Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
162 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Temporal Graph Model to Study the Dynamics of Collective Behavior and Performance in Team Sports: An Application to Basketball (2404.01909v1)

Published 2 Apr 2024 in cs.DM

Abstract: In this study, a temporal graph model is designed to model the behavior of collective sports teams based on the networks of player interactions. The main motivation for the model is to integrate the temporal dimension into the analysis of players' passing networks in order to gain deeper insights into the dynamics of system behavior, particularly how a system exploits the degeneracy property to self-regulate. First, the temporal graph model and the entropy measures used to assess the complexity of the dynamics of the network structure are introduced and illustrated. Second, an experiment using basketball data is conducted to investigate the relationship between the complexity level and team performance. This is accomplished by examining the correlations between the entropy measures in a team's behavior and the team's final performance, as well as the link between the relative score compared to that of the opponent and the entropy in the team's behavior. Results indicate positive correlations between entropy measures and final team performance, and threshold values of relative score associated with changes in team behavior -- thereby revealing common and unique team signatures. From a complexity science perspective, the model proves useful for identifying key performance factors in team sports and for studying the effects of given constraints on the exploitation of degeneracy to organize team behavior through various network structures. Future research can easily extend the model and apply it to other types of social networks.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (56)
  1. Extending the applicability of graphlets to directed networks. IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics, 14(6):1302–1315.
  2. Team decision-making behavior: An ecological dynamics approach. Asian Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology.
  3. Overview of complex systems in sport. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 26:4–13.
  4. Networks beyond pairwise interactions: Structure and dynamics. Physics Reports, 874:1–92.
  5. Flow motifs in soccer: What can passing behavior tell us? Journal of Sports Analytics, 5(4):299–311.
  6. Defining a historic football team: Using network science to analyze guardiola’s fc barcelona. Scientific reports, 9(1):13602.
  7. Motor characteristics of fast break in high level basketball. Kinesiology, 47(2.):208–214. https://hrcak.srce.hr/150548.
  8. Casteigts, A. (2018). A Journey through Dynamic Networks (with Excursions). Habilitation à diriger des recherches, Université de Bordeaux.
  9. The haka network: Evaluating rugby team performance with dynamic graph analysis. In 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), pages 1095–1102.
  10. Network analysis in basketball: Inspecting the prominent players using centrality metrics. Journal of physical education and sport, 15(2):212.
  11. From recording discrete actions to studying continuous goal-directed behaviours in team sports. Journal of sports sciences, 31(5):546–553.
  12. Collective behaviour in basketball: a systematic review. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 17(1-2):44–64.
  13. Sports teams as superorganisms: Implications of sociobiological models of behaviour for research and practice in team sports performance analysis. Sports medicine, 42:633–642.
  14. Degeneracy and complexity in biological systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(24):13763–13768.
  15. Basketball teams as strategic networks. PloS one, 7(11):e47445.
  16. Degeneracy and redundancy in cognitive anatomy. Trends in cognitive sciences, 7(4):151–152.
  17. Homogeneous distribution of passing between players of a team predicts attempts to shoot at goal in association football: A case study with 10 matches. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology & Life Sciences, 24(3). https://shura.shu.ac.uk/id/eprint/26912.
  18. Holme, P. (2015). Modern temporal network theory: a colloquium. The European Physical Journal B, 88:1–30.
  19. Temporal networks. Physics reports, 519(3):97–125.
  20. Exploring the structure and function of temporal networks with dynamic graphlets. Bioinformatics, 31(12):i171–i180.
  21. Korte, F. (2019). Network Analysis in Team Sports. PhD thesis, Technische Universität München.
  22. Characterizing different team sports using network analysis. Current Issues in Sport Science (CISS), 3:005–005.
  23. Discovering recurring activity in temporal networks. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 31(6):1840–1871.
  24. Gaze transition entropy. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP), 13(1):1–20.
  25. Sequential motifs in observed walks. Journal of Complex Networks, 10(5):cnac036.
  26. How do soccer teams coordinate consecutive passes? a visual analytics system for analysing the complexity of passing sequences using soccer flow motifs. Computers & Graphics, 84:122–133.
  27. Spatial and temporal entropies in the spanish football league: A network science perspective. Entropy, 22(2):172.
  28. Node and network entropy—a novel mathematical model for pattern analysis of team sports behavior. Mathematics, 8(9):1543.
  29. Hidden in plain view: degeneracy in complex systems. Biosystems, 128:1–8.
  30. Trajectories through temporal networks. Applied Network Science, 6(1):35.
  31. McCrum-Gardner, E. (2008). Which is the correct statistical test to use? British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 46(1):38–41.
  32. Sport competition as a dynamical self-organizing system. Journal of sports sciences, 20(10):771–781.
  33. Meza, D. A. P. (2017). Flow network motifs applied to soccer passing data. In Proceedings of MathSport international 2017 conference, page 305.
  34. Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. Science, 298(5594):824–827.
  35. Effects of starting quarter score, game location, and quality of opposition in quarter score in elite women’s basketball. Kinesiology, 45(1.):48–54. https://hrcak.srce.hr/104547.
  36. The adaptive behavior of a soccer team: An entropy-based analysis. Entropy, 20(10):758.
  37. Newman, M. E. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM review, 45(2):167–256.
  38. Detecting dynamic patterns in dynamic graphs using subgraph isomorphism. Pattern Analysis and Applications, pages 1–17.
  39. How does match status affects the passing sequences of top-level european soccer teams? International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, 15(1):229–240.
  40. Motifs in temporal networks. In Proceedings of the tenth ACM international conference on web search and data mining, pages 601–610.
  41. The soccer game, bit by bit: An information-theoretic analysis. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 152:111356.
  42. Weighted network motifs as random walk patterns. New Journal of Physics, 24(5):053056.
  43. Modeling interactome: scale-free or geometric? Bioinformatics, 20(18):3508–3515.
  44. What’s next in complex networks? capturing the concept of attacking play in invasive team sports. Sports medicine, 48:17–28.
  45. Effects of starting score-line, game location, and quality of opposition in basketball quarter score. European Journal of Sport Science, 10(6):391–396.
  46. Understanding constraints on sport performance from the complexity sciences paradigm: An ecological dynamics framework. Human movement science, 56:178–180.
  47. Shannon, C. E. (1948). A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3):379–423.
  48. Skinner, B. (2010). The price of anarchy in basketball. Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, 6(1).
  49. A decade of euroleague basketball: An analysis of trends and recent rule change effects. Journal of human kinetics, 38(2013):183–189.
  50. Measures of degeneracy and redundancy in biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96(6):3257–3262.
  51. A study of connectivity on dynamic graphs: computing persistent connected components. 4OR, 21(2):205–233.
  52. Collective states and their transitions in football. Plos one, 16(5):e0251970.
  53. Whitacre, J. M. (2010). Degeneracy: a link between evolvability, robustness and complexity in biological systems. Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling, 7:1–17.
  54. A continuous-time stochastic block model for basketball networks. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 11(2).
  55. Common and unique network dynamics in football games. PloS one, 6(12):e29638.
  56. Big data analytics for modeling scoring probability in basketball: The effect of shooting under high-pressure conditions. International journal of sports science & coaching, 13(4):569–589.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com