Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
125 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

OptiGrad: A Fair and more Efficient Price Elasticity Optimization via a Gradient Based Learning (2404.10275v1)

Published 16 Apr 2024 in cs.LG, cs.AI, cs.CY, and stat.AP

Abstract: This paper presents a novel approach to optimizing profit margins in non-life insurance markets through a gradient descent-based method, targeting three key objectives: 1) maximizing profit margins, 2) ensuring conversion rates, and 3) enforcing fairness criteria such as demographic parity (DP). Traditional pricing optimization, which heavily lean on linear and semi definite programming, encounter challenges in balancing profitability and fairness. These challenges become especially pronounced in situations that necessitate continuous rate adjustments and the incorporation of fairness criteria. Specifically, indirect Ratebook optimization, a widely-used method for new business price setting, relies on predictor models such as XGBoost or GLMs/GAMs to estimate on downstream individually optimized prices. However, this strategy is prone to sequential errors and struggles to effectively manage optimizations for continuous rate scenarios. In practice, to save time actuaries frequently opt for optimization within discrete intervals (e.g., range of [-20\%, +20\%] with fix increments) leading to approximate estimations. Moreover, to circumvent infeasible solutions they often use relaxed constraints leading to suboptimal pricing strategies. The reverse-engineered nature of traditional models complicates the enforcement of fairness and can lead to biased outcomes. Our method addresses these challenges by employing a direct optimization strategy in the continuous space of rates and by embedding fairness through an adversarial predictor model. This innovation not only reduces sequential errors and simplifies the complexities found in traditional models but also directly integrates fairness measures into the commercial premium calculation. We demonstrate improved margin performance and stronger enforcement of fairness highlighting the critical need to evolve existing pricing strategies.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (31)
  1. Minority neighborhoods pay higher car insurance premiums than white areas with the same risk. ProPublica, April, 5:2017, 2017.
  2. Ai fairness 360: An extensible toolkit for detecting, understanding, and mitigating unwanted algorithmic bias. arXiv, 1810.01943, 2018.
  3. Optimized data pre-processing for discrimination prevention. arXiv, 1704.03354, 2017.
  4. Fairness under unawareness: Assessing disparity when protected class is unobserved. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pages 339–348, 2019.
  5. E. COM. Laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (artificial intelligence act) and amending certain union legislative acts. Proposal for a regulation of the European parliament and of the council, 2021.
  6. A. De Larrard. Commercial price optimization strategies in car insurance. Insitut des actuaires, 36(2):614–645, 2016.
  7. Fairness Through Awareness. arXiv, 1104.3913, 2011. ISSN 0039-6109. doi: 10.1145/2090236.2090255. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.3913.
  8. Learning unbiased representations via rényi minimization. In Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Research Track: European Conference, ECML PKDD 2021, Bilbao, Spain, September 13–17, 2021, Proceedings, Part II 21, pages 749–764. Springer, 2021a.
  9. Fairness-aware neural rényi minimization for continuous features. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Conference on International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence, pages 2262–2268, 2021b.
  10. A fair pricing model via adversarial learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.12008, 2022.
  11. Equality of opportunity in supervised learning. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pages 3315–3323, 2016.
  12. Some mathematical aspects of price optimisation. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2018(5):379–403, 2018.
  13. Fairness in multi-task learning via wasserstein barycenters. In Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases, pages 295–312. Springer, 2023.
  14. S. Ito and R. Fujimaki. Optimization beyond prediction: Prescriptive price optimization. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, pages 1833–1841, 2017.
  15. F. Kamiran and T. Calders. Data preprocessing techniques for classification without discrimination. Knowledge and Information Systems, 33(1):1–33, 2012.
  16. Discrimination-free insurance pricing. ASTIN Bulletin: The Journal of the IAA, 52(1):55–89, 2022a.
  17. A discussion of discrimination and fairness in insurance pricing, 2022b.
  18. What is fair? proxy discrimination vs. demographic disparities in insurance pricing. Proxy Discrimination vs. Demographic Disparities in Insurance Pricing (May 2, 2023), 2023.
  19. The randomized dependence coefficient. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pages 1–9, 2013.
  20. Learning to pivot with adversarial networks. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pages 981–990, 2017.
  21. Measuring and mitigating biases in motor insurance pricing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.11900, 2023.
  22. E. Parliament and C. of the European Union. Regulation (eu) 2016/679 of the european parliament and of the council, 2016. URL https://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj.
  23. Spatial fairness: The case for its importance, limitations of existing work, and guidelines for future research. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.14040, 2024.
  24. Unisex insurance pricing: Consumers’ perception and market implications. The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, 39(2):322–350, 2014.
  25. Insurance pricing on price comparison websites via reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.06935, 2023.
  26. R. M. Verschuren. Customer price sensitivities in competitive insurance markets. Expert Systems with Applications, 202:117133, 2022.
  27. Achieving fairness through adversarial learning: an application to recidivism prediction. arXiv:1807.00199, 2018.
  28. X. Xin and F. Huang. Antidiscrimination insurance pricing: Regulations, fairness criteria, and models. North American Actuarial Journal, pages 1–35, 2023.
  29. Fairness Constraints: Mechanisms for Fair Classification. In AISTATS’17, pages 962–970, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA, 20–22 Apr 2017.
  30. Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learning. Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, jan 2018a. ISSN 15477401. doi: 10.1080/08827508.2012.738731.
  31. Mitigating unwanted biases with adversarial learning. In AAAI’18, pages 335–340, 2018b.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.