Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
139 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Simultaneous compensation of input delay and state/input quantization for linear systems via switched predictor feedback (2404.11194v3)

Published 17 Apr 2024 in math.OC, cs.SY, eess.SY, and math.AP

Abstract: We develop a switched predictor-feedback law, which achieves global asymptotic stabilization of linear systems with input delay and with the plant and actuator states available only in (almost) quantized form. The control design relies on a quantized version of the nominal predictor-feedback law for linear systems, in which quantized measurements of the plant and actuator states enter the predictor state formula. A switching strategy is constructed to dynamically adjust the tunable parameter of the quantizer (in a piecewise constant manner), in order to initially increase the range and subsequently decrease the error of the quantizers. The key element in the proof of global asymptotic stability in the supremum norm of the actuator state is derivation of solutions' estimates combining a backstepping transformation with small-gain and input-to-state stability arguments, for addressing the error due to quantization. We extend this result to the input quantization case and illustrate our theory with a numerical example.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (29)
  1. Z. Artstein. Linear systems with delayed controls: A reduction. IEEE Transactions on Automatic control, 27(4):869–879, 1982.
  2. S. Battilotti. Continuous-time and sampled-data stabilizers for nonlinear systems with input and measurement delays. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 65(4):1568–1583, 2019.
  3. N. Bekiaris-Liberis. Hybrid boundary stabilization of linear first-order hyperbolic pdes despite almost quantized measurements and control input. Systems & Control Letters, 146:104809, 2020.
  4. N. Bekiaris-Liberis and M. Krstic. Nonlinear Control Under Nonconstant Delays. SIAM, 2013.
  5. Prediction-based stabilization of linear systems subject to input-dependent input delay of integral-type. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 59(9):2385–2399, 2014.
  6. R. Brockett and D. Liberzon. Quantized feedback stabilization of linear systems. IEEE transactions on Automatic Control, 45(7):1279–1289, (2000).
  7. Predictor-based control of time-delay systems: a survey. International Journal of Systems Science, 53(12):2496–2534, 2022.
  8. M. Di Ferdinando and P. Pepe. Sampled-data emulation of dynamic output feedback controllers for nonlinear time-delay systems. Automatica, 99:120–131, 2019.
  9. On practical stability preservation under fast sampling and accurate quantization of feedbacks for nonlinear time-delay systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 66(1):314–321, 2020.
  10. On semi-global exponential stability under sampling for locally lipschitz time-delay systems. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 68(3):1508–1523, 2022.
  11. Stabilization of boundary controlled hyperbolic PDEs via Lyapunov-based event triggered sampling and quantization. In 2017 IEEE 56th Annual Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pages 1266–1271, 2017.
  12. Event-triggered predictor-based control with gain-scheduling and extended state observer for networked control systems. Information Sciences, 491:90–108, 2019.
  13. I. Karafyllis and M. Krstic. Nonlinear stabilization under sampled and delayed measurements, and with inputs subject to delay and zero-order hold. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 57(5):1141–1154, 2011.
  14. I. Karafyllis and M. Krstic. Predictor Feedback for Delay Systems: Implementations and Approximations. Springer, 2017.
  15. I. Karafyllis and M. Krstic. Sampled-data boundary feedback control of 1-d linear transport pdes with non-local terms. Systems & Control Letters, 107:68–75, 2017.
  16. I. Karafyllis and M. Krstic. Input-to-State Stability for PDEs. Springer-Verlag, London (Series: Communications and Control Engineering), 2019.
  17. R. Katz and E. Fridman. Sampled-data finite-dimensional boundary control of 1d parabolic pdes under point measurement via a novel iss halanay’s inequality. Automatica, 135:109966, 2022.
  18. M. Krstic. Delay Compensation for Nonlinear, Adaptive, and PDE Systems. Springer, 2009.
  19. D. Liberzon. Hybrid feedback stabilization of systems with quantized signals. Automatica, 39(9):1543–1554, 2003.
  20. F. Mazenc and E. Fridman. Predictor-based sampled-data exponential stabilization through continuous–discrete observers. Automatica, 63:74–81, 2016.
  21. Event-triggered control for continuous-time linear systems with a delay in the input. Systems & Control Letters, 159:105075, 2022.
  22. Event-triggered stabilization of nonlinear systems with time-varying sensing and actuation delay. Automatica, 113:108754, 2020.
  23. Attitude control of a 2-DOF helicopter system with input quantization and delay. In IECON 2022–48th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, pages 1–6.
  24. A. Selivanov and E. Fridman. Observer-based input-to-state stabilization of networked control systems with large uncertain delays. Automatica, 74:63–70, 2016.
  25. A. Selivanov and E. Fridman. Predictor-based networked control under uncertain transmission delays. Automatica, 70:101–108, 2016.
  26. Predictor-based periodic event-triggered control for nonlinear uncertain systems with input delay. Automatica, 136:110055, 2022.
  27. Input-to-state stabilization in H1superscript𝐻1{H}^{1}italic_H start_POSTSUPERSCRIPT 1 end_POSTSUPERSCRIPT-norm for boundary controlled linear hyperbolic pdes with application to quantized control. In 2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pages 3112–3117. IEEE, 2016.
  28. S. Tarbouriech and F. Gouaisbaut. Control design for quantized linear systems with saturations. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 57(7):1883–1889, 2011.
  29. J. Weston and M. Malisoff. Sequential predictors under time-varying feedback and measurement delays and sampling. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 64(7):2991–2996, 2018.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.