Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
60 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
8 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

SegFormer3D: an Efficient Transformer for 3D Medical Image Segmentation (2404.10156v2)

Published 15 Apr 2024 in cs.CV
SegFormer3D: an Efficient Transformer for 3D Medical Image Segmentation

Abstract: The adoption of Vision Transformers (ViTs) based architectures represents a significant advancement in 3D Medical Image (MI) segmentation, surpassing traditional Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models by enhancing global contextual understanding. While this paradigm shift has significantly enhanced 3D segmentation performance, state-of-the-art architectures require extremely large and complex architectures with large scale computing resources for training and deployment. Furthermore, in the context of limited datasets, often encountered in medical imaging, larger models can present hurdles in both model generalization and convergence. In response to these challenges and to demonstrate that lightweight models are a valuable area of research in 3D medical imaging, we present SegFormer3D, a hierarchical Transformer that calculates attention across multiscale volumetric features. Additionally, SegFormer3D avoids complex decoders and uses an all-MLP decoder to aggregate local and global attention features to produce highly accurate segmentation masks. The proposed memory efficient Transformer preserves the performance characteristics of a significantly larger model in a compact design. SegFormer3D democratizes deep learning for 3D medical image segmentation by offering a model with 33x less parameters and a 13x reduction in GFLOPS compared to the current state-of-the-art (SOTA). We benchmark SegFormer3D against the current SOTA models on three widely used datasets Synapse, BRaTs, and ACDC, achieving competitive results. Code: https://github.com/OSUPCVLab/SegFormer3D.git

Analysis of "SegFormer3D: an Efficient Transformer for 3D Medical Image Segmentation"

The paper authored by Shehan Perera et al. introduces SegFormer3D, a resource-conscious Vision Transformer (ViT) architecture designed specifically for 3D medical image segmentation. The paper offers an insightful examination regarding the nexus between deep learning architectures, specifically Vision Transformers, and the unique demands of medical image segmentation tasks. The authors propose SegFormer3D as a solution to the existing challenges posed by large and computationally intensive models in the domain.

Background and Contributions

3D medical image segmentation is a key task within the field of medical image analysis, which traditionally employs convolutional neural networks (CNNs). However, these models often struggle with capturing global contextual information due to their localized receptive fields, prompting a shift towards Transformer-based solutions, which have demonstrated superior performance by leveraging global attention mechanisms. Nevertheless, the state-of-the-art (SOTA) architectures tend to be extensive, demanding significant computational resources, and often struggle with generalization due to limited data availability within the medical field.

The core contribution of the paper is the introduction of SegFormer3D, a hierarchical Transformer that addresses these challenges by focusing on computational efficiency while maintaining competitive performance metrics. It integrates multi-scale attention calculation across volumetric features, utilizing an all-MLP decoder to efficiently handle both local and global features without the complexity of traditional Transformer decoders. SegFormer3D highlights a remarkable reduction in parameters and floating-point operations—33 times fewer parameters and a 13-fold decrease in GFLOPS compared to existing SOTA models, demonstrating its memory efficiency without significant loss in performance.

Methodology

SegFormer3D distinguishes itself through several methodological aspects:

  • Hierarchical Design: The model employs a 4-stage hierarchical Transformer that encodes multi-scale volumetric features, leveraging a more structured approach for capturing feature variations at different scales.
  • Efficient Attention Mechanism: SegFormer3D introduces a self-attention mechanism tailored for efficiency, compressing the sequence length to reduce computational overhead significantly.
  • Overlapping Patch Merging: This process ensures local continuity in voxel generation, aiming to enhance segmentation accuracy by maintaining neighborhood information across patches.
  • All-MLP Decoder: Instead of complex deconvolutional networks, SegFormer3D utilizes an all-MLP decoder, simplifying the process of generating high-quality segmentation masks and contributing to the model's efficiency.

The authors validate SegFormer3D through experiments on three major datasets: Synapse, BRaTs, and ACDC. The results demonstrate competitive mean Dice performance, cementing SegFormer3D's efficacy against larger models, such as nnFormer and TransUNet, while significantly reducing computational and memory requirements.

Implications and Future Directions

SegFormer3D facilitates broader accessibility to sophisticated 3D image segmentation models by significantly lowering the computational resources required for deployment. By demonstrating the competitive performance of a lightweight model, the paper suggests a future where medical image analysis can be more democratized—especially in environments with constrained access to large-scale computational infrastructure.

In theoretical paradigms, the success of SegFormer3D's architecture may point to broader applicability of memory-efficient Transformers in other areas of AI and image analysis. The hierarchical and efficient attention-based methodology could be explored further to enhance models in other domains requiring context-rich feature extraction from complex datasets.

