Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
110 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Mixing Modes: Active and Passive Integration of Speech, Text, and Visualization for Communicating Data Uncertainty (2404.08623v1)

Published 12 Apr 2024 in cs.HC

Abstract: Interpreting uncertain data can be difficult, particularly if the data presentation is complex. We investigate the efficacy of different modalities for representing data and how to combine the strengths of each modality to facilitate the communication of data uncertainty. We implemented two multimodal prototypes to explore the design space of integrating speech, text, and visualization elements. A preliminary evaluation with 20 participants from academic and industry communities demonstrates that there exists no one-size-fits-all approach for uncertainty communication strategies; rather, the effectiveness of conveying uncertain data is intertwined with user preferences and situational context, necessitating a more refined, multimodal strategy for future interface design.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (33)
  1. Bearman N.: Using Sound to Represent Uncertainty in Future Climate Predictions for the UK. In 17th International Conference on Auditory Display (2011), International Community for Auditory Display.
  2. Overview and State-of-the-Art of Uncertainty Visualization. In Scientific Visualization: Uncertainty, Multifield, Biomedical, and Scalable Visualization (London, 2014), Hansen C. D., Chen M., Johnson C. R., Kaufman A. E., Hagen H., (Eds.), Springer, pp. 3–27.
  3. D3: Data-Driven Documents. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 17, 12 (2011), 2301–2309.
  4. Bromley D., Setlur V.: What Is the Difference Between a Mountain and a Molehill? Quantifying Semantic Labeling of Visual Features in Line Charts. In IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2023).
  5. Dyer S., Adamo-Villani N.: Animated Versus Static User Interfaces: A Study of Mathsigner™. International Journal of Human and Social Sciences 3, 6 (2008).
  6. Semantic Interaction for Visual Text Analytics. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2012), CHI ’12, Association for Computing Machinery, p. 473–482.
  7. Uncertainty Displays Using Quantile Dotplots or CDFs Improve Transit Decision-Making. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2018), Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 1–12.
  8. Google: Speech Synthesis Markup Language (SSML) Reference, 2024. Google Cloud Documentation. URL: https://cloud.google.com/text-to-speech/docs/ssml.
  9. Hullman J.: Why authors don’t visualize uncertainty. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 26, 1 (2019), 130–139.
  10. Uncertainty Visualisation: An Interactive Visual Survey. In 2020 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis) (2020), IEEE, pp. 201–205.
  11. Jiang X., Pell M. D.: On How the Brain Decodes Vocal Cues About Speaker Confidence. Cortex 66 (2015), 9–34.
  12. Kay M.: ggdist: Visualizations of Distributions and Uncertainty. Northwestern University, 2023. R package version 3.3.0. URL: https://mjskay.github.io/ggdist/.
  13. When (Ish) is My Bus? User-Centered Visualizations of Uncertainty in Everyday, Mobile Predictive Systems. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New York, NY, USA, 2016), Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 5092–5103.
  14. Where’s the Uh, Hesitation? The Interplay Between Filled Pause Location, Speech Rate and Fundamental Frequency in Perception of Confidence. In Proceedings of Interspeech (Incheon, Korea, 2022), Interspeech, pp. 4990–4994.
  15. Komsta L., Novomestky F.: Moments, Cumulants, Skewness, Kurtosis and Related Tests. CRAN, 2022. R package version 0.14.1. URL: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/moments/moments.pdf.
  16. Lakoff G.: Hedges: A Study in Meaning Criteria and the Logic of Fuzzy Concepts. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2, 4 (1973), 458–508.
  17. MUSE: A Musical Data Sonification Toolkit. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Auditory Display, Palo Alto, California, November 2–5, 1997 (1997), Georgia Institute of Technology.
  18. LISTEN: Sounding Uncertainty Visualization. In Proceedings of Seventh Annual IEEE Visualization ’96 (1996), IEEE, pp. 189–195.
  19. Mahajan K. N., Gokhale L. A.: Comparative Study of Static and Interactive Visualization Approaches. International Journal on Computer Science and Engineering (IJCSE), e-ISSN (2018), 0975–3397.
  20. Visualizing Geospatial Information Uncertainty: What We Know and What We Need to Know. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 32 (07 2005), 139–160.
  21. OpenJS Foundation: Node.js, 2023. https://nodejs.org.
  22. Uncertainty Visualization. In Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online. Wiley, 02 2021, pp. 1–18.
  23. Uncertain about Uncertainty: How Qualitative Expressions of Forecaster Confidence Impact Decision-making with Uncertainty Visualizations. Frontiers in Psychology 11 (2021), 579267.
  24. Interactive Versus Static Decision Support Tools for COVID-19: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Public Health and Surveillance 8 (2021). URL: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:248240389.
  25. Smith V. L., Clark H. H.: On the Course of Answering Questions. Journal of Memory and Language 32 (1993), 25–38.
  26. Schriver K. A.: Dynamics in Document Design: Creating Text for Readers. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., USA, 1997.
  27. Revealing Uncertainty for Information Visualization. In AVI ’08: Proceedings of the working conference on advanced visual interfaces (05 2008), vol. 9, pp. 376–379.
  28. The Voice of Confidence: Paralinguistic Cues and Audience Evaluation. Journal of Research in Personality 7 (1973), 31–44.
  29. From Delays to Densities: Exploring Data Uncertainty through Speech, Text, and Visualization. In Eurographics Conference on Visualization (EuroVis) (2024), The Eurographics Association. to appear.
  30. Cross-genre and Cross-domain Detection of Semantic Uncertainty. Computational Linguistics 38, 2 (2012), 335–367.
  31. Sperber D., Wilson D.: Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Blackwell, Oxford, 1986/1995.
  32. Conveying Uncertainty in Data Visualizations to Screen-Reader Users Through Non-Visual Means. In The 25th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (ASSETS ’23) (New York, NY, USA, 2023), Association for Computing Machinery.
  33. (W3C) W. W. W. C.: WAI Web Accessibility Tutorials: Complex Images. World Wide Web Consortium website, 2019. https://www.w3.org/WAI/tutorials/images/complex/.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Chase Stokes (10 papers)
  2. Chelsea Sanker (3 papers)
  3. Bridget Cogley (4 papers)
  4. Vidya Setlur (31 papers)
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets