Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
157 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
43 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

GRANP: A Graph Recurrent Attentive Neural Process Model for Vehicle Trajectory Prediction (2404.08004v1)

Published 9 Apr 2024 in cs.LG and cs.RO

Abstract: As a vital component in autonomous driving, accurate trajectory prediction effectively prevents traffic accidents and improves driving efficiency. To capture complex spatial-temporal dynamics and social interactions, recent studies developed models based on advanced deep-learning methods. On the other hand, recent studies have explored the use of deep generative models to further account for trajectory uncertainties. However, the current approaches demonstrating indeterminacy involve inefficient and time-consuming practices such as sampling from trained models. To fill this gap, we proposed a novel model named Graph Recurrent Attentive Neural Process (GRANP) for vehicle trajectory prediction while efficiently quantifying prediction uncertainty. In particular, GRANP contains an encoder with deterministic and latent paths, and a decoder for prediction. The encoder, including stacked Graph Attention Networks, LSTM and 1D convolutional layers, is employed to extract spatial-temporal relationships. The decoder is used to learn a latent distribution and thus quantify prediction uncertainty. To reveal the effectiveness of our model, we evaluate the performance of GRANP on the highD dataset. Extensive experiments show that GRANP achieves state-of-the-art results and can efficiently quantify uncertainties. Additionally, we undertake an intuitive case study that showcases the interpretability of the proposed approach. The code is available at https://github.com/joy-driven/GRANP.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (21)
  1. S. Ammoun and F. Nashashibi, “Real time trajectory prediction for collision risk estimation between vehicles,” in 2009 IEEE 5Th international conference on intelligent computer communication and processing, pp. 417–422, IEEE, 2009.
  2. S. H. Park, B. Kim, C. M. Kang, C. C. Chung, and J. W. Choi, “Sequence-to-sequence prediction of vehicle trajectory via lstm encoder-decoder architecture,” in 2018 IEEE intelligent vehicles symposium (IV), pp. 1672–1678, IEEE, 2018.
  3. X. Li, X. Ying, and M. C. Chuah, “Grip: Graph-based interaction-aware trajectory prediction,” in 2019 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC), pp. 3960–3966, IEEE, 2019.
  4. S. Choi, N. Kweon, C. Yang, D. Kim, H. Shon, J. Choi, and K. Huh, “Dsa-gan: Driving style attention generative adversarial network for vehicle trajectory prediction,” in 2021 IEEE International Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC), pp. 1515–1520, IEEE, 2021.
  5. M. Á. De Miguel, J. M. Armingol, and F. García, “Vehicles trajectory prediction using recurrent vae network,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 32742–32749, 2022.
  6. R. Schubert, E. Richter, and G. Wanielik, “Comparison and evaluation of advanced motion models for vehicle tracking,” in 2008 11th international conference on information fusion, pp. 1–6, IEEE, 2008.
  7. A. Broadhurst, S. Baker, and T. Kanade, “Monte carlo road safety reasoning,” in IEEE Proceedings. Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2005., pp. 319–324, IEEE, 2005.
  8. L. Hewing, E. Arcari, L. P. Fröhlich, and M. N. Zeilinger, “On simulation and trajectory prediction with gaussian process dynamics,” in Learning for Dynamics and Control, pp. 424–434, PMLR, 2020.
  9. N. Deo, A. Rangesh, and M. M. Trivedi, “How would surround vehicles move? a unified framework for maneuver classification and motion prediction,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 129–140, 2018.
  10. A. Zyner, S. Worrall, and E. Nebot, “A recurrent neural network solution for predicting driver intention at unsignalized intersections,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1759–1764, 2018.
  11. Y. Xing, C. Lv, and D. Cao, “Personalized vehicle trajectory prediction based on joint time-series modeling for connected vehicles,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 1341–1352, 2019.
  12. N. Deo and M. M. Trivedi, “Convolutional social pooling for vehicle trajectory prediction,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops, pp. 1468–1476, 2018.
  13. M. D. Buhmann, “Radial basis functions,” Acta numerica, vol. 9, pp. 1–38, 2000.
  14. R. Krajewski, J. Bock, L. Kloeker, and L. Eckstein, “The highd dataset: A drone dataset of naturalistic vehicle trajectories on german highways for validation of highly automated driving systems,” in 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp. 2118–2125, 2018.
  15. H. Song, W. Ding, Y. Chen, S. Shen, M. Y. Wang, and Q. Chen, “Pip: Planning-informed trajectory prediction for autonomous driving,” in Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XXI 16, pp. 598–614, Springer, 2020.
  16. D. P. Kingma and J. Ba, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014.
  17. A. Alahi, K. Goel, V. Ramanathan, A. Robicquet, L. Fei-Fei, and S. Savarese, “Social lstm: Human trajectory prediction in crowded spaces,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2016.
  18. N. Deo and M. M. Trivedi, “Convolutional social pooling for vehicle trajectory prediction,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Workshops, June 2018.
  19. A. Gupta, J. Johnson, L. Fei-Fei, S. Savarese, and A. Alahi, “Social gan: Socially acceptable trajectories with generative adversarial networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), June 2018.
  20. K. Messaoud, I. Yahiaoui, A. Verroust-Blondet, and F. Nashashibi, “Non-local social pooling for vehicle trajectory prediction,” in 2019 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 975–980, IEEE, 2019.
  21. B. Mersch, T. Höllen, K. Zhao, C. Stachniss, and R. Roscher, “Maneuver-based trajectory prediction for self-driving cars using spatio-temporal convolutional networks,” in 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pp. 4888–4895, IEEE, 2021.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com