Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
110 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Speed, power and cost implications for GPU acceleration of Computational Fluid Dynamics on HPC systems (2404.02482v1)

Published 3 Apr 2024 in cs.DC, cs.NA, cs.PF, and math.NA

Abstract: Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) is the simulation of fluid flow undertaken with the use of computational hardware. The underlying equations are computationally challenging to solve and necessitate high performance computing (HPC) to resolve in a practical timeframe when a reasonable level of fidelity is required. The simulations are memory intensive, having previously been limited to central processing unit (CPU) solvers, as graphics processing unit (GPU) video random access memory (VRAM) was insufficient. However, with recent developments in GPU design and increases to VRAM, GPU acceleration of CPU solved workflows is now possible. At HPC scale however, many operational details are still unknown. This paper utilizes ANSYS Fluent, a leading commercial code in CFD, to investigate the compute speed, power consumption and service unit (SU) cost considerations for the GPU acceleration of CFD workflows on HPC architectures. To provide a comprehensive analysis, different CPU architectures, and GPUs have been assessed. It is seen that GPU compute speed is faster, however, the initialisation speed, power and cost performance is less clear cut. Whilst the larger A100 cards perform well with respect to power consumption, this is not observed for the V100 cards. In situations where more than one GPU is required, their adoption may not be beneficial from a power or cost perspective.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (26)
  1. M. G. Perez and E. Vakkilainen, “A comparison of turbulence models and two and three dimensional meshes for unsteady cfd ash deposition tools,” Fuel, vol. 237, no. 1, pp. 806–811, 2018.
  2. Amazon Web Services, “The future of CFD,” 2023.
  3. C. Lange, P. Barthelmas, T. Rosnitchek, S. Tremmel, and F. Rieg, “Impact of HPC and automated CFD simulation processes on virtual product development — a case study,” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 14, p. 6552, 2021.
  4. P. M. Gresho, “Some current cfd issues relevant to the incompressible navier-stokes equations,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 201–252, 1991.
  5. J. L. Guermond and P. D. Minev, “High-order time stepping for the navier–stokes equations with minimal computational complexity,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 310, no. 1, pp. 92–103, 2017.
  6. P. Spalart, “Reflections on rans modelling,” Progress in Hybrid RANS-LES Modelling, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7–24, 2010.
  7. G. Choubey and M. Tiwari, “Pedagogy for the computational approach in simulating supersonic flows,” Scramjet Combustion: Fundamentals and Advances, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 163–181, 6.
  8. B. Sun, “Revisiting the reynolds-averaged navier–stokes equations,” Open Physics, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 853–862, 2021.
  9. S. J. Lawson, M. Woodgate, R. Steiji, and G. N. Barakos, “High performance computing for challenging problems in computational fluid dynamics,” Progress in Aerospace Sciences, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 19–29, 2012.
  10. B. Papp, G. Kristof, and C. Gromke, “Application and assessment of a gpu-based les method for predicting dynamic wind loads on buildings,” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, vol. 217, no. 1, p. 104739, 2021.
  11. NVIDIA, “NVIDIA A100 tensor core GPU,” 2023.
  12. G. Petrone, “Unleashing the power of multiple gpus for CFD simulations,” 2022.
  13. S. Gross, “An engineer’s guide to the CFD hardware galaxy,” 2023.
  14. Y. Xiang, B. Yu, Q. Yuan, and D. Sun, “GPU acceleration of CFD algorithm: HSMAC and SIMPLE,” International Conference on Computational Science, vol. ICCS 2017, no. 12-14 June 2017,, pp. Zurich, Switzerland, 2017.
  15. Y. Sun, “Queue structure,” 2023.
  16. A. N. University, “Hpc systems,” 2023.
  17. S. Koziel and L. Leifsson, “Multi-level CFD-based airfoil shape optimization with automated low-fidelity model selection,” 2013 International Conference on Computer Science, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 889–898, 2013.
  18. Z. Cooper-Baldock, P. Santos, R. Brinkworth, and K. Sammut, “Payload bay berthing of underwater vehicles with a larger xluuv,” in 7th Submarine Science Technology and Engineering Conference 2023 - Proceedings SubSTEC7, pp. 97–104, Submarine Institute of Australia, Sept. 2023.
  19. M. E. Q. Pilson, “An introduction to the chemistry of the sea,” Cambridge University Press, pp. –, 2013.
  20. M. H. Sharqawy, J. H. V. Lienhard, and S. M. Zubair, “Thermophysical properties of seawater: a review of existing correlations and data,” Desalination and Water Treatment, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 354–380, 2010.
  21. F. J. Millero, G. Perron, and J. E. Desnoyers, “Heat capacity of seawater solutions from 5° to 35°c and 0.5 to 22% chlorinity,” Journal of Geophysics Research, vol. 78, no. 21, pp. 4499–4507, 1973.
  22. V. J. Castelli, E. M. Stanley, and E. C. Fischer, “The thermal conductivity of seawater as a function of pressure and temperature,” Deep Sea Research and Oceanographic Abstracts, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 311–319, 1974.
  23. J. D. Isdale, “Viscosity of simple liquids including measurement and prediction at elevated pressure,” Doctor of Philosophy, The University of Strathclyde, pp. –, 1976.
  24. H. U. Sverdrup, M. W. Johnson, and R. H. Fleming, “The oceans, their physics, chemistry and general biology,” New York, Prentice-Hall, pp. –, 1942.
  25. Biological and Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2013.
  26. F. R. Menter, “Zonal two Equation k-w turbulence models for aerodynamic flows,” AIAA Journal, vol. 32, pp. 1598–1605, July 1993.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com