Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

No "Zero-Shot" Without Exponential Data: Pretraining Concept Frequency Determines Multimodal Model Performance (2404.04125v3)

Published 4 Apr 2024 in cs.CV, cs.CL, and cs.LG

Abstract: Web-crawled pretraining datasets underlie the impressive "zero-shot" evaluation performance of multimodal models, such as CLIP for classification/retrieval and Stable-Diffusion for image generation. However, it is unclear how meaningful the notion of "zero-shot" generalization is for such multimodal models, as it is not known to what extent their pretraining datasets encompass the downstream concepts targeted for during "zero-shot" evaluation. In this work, we ask: How is the performance of multimodal models on downstream concepts influenced by the frequency of these concepts in their pretraining datasets? We comprehensively investigate this question across 34 models and five standard pretraining datasets (CC-3M, CC-12M, YFCC-15M, LAION-400M, LAION-Aesthetics), generating over 300GB of data artifacts. We consistently find that, far from exhibiting "zero-shot" generalization, multimodal models require exponentially more data to achieve linear improvements in downstream "zero-shot" performance, following a sample inefficient log-linear scaling trend. This trend persists even when controlling for sample-level similarity between pretraining and downstream datasets, and testing on purely synthetic data distributions. Furthermore, upon benchmarking models on long-tailed data sampled based on our analysis, we demonstrate that multimodal models across the board perform poorly. We contribute this long-tail test set as the "Let it Wag!" benchmark to further research in this direction. Taken together, our study reveals an exponential need for training data which implies that the key to "zero-shot" generalization capabilities under large-scale training paradigms remains to be found.

Understanding the Role of Concept Frequency in Multimodal Model Performance

Introduction

Multimodal models, especially those trained on large-scale web-crawled datasets, have shown impressive capabilities in "zero-shot" generalization across a variety of tasks. However, the genuine extent of their generalization ability, particularly in relation to the representation of concepts within their pretraining data, remains a topic of considerable interest and ongoing research. This work explores the significant influence of pretraining concept frequency on multimodal model performance, revealing a critical insight into the nature of "zero-shot" learning in large-scale trained models.

Concept Frequency and Model Performance

The core analysis of this paper revolves around the relationship between the frequency of concepts in pretraining datasets and the zero-shot performance of models on tasks involving these concepts. The findings suggest a clear log-linear relationship where an exponential increase in concept frequency is required for a linear improvement in model performance across tasks. This relationship holds true consistently across different models, tasks, and datasets, emphasizing the importance of concept representation within pretraining data for achieving higher levels of zero-shot generalization.

Methodological Insights

The methodology framed for investigating the correlation between concept frequency and model performance includes several novel aspects:

  • Definition and Extraction of Concepts: The work defines concepts broadly, encompassing class categories for classification tasks, and objects or subjects within text captions or prompts for retrieval and generation tasks, respectively. This inclusive definition allows for a comprehensive analysis across varied tasks.
  • Concept Frequency Estimation: A meticulous process involving both text-based and image-based searches is employed to determine concept frequency within pretraining datasets. This process considers both single-word and multi-word concepts, employing techniques such as part-of-speech tagging and advanced image tagging models to accurately tally concept occurrences.

Implications and Theoretical Insights

This paper’s findings shed light on the substantial dependence of multimodal models on the explicit representation of concepts within their pretraining data for "zero-shot" generalization. The revealed log-linear scaling trend implies a significant limitation in the learning efficiency of current models, requiring exponentially more data to achieve incremental performance improvements. Additionally, the observed long-tailed distribution of concept frequencies within pretraining datasets presents further challenges, highlighting a discrepancy between the rare and common concepts, and their respective impacts on model generalization capabilities.

Future Directions and Challenges

The implications of this work prompt several avenues for future research, including the exploration of models and training methodologies that can better leverage long-tailed data distributions and improve sample efficiency. Additionally, the significant role of concept frequency invites further investigation into data curation and augmentation strategies that may help balance concept representation in pretraining datasets, potentially enhancing "zero-shot" generalization capabilities.

