Mitigating Vulnerable Road Users Occlusion Risk Via Collective Perception: An Empirical Analysis (2404.07753v1)
Abstract: Recent reports from the World Health Organization highlight that Vulnerable Road Users (VRUs) have been involved in over half of the road fatalities in recent years, with occlusion risk - a scenario where VRUs are hidden from drivers' view by obstacles like parked vehicles - being a critical contributing factor. To address this, we present a novel algorithm that quantifies occlusion risk based on the dynamics of both vehicles and VRUs. This algorithm has undergone testing and evaluation using a real-world dataset from German intersections. Additionally, we introduce the concept of Maximum Tracking Loss (MTL), which measures the longest consecutive duration a VRU remains untracked by any vehicle in a given scenario. Our study extends to examining the role of the Collective Perception Service (CPS) in VRU safety. CPS enhances safety by enabling vehicles to share sensor information, thereby potentially reducing occlusion risks. Our analysis reveals that a 25% market penetration of CPS-equipped vehicles can substantially diminish occlusion risks and significantly curtail MTL. These findings demonstrate how various scenarios pose different levels of risk to VRUs and how the deployment of Collective Perception can markedly improve their safety. Furthermore, they underline the efficacy of our proposed metrics to capture occlusion risk as a safety factor.
- ETSI, “Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Vehicular Communications; Basic Set of Applications; Collective Perception Service; Release 2,” ETSI TS 103 324 v2.1.1.
- ETSI, “Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS); Vulnerable Road Users (VRU) awareness; Part 3: Specification of VRU awareness basic service; Release 2,” ETSI TS 103 300-3 V2.2.1.
- N. Puller, H.-J. Günther, G. Lucas, A. Leschke, and V. Rocco, “Towards increasing vru safety: A map-based and data-driven analysis of accident black spots,” in 2021 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC), pp. 60–67, 2021.
- J. Morgenroth, L. Wolf, S. Macht, A. Sasse, P. Hecker, M. Schack, M. Vollrath, U. Seiffert, K.-O. Proskawetz, and D. Otte, “Improving the safety of pedestrians by using a cooperative system,” in 2009 9th International Conference on Intelligent Transport Systems Telecommunications, (ITST), pp. 143–148, 2009.
- J. Bock, R. Krajewski, T. Moers, S. Runde, L. Vater, and L. Eckstein, “The ind dataset: A drone dataset of naturalistic road user trajectories at german intersections,” in 2020 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 1929–1934, 2020.
- S. Shalev-Shwartz, S. Shammah, and A. Shashua, “On a formal model of safe and scalable self-driving cars,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.06374, 2017.
- F. A. Schiegg, I. Llatser, D. Bischoff, and G. Volk, “Collective perception: A safety perspective,” Sensors, vol. 21, no. 1, 2021.
- K. Garlichs, A. Willecke, A.-C. Hagau, and L. C. Wolf, “Maneuver coordination for cavs: Its-g5 channel and service performance evaluation,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, pp. 1–15, 2023.
- H.-J. Günther, B. Mennenga, O. Trauer, R. Riebl, and L. Wolf, “Realizing collective perception in a vehicle,” in 2016 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC), pp. 1–8, 2016.
- S. Lobo, A. Festag, and C. Facchi, “Enhancing the safety of vulnerable road users: Messaging protocols for v2x communication,” in 2022 IEEE 96th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2022-Fall), pp. 1–7, 2022.
- A. Willecke, K. Garlichs, F. Schulze, and L. C. Wolf, “Vulnerable road users are important as well: Persons in the collective perception service,” in 2021 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC), pp. 24–31, 2021.
- W. Hugemann, “Driver reaction times in road traffic,” in Proceedings of XI EVU (European Association for Accident Research and Accident Analysis) Annual Meeting. Portorož, Slovenija, vol. 32, 2002.
- P. Greibe, “Braking distance, friction and behaviour,” Trafitec, Scion-DTU, 2007.