Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
169 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Framework for Guided Motion Planning (2404.03133v2)

Published 4 Apr 2024 in cs.RO and cs.AI

Abstract: Randomized sampling based algorithms are widely used in robot motion planning due to the problem's intractability, and are experimentally effective on a wide range of problem instances. Most variants bias their sampling using various heuristics related to the known underlying structure of the search space. In this work, we formalize the intuitive notion of guided search by defining the concept of a guiding space. This new language encapsulates many seemingly distinct prior methods under the same framework, and allows us to reason about guidance, a previously obscured core contribution of different algorithms. We suggest an information theoretic method to evaluate guidance, which experimentally matches intuition when tested on known algorithms in a variety of environments. The language and evaluation of guidance suggests improvements to existing methods, and allows for simple hybrid algorithms that combine guidance from multiple sources.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (30)
  1. Learning to search more efficiently from experience: A multi-heuristic approach. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Combinatorial Search, volume 6, pages 141–145, 2015.
  2. Multi-heuristic a. The International Journal of Robotics Research, 35(1-3):224–243, 2016.
  3. Obprm: An obstacle-based prm for 3d workspaces. In Proc. Int. Workshop on Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics (WAFR), pages 155–168, 1998.
  4. Evaluating guiding spaces for motion planning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.08640, 2022.
  5. Discrete state-action abstraction via the successor representation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.03467, 2022.
  6. Iterative relaxation of constraints: a framework for improving automated motion planning. In 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2005, pages 3433–3440. IEEE, 2005.
  7. A robot path planning framework that learns from experience. In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 3671–3678. IEEE, 2012.
  8. Learning heuristic search via imitation. In Conference on Robot Learning, pages 271–280. PMLR, 2017.
  9. Alignment-based transfer learning for robot models. In The 2013 international joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN), pages 1–7. IEEE, 2013.
  10. Path planning using lazy PRM. In International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA, pages 521–528. IEEE, 2000.
  11. Learning sampling distributions using local 3d workspace decompositions for motion planning in high dimensions. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 1283–1289. IEEE, 2021.
  12. Experience-based planning with sparse roadmap spanners. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 900–905. IEEE, 2015.
  13. Dynamic region-biased rapidly-exploring random trees. In Proceedings of the Twelfth Workshop on the Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics, WAFR 2016,, volume 13 of Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics, pages 640–655. Springer, 2016.
  14. Learning modular neural network policies for multi-task and multi-robot transfer. In 2017 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pages 2169–2176. IEEE, 2017.
  15. Prm-rl: Long-range robotic navigation tasks by combining reinforcement learning and sampling-based planning. In 2018 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pages 5113–5120. IEEE, 2018.
  16. Creating high-quality paths for motion planning. The international journal of robotics research, 26(8):845–863, 2007.
  17. Motion planning using hierarchical aggregation of workspace obstacles. In 2016 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 5716–5721. IEEE, 2016.
  18. Kris Hauser. Lazy collision checking in asymptotically-optimal motion planning. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2015, Seattle, WA, USA, 26-30 May, 2015, pages 2951–2957. IEEE, 2015.
  19. A framework for using the workspace medial axis in prm planners. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, volume 2, pages 1408–1413. IEEE, 2000.
  20. Robot motion planning in learned latent spaces. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 4(3):2407–2414, 2019.
  21. A prm-based motion planner for dynamically changing environments. In 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS)(IEEE Cat. No. 04CH37566), volume 2, pages 1606–1611. IEEE, 2004.
  22. Probabilistic roadmaps for path planning in high-dimensional configuration spaces. IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom., 12(4):566–580, 1996.
  23. Steven LaValle. Rapidly-exploring random trees: A new tool for path planning. Research Report 9811, 1998.
  24. Tomas Lozano-Perez. A simple motion-planning algorithm for general robot manipulators. IEEE Journal on Robotics and Automation, 3(3):224–238, 1987.
  25. Deformable robot motion planning in a reduced-dimension configuration space. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2010, pages 5133–5138. IEEE, 2010.
  26. Discrete search leading continuous exploration for kinodynamic motion planning. In Robotics: Science and Systems III, 2007. The MIT Press, 2007.
  27. Motion planning networks. In 2019 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 2118–2124. IEEE, 2019.
  28. Spark prm: Using rrts within prms to efficiently explore narrow passages. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 4659–4666. IEEE, 2014.
  29. Computing multiple guiding paths for sampling-based motion planning. In 19th International Conference on Advanced Robotics, ICAR 2019, pages 374–381. IEEE, 2019.
  30. Neural rrt*: Learning-based optimal path planning. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 17(4):1748–1758, 2020.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.