Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
153 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Adjusting for bias due to measurement error in functional quantile regression models with error-prone functional and scalar covariates (2404.10063v1)

Published 15 Apr 2024 in stat.ME

Abstract: Wearable devices enable the continuous monitoring of physical activity (PA) but generate complex functional data with poorly characterized errors. Most work on functional data views the data as smooth, latent curves obtained at discrete time intervals with some random noise with mean zero and constant variance. Viewing this noise as homoscedastic and independent ignores potential serial correlations. Our preliminary studies indicate that failing to account for these serial correlations can bias estimations. In dietary assessments, epidemiologists often use self-reported measures based on food frequency questionnaires that are prone to recall bias. With the increased availability of complex, high-dimensional functional, and scalar biomedical data potentially prone to measurement errors, it is necessary to adjust for biases induced by these errors to permit accurate analyses in various regression settings. However, there has been limited work to address measurement errors in functional and scalar covariates in the context of quantile regression. Therefore, we developed new statistical methods based on simulation extrapolation (SIMEX) and mixed effects regression with repeated measures to correct for measurement error biases in this context. We conducted simulation studies to establish the finite sample properties of our new methods. The methods are illustrated through application to a real data set.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (10)
  1. Koenker R. Quantile regression. Cambridge University Press; 2005. 38.
  2. James GM. Generalized linear models with functional predictors. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology). 2002;64(3):411–432.
  3. Silverman B, Ramsay J. Functional data analysis. Springer; 2005.
  4. Chakraborty A, Panaretos VM. Regression with genuinely functional errors-in-covariates. arXiv preprint arXiv:171204290. 2017;.
  5. Fuller WA. Measurement error models. Chapman and Hall/CRC; 1987.
  6. Carroll RJ, Stefanski LA. Approximate quasi-likelihood estimation in models with surrogate predictors. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1990;85(411):652–663.
  7. Heidenreich WF, Cullings H. Use of the individual data of the a-bomb survivors for biologically based cancer models. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics. 2010;49:39–46.
  8. Nakashima E. Impact of additive covariate error on linear model. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods. 2019;48(22):5517–5529.
  9. Cook J, Stefanski L. Simulation-extrapolation estimation in parametric measurement error models. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1994;89(428):1314–1328.
  10. for Health Statistics (US) NC. National health and nutrition examination survey: Analytic guidelines, 1999-2010. Department of Health and Human Services Public Health Servic; 2013. 2013.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com