Conclusion

The rigorous investigation presented elucidates the critical role that concept frequency within pretraining datasets plays in shaping the "zero-shot" generalization performance of multimodal models. By revealing a log-linear relationship between concept frequency and model performance, this work provides valuable insights into the inherent limitations and challenges faced by current large-scale trained models. The findings highlight the necessity for more efficient learning mechanisms and thoughtful data curation strategies to advance the state-of-the-art in multimodal learning.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (132)
  1. Lexica search with stable diffusion v1.5 (1b). https://lexica.art/?q=stable+diffusion+1.5.
  2. Dreamlike diffusion v1.0. https://huggingface.co/dreamlike-art/dreamlike-diffusion-1.0, a.
  3. Dreamlike photoreal v2.0. https://huggingface.co/dreamlike-art/dreamlike-photoreal-2.0, b.
  4. Openjourney v1. https://huggingface.co/prompthero/openjourney, a.
  5. Openjourney v2. https://huggingface.co/prompthero/openjourney-v4, b.
  6. Redshift diffusion. https://huggingface.co/nitrosocke/redshift-diffusion.
  7. Vintedois (22h) diffusion model v0.1. https://huggingface.co/22h/vintedois-diffusion-v0-1.
  8. Human (q5). https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q5.
  9. Deepfloyd if. https://github.com/deep-floyd/IF, 2023.
  10. Semdedup: Data-efficient learning at web-scale through semantic deduplication. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023.
  11. Effective pruning of web-scale datasets based on complexity of concept clusters. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2024.
  12. Gpt-4 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774, 2023.
  13. Tracing knowledge in language models back to the training data. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP, 2022.
  14. Multifusion: Fusing pre-trained models for multi-lingual, multi-modal image generation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2023.
  15. Birdsnap: Large-scale fine-grained visual categorization of birds. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2014.
  16. Improving image generation with better captions. In Computer Science, 2023.
  17. Large image datasets: A pyrrhic win for computer vision? In 2021 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2021.
  18. Into the laion’s den: Investigating hate in multimodal datasets. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023.
  19. Food-101–mining discriminative components with random forests. In European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2014.
  20. Image retrieval outperforms diffusion models on data augmentation. Transactions on Machine Learning Research (TMLR), 2023.
  21. Quantifying memorization across neural language models. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, 2023a.
  22. Extracting training data from diffusion models. In 32nd USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 23), pages 5253–5270, 2023b.
  23. Fitclip: Refining large-scale pretrained image-text models for zero-shot video understanding tasks. British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC), 2022.
  24. Data distributional properties drive emergent in-context learning in transformers. Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2022.
  25. Speak, memory: An archaeology of books known to chatgpt/gpt-4. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.00118, 2023.
  26. Conceptual 12m: Pushing web-scale image-text pre-training to recognize long-tail visual concepts. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2021.
  27. Sharegpt4v: Improving large multi-modal models with better captions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.12793, 2023.
  28. Pali: A jointly-scaled multilingual language-image model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.06794, 2022.
  29. Dall-eval: Probing the reasoning skills and social biases of text-to-image generation models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 3043–3054, 2023.
  30. Describing textures in the wild. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2014.
  31. Testing relational understanding in text-guided image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.00005, 2022.
  32. dailydalle2023. Instagram account of daily dall-e. https://www.instagram.com/dailydall.e/, 2024. Accessed: 2024-04-03.
  33. Dall·e mini, 7 2021. URL https://github.com/borisdayma/dalle-mini.
  34. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2009.
  35. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929, 2020.
  36. Perceptual hashing for image authentication: A survey. Signal Processing: Image Communication, 2020.
  37. Measuring causal effects of data statistics on language model’sfactual’predictions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.14251, 2022.
  38. What’s in my big data? arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.20707, 2023.
  39. The role of pre-training data in transfer learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13602, 2023.
  40. Scaling rectified flow transformers for high-resolution image synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.03206, 2024.
  41. Data determines distributional robustness in contrastive language image pre-training (clip). arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.01397, 2022.
  42. Data filtering networks, 2023.
  43. Learning generative visual models from few training examples: An incremental bayesian approach tested on 101 object categories. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop (CVPR-W), 2004.
  44. Datacomp: In search of the next generation of multimodal datasets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.14108, 2023.
  45. Cyclip: Cyclic contrastive language-image pretraining. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.14459, 2022.
  46. Caltech-256 object category dataset. 2007.
  47. Dylan Jasper Hadfield-Menell. The Principal–Agent Alignment Problem in Artificial Intelligence. University of California, Berkeley, 2021.
  48. Synthclip: Are we ready for a fully synthetic clip training? arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01832, 2024.
  49. Optimizing prompts for text-to-image generation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024.
  50. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 770–778, 2016.
  51. Is synthetic data from generative models ready for image recognition? arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.07574, 2022.
  52. Eurosat: A novel dataset and deep learning benchmark for land use and land cover classification. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 12(7):2217–2226, 2019.
  53. Clipscore: A reference-free evaluation metric for image captioning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.08718, 2021.
  54. Clipscore: A reference-free evaluation metric for image captioning, 2022.
  55. spacy 2: Natural language understanding with bloom embeddings, convolutional neural networks and incremental parsing. To appear, 7(1):411–420, 2017.
  56. Open-set image tagging with multi-grained text supervision. arXiv e-prints, pages arXiv–2310, 2023.
  57. Openclip, July 2021. URL https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5143773. If you use this software, please cite it as below.
  58. Large language models struggle to learn long-tail knowledge. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pages 15696–15707. PMLR, 2023.
  59. Scaling up gans for text-to-image synthesis. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2023.
  60. Vilt: Vision-and-language transformer without convolution or region supervision. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2021.
  61. Kimmo Koskenniemi. A general computational model for word-form recognition and production. In 10th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and 22nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. The Association for Computational Linguistics, 1984.
  62. 3d object representations for fine-grained categorization. In International Conference on Computer Vision Workshop (ICCV-W), 2013.
  63. Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images. 2009.
  64. From scarcity to efficiency: Improving clip training via visual-enriched captions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.07699, 2023.
  65. Attribute-based classification for zero-shot visual object categorization. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 36(3):453–465, 2013.
  66. Deduplicating training data makes language models better. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 8424–8445, 2022.
  67. Holistic evaluation of text-to-image models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2023.
  68. Align before fuse: Vision and language representation learning with momentum distillation. Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2021.
  69. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), 2014.
  70. A pretrainer’s guide to training data: Measuring the effects of data age, domain coverage, quality, & toxicity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.13169, 2023.
  71. Sieve: Multimodal dataset pruning using image captioning models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.02110, 2023.
  72. T-mars: Improving visual representations by circumventing text feature learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.03132, 2023.
  73. Fine-grained visual classification of aircraft. arXiv preprint arXiv:1306.5151, 2013.
  74. Explaining clip’s performance disparities on data from blind/low vision users. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.17315, 2023.
  75. Does clip’s generalization performance mainly stem from high train-test similarity? arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.09562, 2023.
  76. Scaling open-vocabulary object detection. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2023.
  77. Slip: Self-supervision meets language-image pre-training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.12750, 2021.
  78. Quality not quantity: On the interaction between dataset design and robustness of clip. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.05516, 2022.
  79. Improving multimodal datasets with image captioning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023.
  80. Automated flower classification over a large number of classes. In 2008 Sixth Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics & Image Processing, pages 722–729. IEEE, 2008.
  81. Dinov2: Learning robust visual features without supervision. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.07193, 2023.
  82. The neglected tails of vision-language models. CVPR, 2024.
  83. Cats and dogs. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2012.
  84. Steven T Piantadosi. Zipf’s word frequency law in natural language: A critical review and future directions. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 21:1112–1130, 2014.
  85. Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion models for high-resolution image synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01952, 2023.
  86. From categories to classifier: Name-only continual learning by exploring the web. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.11293, 2023.
  87. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2021.
  88. On the connection between pre-training data diversity and fine-tuning robustness. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024.
  89. Zero-shot text-to-image generation. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), 2021.
