Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

SUPPLY: Sustainable multi-UAV Performance-aware Placement Algorithm for Flying Networks (2404.06197v1)

Published 9 Apr 2024 in cs.NI and eess.SP

Abstract: Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) are used for a wide range of applications. Due to characteristics such as the ability to hover and carry cargo on-board, rotary-wing UAVs have been considered suitable platforms for carrying communications nodes, including Wi-Fi Access Points and cellular Base Stations. This gave rise to the concept of Flying Networks (FNs), now making part of the so-called Non-Terrestrial Networks (NTNs) defined in 3GPP. In scenarios where the deployment of terrestrial networks is not feasible, the use of FNs has emerged as a solution to provide wireless connectivity. However, the management of the communications resources in FNs imposes significant challenges, especially regarding the positioning of the UAVs so that the Quality of Service (QoS) offered to the Ground Users (GUs) and devices is maximized. Moreover, unlike terrestrial networks that are directly connected to the power grid, UAVs typically rely on on-board batteries that need to be recharged. In order to maximize the UAVs' flying time, the energy consumed by the UAVs needs to be minimized. When it comes to multi-UAV placement, most state-of-the-art solutions focus on maximizing the coverage area and assume that the UAVs keep hovering in a fixed position while serving GUs. Also, they do not address the energy-aware multi-UAV placement problem in networking scenarios where the GUs may have different QoS requirements and may not be uniformly distributed across the area of interest. In this work, we propose the Sustainable multi-UAV Performance-aware Placement (SUPPLY) algorithm. SUPPLY defines the energy and performance-aware positioning of multiple UAVs in an FN. To accomplish this, SUPPLY defines trajectories that minimize UAVs' energy consumption, while ensuring the targeted QoS levels. The obtained results show up to 25% energy consumption reduction with minimal impact on throughput and delay.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (22)
  1. Y. Zeng, J. Xu, and R. Zhang, “Energy minimization for wireless communication with rotary-wing uav,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 2329–2345, 2019.
  2. H. Rodrigues, A. Coelho, M. Ricardo, and R. Campos, “Joint energy and performance aware relay positioning in flying networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 43 848–43 864, 2022.
  3. ——, “Energy-aware relay positioning in flying networks.” Int. J. Commun. Syst., 2020.
  4. A. Coelho, H. Fontes, R. Campos, and M. Ricardo, “Placement and allocation of communications resources in slicing-aware flying networks,” in 2022 17th Wireless On-Demand Network Systems and Services Conference (WONS), 2022, pp. 1–8.
  5. Q. T. Do, D. T. Hua, A. T. Tran, and S. Cho, “Energy efficient multi-uav communication using ddpg,” in 2022 13th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), 2022, pp. 1071–1075.
  6. N. Babu, C. B. Papadias, and P. Popovski, “Energy-efficient 3-d deployment of aerial access points in a uav communication system,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 2883–2887, 2020.
  7. I. A. Nemer, T. R. Sheltami, S. Belhaiza, and A. S. Mahmoud, “Energy-efficient uav movement control for fair communication coverage: A deep reinforcement learning approach,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 5, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/5/1919
  8. U. Demir, M. C. Ipek, C. Toker, and O. Ekici, “Energy-efficient rotary-wing uav deployment under flight dynamics and qos constraints,” 2019 IEEE International Black Sea Conference on Communications and Networking, BlackSeaCom 2019, 6 2019.
  9. C. Muli, S. Park, and M. Liu, “A comparative study on energy consumption models for drones,” 2022. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.01609
  10. T. A. Rodrigues, J. Patrikar, A. Choudhry, J. Feldgoise, V. Arcot, A. Gahlaut, S. Lau, B. Moon, B. Wagner, H. S. Matthews, S. Scherer, and C. Samaras, “In-flight positional and energy use data set of a dji matrice 100 quadcopter for small package delivery,” Scientific Data, vol. 8, 12 2021.
  11. H. Yan, Y. Chen, and S.-H. Yang, “New energy consumption model for rotary-wing uav propulsion,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 2009–2012, 2021.
  12. N. Gao, Y. Zeng, J. Wang, D. Wu, C. Zhang, Q. Song, J. Qian, and S. Jin, “Energy model for uav communications: Experimental validation and model generalization,” China Communications, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 253–264, 2021.
  13. H. Rodrigues, “Gateway positioning in flying networks,” Master’s thesis, Faculdade de Engenharia Universidade do Porto, 7 2020. [Online]. Available: https://hdl.handle.net/10216/132922
  14. A. Coelho, H. Fontes, R. Campos, and M. Ricardo, “Traffic-aware gateway placement for high-capacity flying networks,” in 2021 IEEE 93rd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2021-Spring), 2021, pp. 1–6.
  15. E. N. Almeida, R. Campos, and M. Ricardo, “Traffic-aware multi-tier flying network: Network planning for throughput improvement,” in 2018 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), 2018, pp. 1–6.
  16. M. Dai, N. Huang, Y. Wu, J. Gao, and Z. Su, “Unmanned aerial vehicles assisted wireless networks: Advancements, challenges, and solutions,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, pp. 1–1, 2022.
  17. “Gurobi,” Jun 2023, (Accessed: 2023-6-19). [Online]. Available: https://www.gurobi.com/
  18. P. Ribeiro, “P-ribeiro10/multi-uav-energy-consumption-simulator,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://github.com/P-Ribeiro10/Multi-UAV-Energy-Consumption-Simulator
  19. H. Rodrigues, “Uav-power-simulator,” (Accessed: 2023-01-04). [Online]. Available: https://github.com/rhugo97/UAV-Power-Simulator
  20. “ns-3 website,” (Accessed: 2023-01-04). [Online]. Available: https://www.nsnam.org/
  21. K. Nichols and V. Jacobson, “Controlling queue delay: A modern aqm is just one piece of the solution to bufferbloat.” Queue, vol. 10, no. 5, p. 20–34, may 2012. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1145/2208917.2209336
  22. E. N. Almeida, A. Coelho, J. Ruela, R. Campos, and M. Ricardo, “Joint traffic-aware uav placement and predictive routing for aerial networks,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 118, p. 102525, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570870521000779
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Pedro Ribeiro (107 papers)
  2. André Coelho (87 papers)
  3. Rui Campos (35 papers)
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.