Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

GNN-based Probabilistic Supply and Inventory Predictions in Supply Chain Networks (2404.07523v1)

Published 11 Apr 2024 in cs.AI and cs.LG

Abstract: Successful supply chain optimization must mitigate imbalances between supply and demand over time. While accurate demand prediction is essential for supply planning, it alone does not suffice. The key to successful supply planning for optimal and viable execution lies in maximizing predictability for both demand and supply throughout an execution horizon. Therefore, enhancing the accuracy of supply predictions is imperative to create an attainable supply plan that matches demand without overstocking or understocking. However, in complex supply chain networks with numerous nodes and edges, accurate supply predictions are challenging due to dynamic node interactions, cascading supply delays, resource availability, production and logistic capabilities. Consequently, supply executions often deviate from their initial plans. To address this, we present the Graph-based Supply Prediction (GSP) probabilistic model. Our attention-based graph neural network (GNN) model predicts supplies, inventory, and imbalances using graph-structured historical data, demand forecasting, and original supply plan inputs. The experiments, conducted using historical data from a global consumer goods company's large-scale supply chain, demonstrate that GSP significantly improves supply and inventory prediction accuracy, potentially offering supply plan corrections to optimize executions.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (30)
  1. A framework for risk assessment, management and evaluation: Economic tool for quantifying risks in supply chain. Future Generation Computer Systems, 90(1):489–502, 2019.
  2. How attentive are graph attention networks? 2022.
  3. Geometric deep learning: Grids, groups, graphs, geodesics, and gauges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.13478, 2021.
  4. John D Croston. Forecasting and stock control for intermittent demands. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 23(3):289–303, 1972.
  5. Fast graph representation learning with pytorch geometric. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.02428, 2019.
  6. Lead time prediction in a flow-shop environment with analytical and machine learning approaches. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(11):1029–1034, 2018.
  7. Steven Hainey. The rise of s&oe: Achieving organizational objectives with improved execution. Journal of Business Forecasting, 41(3), 2022.
  8. Representation learning on graphs: Methods and applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.05584, 2017.
  9. Prediction of ocean import shipment lead time using machine learning methods. SN Applied Sciences, 2(7):1272, 2020.
  10. Sarah Hippold. How to set up s&oe in supply chain planning. Business Insights & Trends, Gartner, 2019. URL https://www.gartner.com/smarterwithgartner/how-to-set-up-soe-in-supply-chain-planning.
  11. Forecasting: principles and practice. OTexts, 2018.
  12. Dmitry Ivanov. Viable supply chain model: integrating agility, resilience and sustainability perspectives—lessons from and thinking beyond the covid-19 pandemic. Annals of operations research, 319(1):1411–1431, 2022.
  13. Categorical reparameterization with gumbel-softmax. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.01144, 2016.
  14. Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. 2017.
  15. Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Production and operations management, 14(1):53–68, 2005.
  16. Nikolaos Kourentzes. On intermittent demand model optimisation and selection. International Journal of Production Economics, 156:180–190, 2014.
  17. Lead time prediction using machine learning algorithms: A case study by a semiconductor manufacturer. Procedia Cirp, 72:1051–1056, 2018.
  18. M5 accuracy competition: Results, findings, and conclusions. International Journal of Forecasting, 38(4):1346–1364, 2022.
  19. Global supply chain risk management strategies. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(3):192–223, 2008.
  20. Using ai and ml to predict shipment times of therapeutics, diagnostics and vaccines in e-pharmacy supply chains during covid-19 pandemic. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 34(2):390–416, 2023.
  21. A new metric for lumpy and intermittent demand forecasts: Stock-keeping-oriented prediction error costs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.10537, 2020.
  22. Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019.
  23. Forecast combinations for intermittent demand. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 66(6):914–924, 2015.
  24. Deepar: Probabilistic forecasting with autoregressive recurrent networks. International Journal of Forecasting, 36(3):1181–1191, 2020.
  25. The accuracy of intermittent demand estimates. International Journal of forecasting, 21(2):303–314, 2005.
  26. The power of flexibility for mitigating supply chain risks. International journal of production economics, 116(1):12–27, 2008.
  27. On the bias of croston’s forecasting method. European Journal of Operational Research, 194(1):177–183, 2009.
  28. Intermittent demand forecasting with deep renewal processes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.10416, 2019.
  29. Graph attention networks. 2018. ISBN 1710.10903v3.
  30. Novel data analytics meets conventional container shipping: predicting delays by comparing various machine learning algorithms. Proceedings of the 53rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2020.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Hyung-il Ahn (2 papers)
  2. Young Chol Song (3 papers)
  3. Santiago Olivar (2 papers)
  4. Hershel Mehta (4 papers)
  5. Naveen Tewari (1 paper)
Citations (1)
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com