Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

The Effects of Group Sanctions on Participation and Toxicity: Quasi-experimental Evidence from the Fediverse (2404.02109v1)

Published 2 Apr 2024 in cs.SI and cs.HC

Abstract: Online communities often overlap and coexist, despite incongruent norms and approaches to content moderation. When communities diverge, decentralized and federated communities may pursue group-level sanctions, including defederation (disconnection) to block communication between members of specific communities. We investigate the effects of defederation in the context of the Fediverse, a set of decentralized, interconnected social networks with independent governance. Mastodon and Pleroma, the most popular software powering the Fediverse, allow administrators on one server to defederate from another. We use a difference-in-differences approach and matched controls to estimate the effects of defederation events on participation and message toxicity among affected members of the blocked and blocking servers. We find that defederation causes a drop in activity for accounts on the blocked servers, but not on the blocking servers. Also, we find no evidence of an effect of defederation on message toxicity.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (32)
  1. Error and Attack Tolerance of Complex Networks. Nature, 406(6794): 378–382.
  2. Understanding the Effect of Deplatforming on Social Networks. In Proceedings of the 13th ACM Web Science Conference 2021, WebSci ’21, 187–195. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery. ISBN 978-1-4503-8330-1.
  3. Cross-Platform Reactions to the Post-January 6 Deplatforming. Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media, 3.
  4. Quarantined! Examining the Effects of a Community-Wide Moderation Intervention on Reddit. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 29(4): 29:1–29:26.
  5. You Can’t Stay Here: The Efficacy of Reddit’s 2015 Ban Examined through Hate Speech. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., 1(CSCW): 31:1–31:22.
  6. Decentralized Online Social Networks. In Furht, B., ed., Handbook of Social Network Technologies and Applications, 349–378. New York, NY: Springer US. ISBN 978-1-4419-7142-5.
  7. Effective Voice: Beyond Exit and Affect in Online Communities. New Media & Society, 14614448211044025.
  8. Emergence of Integrated Institutions in a Large Population of Self-Governing Communities. PLOS ONE, 14(7): e0216335.
  9. Connective and Communal Public Goods in Interactive Communication Systems. Communication Theory, 6(1): 60–87.
  10. Gillespie, T. 2018. Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-17313-0.
  11. Trust and Safety on Social Media: Understanding the Impact of Anti-Social Behavior and Misinformation on Content Moderation and Platform Governance. Social Media + Society, 9(3): 20563051231196878.
  12. On the Infrastructure Providers That Support Misinformation Websites. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 16: 287–298.
  13. Heckathorn, D. D. 1988. Collective Sanctions and the Creation of Prisoner’s Dilemma Norms. American Journal of Sociology, 94(3): 535–562.
  14. The Hidden Costs of Requiring Accounts: Quasi-experimental Evidence from Peer Production. Communication Research, 48(6): 771–795.
  15. Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1): 1–24.
  16. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Deplatforming as a Moderation Strategy on Twitter. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW2): 381:1–381:30.
  17. Jigsaw. 2021. Perspective API. https://www.perspectiveapi.com/.
  18. Kaye, D. 2019. Speech Police: The Global Struggle to Govern the Internet. New York: Columbia Global Reports. ISBN 978-0-9997454-8-9.
  19. How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression. American Political Science Review, 107(2).
  20. Removal of Anti-Vaccine Content Impacts Social Media Discourse. In 14th ACM Web Science Conference 2022, 319–326. Barcelona Spain: ACM. ISBN 978-1-4503-9191-7.
  21. Myers West, S. 2018. Censored, Suspended, Shadowbanned: User Interpretations of Content Moderation on Social Media Platforms. New Media & Society, 20(11): 4366–4383.
  22. Deplatforming Did Not Decrease Parler Users’ Activity on Fringe Social Media. PNAS Nexus, 2(3): pgad035.
  23. Do Platform Migrations Compromise Content Moderation? Evidence from r/The_donald and r/Incels. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW2): 316:1–316:24.
  24. Spillover of Antisocial Behavior from Fringe Platforms: The Unintended Consequences of Community Banning. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 17: 742–753.
  25. Shaping Pro and Anti-Social Behavior on Twitch Through Moderation and Example-Setting. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, CSCW ’17, 111–125. New York, NY, USA: ACM. ISBN 978-1-4503-4335-0.
  26. Content Removal as a Moderation Strategy: Compliance and Other Outcomes in the Changemyview Community. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 3(CSCW): 163:1–163:21.
  27. The Role of Alternative Social Media in the News and Information Environment. Technical report, Pew Research Center, Washington D.C.
  28. Misclassification in Automated Content Analysis Causes Bias in Regression. Can We Fix It? Yes We Can! Communication Methods and Measures, 18(1).
  29. The Risks, Benefits, and Consequences of Prepublication Moderation: Evidence from 17 Wikipedia Language Editions. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6: 1–25.
  30. Van Hove, L. 2016. Testing Metcalfe’s Law: Pitfalls and Possibilities. Information Economics and Policy, 37: 67–76.
  31. No Easy Way Out: The Effectiveness of Deplatforming an Extremist Forum to Suppress Hate and Harassment. arxiv:2304.07037.
  32. Group Size and Incentives to Contribute: A Natural Experiment at Chinese Wikipedia. American Economic Review, 101(4): 1601–1615.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Carl Colglazier (2 papers)
  2. Nathan TeBlunthuis (9 papers)
  3. Aaron Shaw (9 papers)
Citations (1)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets