Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Echo Chambers in the Age of Algorithms: An Audit of Twitter's Friend Recommender System (2404.06422v1)

Published 9 Apr 2024 in cs.SI and cs.CY

Abstract: The presence of political misinformation and ideological echo chambers on social media platforms is concerning given the important role that these sites play in the public's exposure to news and current events. Algorithmic systems employed on these platforms are presumed to play a role in these phenomena, but little is known about their mechanisms and effects. In this work, we conduct an algorithmic audit of Twitter's Who-To-Follow friend recommendation system, the first empirical audit that investigates the impact of this algorithm in-situ. We create automated Twitter accounts that initially follow left and right affiliated U.S. politicians during the 2022 U.S. midterm elections and then grow their information networks using the platform's recommender system. We pair the experiment with an observational study of Twitter users who already follow the same politicians. Broadly, we find that while following the recommendation algorithm leads accounts into dense and reciprocal neighborhoods that structurally resemble echo chambers, the recommender also results in less political homogeneity of a user's network compared to accounts growing their networks through social endorsement. Furthermore, accounts that exclusively followed users recommended by the algorithm had fewer opportunities to encounter content centered on false or misleading election narratives compared to choosing friends based on social endorsement.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (48)
  1. Joy Anyanwu and Rashawn Ray. 2022. Why is Elon Musk’s Twitter takeover increasing hate speech? https://www.brookings.edu/articles/why-is-elon-musks-twitter-takeover-increasing-hate-speech/
  2. Jack Bandy and Nicholas Diakopoulos. 2021. More Accounts, Fewer Links: How Algorithmic Curation Impacts Media Exposure in Twitter Timelines. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, CSCW1 (April 2021), 1–28.
  3. Jack Bandy and Tomo Lazovich. 2022. Exposure to Marginally Abusive Content on Twitter. (Jul 2022). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4175612
  4. Auditing Algorithmic Bias on Twitter. In 13th ACM Web Science Conference 2021 (Virtual Event, United Kingdom) (WebSci ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 65–73.
  5. Followback clusters, satellite audiences, and bridge nodes: Coengagement networks for the 2020 US election. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 17 (Jun 2023), 59–71.
  6. Echo Chambers, Rabbit Holes, and Algorithmic Bias: How YouTube Recommends Content to Real Users. (May 2022).
  7. Environmental users abandoned Twitter after Musk takeover. Trends in ecology and evolution 38, 10 (Oct 2023), 893–895.
  8. Subscriptions and external links help drive resentful users to alternative and extremist YouTube videos. (April 2022). arXiv:2204.10921 [cs.SI]
  9. Neutral bots probe political bias on social media. Nat. Commun. 12, 1 (Sept. 2021), 5580.
  10. The echo chamber effect on social media. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 118, 9 (March 2021).
  11. The effect of people recommenders on echo chambers and polarization. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, Vol. 16. 90–101.
  12. Quantifying echo chamber effects in information spreading over political communication networks. EPJ Data Science 8, 1 (Dec. 2019), 1–13.
  13. The spreading of misinformation online. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113, 3 (Jan 2016), 554–559.
  14. Auditing Human-Machine Communication Systems Using Simulated Humans. (Aug. 2021).
  15. Elizabeth Dubois and Grant Blank. 2018. The echo chamber is overstated: The moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Inf. Commun. Soc. 21, 5 (May 2018), 729–745.
  16. Link recommendations: Their impact on network structure and minorities. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Web Science Conference 2022 (Barcelona, Spain) (WebSci ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 228–238.
  17. Filter Bubbles, Echo Chambers, and Online News Consumption. Public opinion quarterly 80, S1 (Mar 2016), 298–320.
  18. Political Discourse on Social Media: Echo Chambers, Gatekeepers, and the Price of Bipartisanship. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference (WWW ’18). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, CHE, 913–922.
  19. Venkata Rama Kiran Garimella and Ingmar Weber. 2017. A Long-Term Analysis of Polarization on Twitter. ICWSM 11, 1 (May 2017), 528–531.
  20. R. Kelly Garrett. 2009. Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users. Journal of computer-mediated communication: JCMC 14, 2 (Jan 2009), 265–285.
  21. Brandi Geurkink. 2023. Twitter’s Open Source Algorithm Is a Red Herring. https://www.wired.com/story/twitters-open-source-algorithm-is-a-red-herring/. Wired (7 April 2023).
  22. Avoiding the echo chamber about echo chambers: Why selective exposure to like-minded political news is less prevalent than you think. (Jan. 2018).
  23. YouTube, The Great Radicalizer? Auditing and Mitigating Ideological Biases in YouTube Recommendations. (March 2022). arXiv:2203.10666 [cs.CY]
  24. Examining the consumption of radical content on YouTube. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, 32 (2021), e2101967118.
  25. Measuring Misinformation in Video Search Platforms: An Audit Study on YouTube. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 4, CSCW1 (May 2020), 1–27.
  26. Repeat Spreaders and Election Delegitimization: A Comprehensive Dataset of Misinformation Tweets from the 2020 US Election. Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media 2 (2022).
  27. David Krackhardt and Robert N Stern. 1988. Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Social psychology quarterly (1988), 123–140.
  28. Emily Kubin and Christian von Sikorski. 2021. The role of (social) media in political polarization: a systematic review. Annals of the International Communication Association 45, 3 (July 2021), 188–206.
  29. Social Media, Network Heterogeneity, and Opinion Polarization. J. Commun. 64, 4 (Aug. 2014), 702–722.
  30. Misinformation of COVID-19 vaccines and vaccine hesitancy. Scientific reports 12, 1 (Aug 2022), 13681.
  31. The behaviors and attitudes of US adults on Twitter. (2021).
  32. Right and left, partisanship predicts (asymmetric) vulnerability to misinformation. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review (Feb 2021). https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-55
  33. Right and left, partisanship predicts (asymmetric) vulnerability to misinformation. HKS Misinfo Review (Feb. 2021).
  34. Caroline Mimbs Nyce. 2023. The New ‘Transparent’ Twitter Isn’t Very Transparent. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2023/04/elon-musk-twitter-algorithm-code-public/673642/. The Atlantic (5 April 2023).
  35. “it is just a flu”: Assessing the effect of watch history on YouTube’s pseudoscientific video recommendations. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 16 (May 2022), 723–734.
  36. Eli Pariser. 2011. The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. penguin UK.
  37. Pew Research Center. 2017. The Future of Truth and Misinformation Online. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2017/10/19/the-future-of-truth-and-misinformation-online/
  38. Pew Research Center. 2022. Social Media and News Fact Sheet. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/fact-sheet/social-media-and-news-fact-sheet/
  39. The Amplification Paradox in Recommender Systems. (Feb. 2023). arXiv:2302.11225 [cs.CY]
  40. Does the Musk Twitter Takeover Matter? Political Influencers, Their Arguments, and the Quality of Information They Share. Socius 9 (Jan. 2023), 23780231231152193.
  41. Gabriel R. Sanchez and Keesha Middlemass. 2022. Misinformation is eroding the public’s confidence in democracy. Brookings Institute (Jul 2022). https://www.brookings.edu/articles/misinformation-is-eroding-the-publics-confidence-in-democracy/
  42. Auditing algorithms: Research methods for detecting discrimination on internet platforms. Data and discrimination: converting critical concerns into productive inquiry 22, 2014 (2014), 4349–4357.
  43. Link recommendation algorithms and dynamics of polarization in online social networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 118, 50 (Dec. 2021).
  44. ElectionRumors2022: A dataset of election rumors on Twitter during the 2022 US midterms.
  45. The Effect of Recommendations on Network Structure. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web (Montréal, Québec, Canada) (WWW ’16). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, CHE, 1157–1167.
  46. Cass R. Sunstein. 2002. The law of group polarization. The journal of political philosophy 10, 2 (Jun 2002), 175–195.
  47. Ludovic Terren and Rosa Borge-Bravo. 2021. Echo Chambers on Social Media: A Systematic Review of the Literature. RCR 9 (March 2021), 99–118.
  48. Antonela Tommasel and Filippo Menczer. 2022. Do Recommender Systems Make Social Media More Susceptible to Misinformation Spreaders?. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (Seattle, WA, USA) (RecSys ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 550–555.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Kayla Duskin (3 papers)
  2. Joseph S. Schafer (49 papers)
  3. Jevin D. West (17 papers)
  4. Emma S. Spiro (49 papers)
Citations (4)