  90. Impact of pretraining term frequencies on few-shot numerical reasoning. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2022, pages 840–854, 2022a.
  91. Snoopy: An online interface for exploring the effect of pretraining term frequencies on few-shot lm performance. In Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations, pages 389–395, 2022b.
  92. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2022.
  93. mindall-e on conceptual captions. https://github.com/kakaobrain/minDALL-E, 2021.
  94. Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep language understanding. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:36479–36494, 2022.
  95. Generating images of rare concepts using pretrained diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.14530, 18, 2023.
  96. Is a caption worth a thousand images? a controlled study for representation learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.07635, 2022.
  97. Fake it till you make it: Learning transferable representations from synthetic imagenet clones. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2023.
  98. Laion-400m: Open dataset of clip-filtered 400 million image-text pairs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.02114, 2021.
  99. Laion-5b: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:25278–25294, 2022.
  100. The bias amplification paradox in text-to-image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.00755, 2023.
  101. Vipe: Visualise pretty-much everything. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 5477–5494, 2023.
  102. Quantifying association capabilities of large language models and its implications on privacy leakage. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.12707, 2023.
  103. Conceptual captions: A cleaned, hypernymed, image alt-text dataset for automatic image captioning. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 2556–2565, 2018.
  104. Ucf101: A dataset of 101 human actions classes from videos in the wild. arXiv preprint arXiv:1212.0402, 2012.
  105. Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:19523–19536, 2022.
  106. Student. Probable error of a correlation coefficient. Biometrika, pages 302–310, 1908.
  107. Going deeper with convolutions. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2015.
  108. Gemini: a family of highly capable multimodal models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11805, 2023.
  109. Yfcc100m: The new data in multimedia research. Communications of the ACM, 59(2):64–73, 2016.
  110. Winoground: Probing vision and language models for visio-linguistic compositionality. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2022.
  111. Stablerep: Synthetic images from text-to-image models make strong visual representation learners. Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 2023.
  112. D4: Improving llm pretraining via document de-duplication and diversification. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36, 2024.
  113. Cobra: Contrastive bi-modal representation algorithm. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.03687, 2020.
  114. Visual data-type understanding does not emerge from scaling vision-language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.08577, 2023a.
  115. Sus-x: Training-free name-only transfer of vision-language models. In International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV), 2023b.
  116. Mobileclip: Fast image-text models through multi-modal reinforced training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.17049, 2023.
  117. The caltech-ucsd birds-200-2011 dataset. 2011.
  118. Steven Walfish. A review of statistical outlier methods. Pharmaceutical technology, 30(11):82, 2006.
  119. Sun database: Large-scale scene recognition from abbey to zoo. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2010.
  120. Cit: Curation in training for effective vision-language data, 2023a.
  121. Demystifying clip data, 2023b.
  122. Vision-language pre-training with triple contrastive learning. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2022.
  123. Data similarity is not enough to explain language model performance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.09006, 2023.
  124. From image descriptions to visual denotations: New similarity metrics for semantic inference over event descriptions. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2:67–78, 2014.
  125. Coca: Contrastive captioners are image-text foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.01917, 2022a.
  126. Scaling autoregressive models for content-rich text-to-image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.10789, 2(3):5, 2022b.
  127. Capsfusion: Rethinking image-text data at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.20550, 2023.
  128. Lit: Zero-shot transfer with locked-image text tuning. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2022.
  129. Sigmoid loss for language image pre-training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.15343, 2023.
  130. Prompt, generate, then cache: Cascade of foundation models makes strong few-shot learners. In Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2023.
  131. Low-resource vision challenges for foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.04716, 2024.
  132. George Kingsley Zipf. Human behavior and the principle of least effort: An introduction to human ecology. Ravenio books, 2016.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (8)
  1. Vishaal Udandarao (20 papers)
  2. Ameya Prabhu (37 papers)
  3. Adhiraj Ghosh (4 papers)
  4. Yash Sharma (45 papers)
  5. Philip H. S. Torr (219 papers)
  6. Adel Bibi (53 papers)
  7. Samuel Albanie (81 papers)
  8. Matthias Bethge (103 papers)
Citations (34)
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

HackerNews