n-grams. In Proceedings of the second conference on machine translation, pages 612–618.
  31. Matt Post. 2018. A call for clarity in reporting bleu scores. In Proceedings of the Third Conference on Machine Translation: Research Papers, pages 186–191.
  32. Comet: A neural framework for mt evaluation. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 2685–2702.
  33. Causes and cures for interference in multilingual translation. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), Toronto, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  34. Shaomu Tan and Christof Monz. 2023. Towards a better understanding of variations in zero-shot neural machine translation performance. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 13553–13568.
  35. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30.
  36. Neurons in large language models: Dead, n-gram, positional. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.04827.
  37. Qian Wang and Jiajun Zhang. 2022. Parameter differentiation based multilingual neural machine translation. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 36, pages 11440–11448.
  38. Gradient vaccine: Investigating and improving multi-task optimization in massively multilingual models. In International Conference on Learning Representations.
  39. Beyond shared vocabulary: Increasing representational word similarities across languages for multilingual machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Singapore. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  40. Do current multi-task optimization methods in deep learning even help? Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:13597–13609.
  41. Task representations in neural networks trained to perform many cognitive tasks. Nature neuroscience, 22(2):297–306.
  42. Share or not? learning to schedule language-specific capacity for multilingual translation. In International Conference on Learning Representations.
  43. Improving massively multilingual neural machine translation and zero-shot translation. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 1628–1639.
  44. Emergent modularity in pre-trained transformers. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023, pages 4066–4083, Toronto, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Citations (5)

Summary

  • The paper introduces a neuron specialization approach that leverages intrinsic task modularity to reduce negative interference in multilingual translation.
  • It employs specialized neuron identification and sparse back-propagation to boost BLEU scores across both high- and low-resource language pairs without increasing model size.
  • Experimental results demonstrate consistent performance gains and resource efficiency, setting a new benchmark for multilingual machine translation.

Neuron Specialization: Leveraging Intrinsic Task Modularity for Multilingual Machine Translation

The paper "Neuron Specialization: Leveraging Intrinsic Task Modularity for Multilingual Machine Translation" (2404.11201) introduces a novel methodology to enhance multilingual translation models by harnessing the inherent modularity within neural networks' structure. It focuses on reducing negative interference between languages while promoting efficient knowledge transfer, especially beneficial for low-resource languages.

Background and Motivation

Multilingual Machine Translation (MMT) faces the challenge of balancing knowledge transfer and minimizing interference across languages. Traditional unified multilingual models often suffer from negative interference, where the optimization for multiple languages can derogate the performance on high-resource languages while offering limited benefits for low-resource ones. The research explores the concept of task modularity — the idea that neural networks can develop specialized neuron activations tailored to specific tasks.

Research in related fields, such as computer vision, indicates that networks inherently develop task-specific functional specialization. These findings suggest potential for similar behavior in MMT, especially within Feed-Forward Networks (FFNs), which house most parameters and can exhibit language-specific neuron activation patterns.

Neuron Structural Analysis

The paper provides an in-depth investigation into neuron behavior and specialization within the FFN layers. By examining neurons' activation patterns across various translation tasks, the authors make several critical observations:

  • Language-Specific Neuron Activation: Neurons in FFN layers exhibit activation patterns that are highly specific to individual language tasks.
  • Structural Overlaps and Language Proximity: Analysis shows that neurons exhibit structural overlaps between languages sharing linguistic proximity. These overlaps diminish across layers, indicating a transition from language-specific processing towards more universal representations in deeper layers. Figure 1

    Figure 1: Pairwise Intersection over Union (IoU) scores for specialized neurons extracted from the first decoder FFN layer across various out-of-English translation directions, highlighting overlap and language proximity.

Neuron Specialization Method

Building on these insights, the paper introduces the Neuron Specialization approach, which leverages identified specialized neurons to mitigate interference and enhance translation performance. The proposed method involves:

  • Specialized Neuron Identification: Quantifying activation frequencies of FFN neurons using validation datasets for each task, then selecting actively involved neurons based on a predefined activation threshold.
  • Sparse Network Training: By focusing updates on selected neurons, it employs a sparse back-propagation approach, efficiently enhancing task-specific parameters without increasing the model's overall size. Figure 2

    Figure 2: Sparsity progression of Neuron Specialization when k=95k=95 on the EC30 dataset, showing natural intrinsic patterns from language-specific to language-agnostic progression.

Experimental Results

Extensive experiments validate the efficacy of the Neuron Specialization method across small-scale (IWSLT) and large-scale datasets (EC30). Key findings include:

  • Consistent Performance Gains: The method provides significant BLEU score improvements across multiple languages compared to baseline multilingual models.
  • Resource Efficiency: The approach does not increase trainable parameters, making it economically viable for deployment in resource-constrained settings. Figure 3

    Figure 3: Improvements of Neuron Specialization over mT-large on EC30. The x-axis represents the factor kk, showing improvements correlated with the dynamic sparsity of the neural network layer.

Implications and Future Directions

Neuron Specialization introduces a scalable approach to enhancing multilingual translation tasks, facilitating knowledge transfer while minimizing negative cross-lingual interference. Its implications extend beyond MMT, potentially impacting other areas of natural language processing, such as sentiment analysis and language modeling, where modularity might be similarly beneficial.

Future directions could explore extending the specialized neuron framework to attention mechanisms or integrating the approach with other modular training methodologies. Further studies might also consider adapting the method to other complex AI systems beyond language-based tasks, testing its generalizability and adaptability.

Conclusion

The "Neuron Specialization" study presents a compelling case for utilizing inherent task modularity within neural networks to bolster MMT. The results affirm that leveraging structural neuron overlaps can significantly improve translation performance, achieving a fine balance between task specificity and efficiency. This work marks a step forward in overcoming multilingual interference, setting a benchmark for future explorations in AI task modularity.

Paper to Video (Beta)

Whiteboard

No one has generated a whiteboard explanation for this paper yet.

Open Problems

We haven't generated a list of open problems mentioned in this paper yet.

Authors (3)

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.