Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
166 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

$Π_{2}^{P}$ vs PSpace Dichotomy for the Quantified Constraint Satisfaction Problem (2404.03844v2)

Published 5 Apr 2024 in cs.CC, cs.LO, and math.LO

Abstract: The Quantified Constraint Satisfaction Problem is the problem of evaluating a sentence with both quantifiers, over relations from some constraint language, with conjunction as the only connective. We show that for any constraint language on a finite domain the Quantified Constraint Satisfaction Problem is either in $\Pi_{2}{P}$, or PSpace-complete. Additionally, we build a constraint language on a 6-element domain such that the Quantified Constraint Satisfaction Problem over this language is $\Pi_{2}{P}$-complete.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (23)
  1. Computational complexity: a modern approach. Cambridge University Press, 2009.
  2. Polymorphisms, and how to use them. 2017. Preprint.
  3. The algebraic dichotomy conjecture for infinite domain constraint satisfaction problems. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, LICS ’16, New York, NY, USA, July 5-8, 2016, pages 615–622, 2016.
  4. The complexity of constraint satisfaction games and QCSP. Inf. Comput., 207(9):923–944, 2009.
  5. Promise constraint satisfaction: Structure theory and a symmetric boolean dichotomy. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2018, New Orleans, LA, USA, January 7-10, 2018, pages 1782–1801, 2018.
  6. Classifying the complexity of constraints using finite algebras. SIAM J. Comput., 34(3):720–742, March 2005.
  7. Andrei A. Bulatov. A dichotomy theorem for nonuniform CSPs. In 2017 IEEE 58th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pages 319–330, 2017.
  8. Andrei A. Bulatov. A dichotomy theorem for nonuniform CSPs. CoRR, abs/1703.03021, 2017.
  9. Hubie Chen. A rendezvous of logic, complexity, and algebra. SIGACT News, 37(4):85–114, 2006.
  10. Hubie Chen. The complexity of quantified constraint satisfaction: Collapsibility, sink algebras, and the three-element case. SIAM J. Comput., 37(5):1674–1701, 2008.
  11. Hubie Chen. Quantified constraint satisfaction and the polynomially generated powers property. Algebra universalis, 65(3):213–241, 2011. An extended abstract appeared in ICALP B 2008.
  12. Hubie Chen. Meditations on quantified constraint satisfaction. In Logic and Program Semantics - Essays Dedicated to Dexter Kozen on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday, pages 35–49, 2012.
  13. Peter Jeavons. On the algebraic structure of combinatorial problems. Theoretical Computer Science, 200(1-2):185–204, 1998.
  14. The complexity of general-valued CSPs. SIAM J. Comput., 46(3):1087–1110, 2017.
  15. Barnaby Martin. Quantified Constraints in Twenty Seventeen. In Andrei Krokhin and Stanislav Zivny, editors, The Constraint Satisfaction Problem: Complexity and Approximability, volume 7 of Dagstuhl Follow-Ups, pages 327–346. Schloss Dagstuhl–Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, Dagstuhl, Germany, 2017.
  16. Thomas J. Schaefer. The complexity of satisfiability problems. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC ’78, pages 216–226, New York, NY, USA, 1978. ACM.
  17. D. Zhuk. A proof of CSP dichotomy conjecture. In 2017 IEEE 58th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pages 331–342, Oct 2017.
  18. Dmitriy Zhuk. The size of generating sets of powers. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A, 167:91–103, 2019.
  19. Dmitriy Zhuk. A proof of the CSP dichotomy conjecture. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 67(5):1–78, 2020.
  20. Dmitriy Zhuk. The complexity of the quantified CSP having the polynomially generated powers property, 2021.
  21. DMITRIY ZHUK. Strong subalgebras and the constraint satisfaction problem. Journal of Multiple-Valued Logic & Soft Computing, 36, 2021.
  22. QCSP monsters and the demise of the chen conjecture. In Proceedings of the 52nd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 91–104, 2020.
  23. QCSP monsters and the demise of the chen conjecture. J. ACM, 69(5), oct 2022.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com