Can Edge Computing fulfill the requirements of automated vehicular services using 5G network ? (2404.05296v1)
Abstract: Communication and computation services supporting Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAVs) are characterized by stringent requirements, in terms of response time and reliability. Fulfilling these requirements is crucial for ensuring road safety and traffic optimization. The conceptually simple solution of hosting these services in the vehicles increases their cost (mainly due to the installation and maintenance of computation infrastructure) and may drain their battery excessively. Such disadvantages can be tackled via Multi-Access Edge Computing (MEC), consisting in deploying computation capability in network nodes deployed close to the devices (vehicles in this case), such as to satisfy the stringent CAV requirements. However, it is not yet clear under which conditions MEC can support CAV requirements and for which services. To shed light on this question, we conduct a simulation campaign using well-known open-source simulation tools, namely OMNeT++, Simu5G, Veins, INET, and SUMO. We are thus able to provide a reality check on MEC for CAV, pinpointing what are the computation capacities that must be installed in the MEC, to support the different services, and the amount of vehicles that a single MEC node can support. We find that such parameters must vary a lot, depending on the service considered. This study can serve as a preliminary basis for network operators to plan future deployment of MEC to support CAV.
- B. P. Rimal, D. Pham Van, and M. Maier, “Mobile-edge computing versus centralized cloud computing over a converged fiwi access network,” IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 498–513, 2017.
- “Omnet++.” [Online]. Available: https://github.com/omnetpp/omnetpp
- “Simu5g.” [Online]. Available: https://github.com/Unipisa/Simu5G
- “Veins.” [Online]. Available: https://github.com/sommer/veins
- “The 6 levels of vehicle autonomy explained.” [Online]. Available: https://www.synopsys.com/automotive/autonomous-driving-levels.html
- C. Quadri, V. Mancuso, M. A. Marsan, and G. P. Rossi, “Edge-based platoon control,” Computer Communications, vol. 181, pp. 17–31, 2022.
- F. Malandrino, C. F. Chiasserini, and G. M. Dell’Aera, “Edge-powered assisted driving for connected cars,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 874–889, 2023.
- S. Tang, B. Chen, H. Iwen, J. Hirsch, S. Fu, Q. Yang, P. Palacharla, N. Wang, X. Wang, and W. Shi, “Vecframe: A vehicular edge computing framework for connected autonomous vehicles,” in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Edge Computing (EDGE), 2021, pp. 68–77.
- K. Sasaki, N. Suzuki, S. Makido, and A. Nakao, “Vehicle control system coordinated between cloud and mobile edge computing,” in 2016 55th Annual Conference of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers of Japan (SICE), 2016, pp. 1122–1127.
- M. Boban, A. Kousaridas, K. Manolakis, J. Eichinger, and W. Xu, “Connected roads of the future: Use cases, requirements, and design considerations for vehicle-to-everything communications,” IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 110–123, 2018.
- K. Fizza, N. Auluck, and A. Azim, “Improving the schedulability of real-time tasks using fog computing,” IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 372–385, 2022.
- A. Noferi, G. Nardini, G. Stea, and A. Virdis, “Rapid prototyping and performance evaluation of etsi mec-based applications,” Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, vol. 123, p. 102700, 2023.
- “Inet.” [Online]. Available: https://github.com/inet-framework/inet
- P. A. Lopez, M. Behrisch, L. Bieker-Walz, J. Erdmann, Y.-P. Flötteröd, R. Hilbrich, L. Lücken, J. Rummel, P. Wagner, and E. Wießner, “Microscopic traffic simulation using sumo,” in The 21st IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems. IEEE, 2018.
- “Traci.” [Online]. Available: https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/TraCI.html
- A. Virdis, G. Nardini, G. Stea, and D. Sabella, “End-to-end performance evaluation of mec deployments in 5g scenarios,” Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 57, Dec 2020.
- F. Metzger, T. Hoßfeld, A. Bauer, S. Kounev, and P. E. Heegaard, “Modeling of aggregated iot traffic and its application to an iot cloud,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 107, no. 4, pp. 679–694, 2019.
- S. Neumeier, E. A. Walelgne, V. Bajpai, J. Ott, and C. Facchi, “Measuring the feasibility of teleoperated driving in mobile networks,” in 2019 Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA), 2019, pp. 113–120.
- V. Cislaghi, C. Quadri, V. Mancuso, and M. A. Marsan, “Simulation of tele-operated driving over 5g using carla and omnet++,” in 2023 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC), 2023, pp. 81–88.
- “Instructions per second.” [Online]. Available: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instructions_per_second