Finally, SegFormer3D underscores the potential of lightweight Transformers offering a broader research pathway toward more sustainable AI, which balances performance with resource consumption—an increasingly pressing concern as models grow in complexity and application areas broaden.

Conclusion

SegFormer3D is a noteworthy contribution to the field of 3D medical image segmentation, displaying how efficiency and performance need not be mutually exclusive within deep learning architectures. With its significantly reduced parameter count and computational demands, SegFormer3D positions itself as an attractive option for researchers and practitioners focused on practical, resource-conscious AI deployments in medical imaging. Future explorations may lead to further enhancements in the balance between model size, efficiency, and segmentation performance, paving the way for similar innovations across diverse machine learning tasks.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (32)
  1. Deep learning techniques for automatic mri cardiac multi-structures segmentation and diagnosis: is the problem solved? IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 37(11), 2018.
  2. Dense-unet: a novel multiphoton in vivo cellular image segmentation model based on a convolutional neural network. Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 10(6):1275, 2020.
  3. Swin-unet: Unet-like pure transformer for medical image segmentation. In European conference on computer vision. Springer, 2022.
  4. Transclaw u-net: Claw u-net with transformers for medical image segmentation. 2022 5th International Conference on Information Communication and Signal Processing (ICICSP), 2021.
  5. Transunet: Transformers make strong encoders for medical image segmentation. arXiv:2102.04306, 2021.
  6. 3d u-net: learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse annotation. In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2016: 19th International Conference, Athens, Greece, October 17-21, 2016, Proceedings, Part II 19, pages 424–432. Springer, 2016.
  7. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv:2010.11929, 2020.
  8. 3d deeply supervised network for automatic liver segmentation from ct volumes. In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2016: 19th International Conference, Athens, Greece, October 17-21, 2016, Proceedings, Part II 19. Springer, 2016.
  9. Automatic multi-organ segmentation on abdominal ct with dense v-networks. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 37(8), 2018.
  10. Swin unetr: Swin transformers for semantic segmentation of brain tumors in mri images. In International MICCAI Brainlesion Workshop. Springer, 2021.
  11. Unetr: Transformers for 3d medical image segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF winter conference on applications of computer vision, 2022.
  12. Missformer: An effective transformer for 2d medical image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 42(5), 2023.
  13. nnu-net: Self-adapting framework for u-net-based medical image segmentation, 2018.
  14. How much position information do convolutional neural networks encode? arXiv:2001.08248, 2020.
  15. Miccai multi-atlas labeling beyond the cranial vault–workshop and challenge. In Proc. MICCAI Multi-Atlas Labeling Beyond Cranial Vault—Workshop Challenge, 2015.
  16. Pgd-unet: A position-guided deformable network for simultaneous segmentation of organs and tumors. In 2020 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). IEEE, 2020.
  17. Efficientvit: Memory efficient vision transformer with cascaded group attention. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 14420–14430, 2023.
  18. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 3431–3440, 2015.
  19. Decoupled weight decay regularization. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2017.
  20. The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (brats). IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 34(10), 2014.
  21. V-net: Fully convolutional neural networks for volumetric medical image segmentation. In 2016 fourth international conference on 3D vision (3DV), pages 565–571. Ieee, 2016.
  22. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th International Conference, Munich, Germany, October 5-9, 2015, Proceedings, Part III 18. Springer, 2015.
  23. Hierarchical 3d fully convolutional networks for multi-organ segmentation. arXiv:1704.06382, 2017.
  24. Transbts: Multimodal brain tumor segmentation using transformer. In Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2021: 24th International Conference, Strasbourg, France, September 27–October 1, 2021, Proceedings, Part I 24. Springer, 2021a.
  25. Pyramid vision transformer: A versatile backbone for dense prediction without convolutions. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, 2021b.
  26. Segformer: Simple and efficient design for semantic segmentation with transformers. Advances in Neural Information Processing, 34, 2021a.
  27. Cotr: Efficiently bridging cnn and transformer for 3d medical image segmentation. ArXiv, abs/2103.03024, 2021b.
  28. Levit-unet: Make faster encoders with transformer for medical image segmentation. ArXiv, abs/2107.08623, 2021.
  29. Transfuse: Fusing transformers and cnns for medical image segmentation. In Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2021. Springer, 2021.
  30. Rethinking semantic segmentation from a sequence-to-sequence perspective with transformers. 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2020.
  31. nnformer: Interleaved transformer for volumetric segmentation. arXiv:2109.03201, 2021.
  32. Deeply-supervised cnn for prostate segmentation. In 2017 international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN). IEEE, 2017.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Shehan Perera (4 papers)
  2. Pouyan Navard (3 papers)
  3. Alper Yilmaz (29 papers)
Citations (6)