Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
167 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Safe Returning FaSTrack with Robust Control Lyapunov-Value Functions (2404.02472v1)

Published 3 Apr 2024 in cs.RO, cs.SY, and eess.SY

Abstract: Real-time navigation in a priori unknown environment remains a challenging task, especially when an unexpected (unmodeled) disturbance occurs. In this paper, we propose the framework Safe Returning Fast and Safe Tracking (SR-F) that merges concepts from 1) Robust Control Lyapunov-Value Functions (R-CLVF), and 2) the Fast and Safe Tracking (FaSTrack) framework. The SR-F computes an R-CLVF offline between a model of the true system and a simplified planning model. Online, a planning algorithm is used to generate a trajectory in the simplified planning space, and the R-CLVF is used to provide a tracking controller that exponentially stabilizes to the planning model. When an unexpected disturbance occurs, the proposed SR-F algorithm provides a means for the true system to recover to the planning model. We take advantage of this mechanism to induce an artificial disturbance by ``jumping'' the planning model in open environments, forcing faster navigation. Therefore, this algorithm can both reject unexpected true disturbances and accelerate navigation speed. We validate our framework using a 10D quadrotor system and show that SR-F is empirically 20\% faster than the original FaSTrack while maintaining safety.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (23)
  1. Z. Gong and S. Herbert, “Robust control lyapunov-value functions for nonlinear disturbed systems,” https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.03455, 2024.
  2. M. Chen*, S. Herbert*, H. Hu, Y. Pu, J. Fisac, S. Bansal, S. Han, and C. Tomlin, “Fastrack: a modular framework for real-time motion planning and guaranteed safe tracking,” in Trans. on Automatic Control.   IEEE, 2020.
  3. E. W. Dijkstra, “A note on two problems in connection with graphs,” in Edsger Wybe Dijkstra: His Life, Work, and Legacy, 2022.
  4. P. E. Hart, N. J. Nilsson, and B. Raphael, “A formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths,” Trans. on Systems Science and Cybernetics, 1968.
  5. J. Bruce and M. Veloso, “Real-time randomized path planning for robot navigation,” in International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.   IEEE, 2002.
  6. A. Stentz et al., “The focused D^* algorithm for real-time replanning,” in International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence, 1995.
  7. M. Likhachev, D. I. Ferguson, G. J. Gordon, A. Stentz, and S. Thrun, “Anytime dynamic a*: An anytime, replanning algorithm,” in International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, 2005.
  8. P. Bouffard, “On-board model predictive control of a quadrotor helicopter: Design, implementation, and experiments,” Master’s thesis, EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley, Dec 2012.
  9. J. M. Bravo, T. Alamo, and E. F. Camacho, “Robust mpc of constrained discrete-time nonlinear systems based on approximated reachable sets,” Automatica, 2006.
  10. K. K. Hassan et al., “Nonlinear systems,” Departement of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Michigan State University, 2002.
  11. Z. Artstein, “Stabilization with relaxed controls,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, 1983.
  12. E. D. Sontag, “A ‘universal’ construction of Artstein’s theorem on nonlinear stabilization,” Systems & control letters, 1989.
  13. A. D. Ames, S. Coogan, M. Egerstedt, G. Notomista, K. Sreenath, and P. Tabuada, “Control barrier functions: Theory and applications,” in European Control Conf.   IEEE, 2019.
  14. L. C. Evans and P. E. Souganidis, “Differential games and representation formulas for solutions of Hamilton-Jacobi-Isaacs equations,” Indiana University Mathematics Journal, 1984.
  15. S. Bansal, M. Chen, S. Herbert, and C. J. Tomlin, “Hamilton-jacobi reachability: A brief overview and recent advances,” in Conference on Decision and Control.   IEEE, 2017.
  16. J. F. Fisac, M. Chen, C. J. Tomlin, and S. S. Sastry, “Reach-avoid problems with time-varying dynamics, targets and constraints,” in Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control.   ACM, 2015.
  17. F. S. Barbosa, L. Lindemann, D. V. Dimarogonas, and J. Tumova, “Provably safe control of lagrangian systems in obstacle-scattered environments,” in Conference on Decision and Control.   IEEE, 2020.
  18. A. Manjunath and Q. Nguyen, “Safe and robust motion planning for dynamic robotics via control barrier functions,” in Conference on Decision and Control.   IEEE, 2021.
  19. Z. Li and N. Atanasov, “Governor-parameterized barrier function for safe output tracking with locally sensed constraints,” Automatica, 2023.
  20. D. Fridovich-Keil, S. L. Herbert, J. F. Fisac, S. Deglurkar, and C. J. Tomlin, “Planning, fast and slow: A framework for adaptive real-time safe trajectory planning,” in International Conference on Robotics and Automation.   IEEE, 2018.
  21. A. Sahraeekhanghah and M. Chen, “Pa-fastrack: Planner-aware real-time guaranteed safe planning,” in Conference on Decision and Control.   IEEE, 2021.
  22. Gavin, “Multiple rapidly-exploring random tree (rrt),” https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/21443-multiple-rapidly-exploring-random-tree-rrt, 2024.
  23. C. He, Z. Gong, M. Chen, and S. Herbert, “Efficient and guaranteed hamilton–jacobi reachability via self-contained subsystem decomposition and admissible control sets,” Control Systems Letters, 2023.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.