Some Orders Are Important: Partially Preserving Orders in Top-Quality Planning (2404.01503v1)
Abstract: The ability to generate multiple plans is central to using planning in real-life applications. Top-quality planners generate sets of such top-cost plans, allowing flexibility in determining equivalent ones. In terms of the order between actions in a plan, the literature only considers two extremes -- either all orders are important, making each plan unique, or all orders are unimportant, treating two plans differing only in the order of actions as equivalent. To allow flexibility in selecting important orders, we propose specifying a subset of actions the orders between which are important, interpolating between the top-quality and unordered top-quality planning problems. We explore the ways of adapting partial order reduction search pruning techniques to address this new computational problem and present experimental evaluations demonstrating the benefits of exploiting such techniques in this setting.
- A Stubborn Set Algorithm for Optimal Planning. In De Raedt, L.; Bessiere, C.; Dubois, D.; Doherty, P.; Frasconi, P.; Heintz, F.; and Lucas, P., eds., Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2012), 891–892. IOS Press.
- Complexity Results for SAS+{}^{+}start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT + end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT Planning. Computational Intelligence, 11(4): 625–655.
- Proceedings of the 16th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Search (SoCS 2023). AAAI Press.
- Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2020). AAAI Press.
- The benchmark domains of the deterministic part of IPC-5. In Fifth International Planning Competition (IPC-5): Planner Abstracts, 14–19.
- Helmert, M. 2006. The Fast Downward Planning System. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 26: 191–246.
- Landmarks, Critical Paths and Abstractions: What’s the Difference Anyway? In Gerevini, A.; Howe, A.; Cesta, A.; and Refanidis, I., eds., Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS 2009), 162–169. AAAI Press.
- K* and Partial Order Reduction for Top-quality Planning. In (Barták, Ruml, and Salzman 2023).
- K* Search Over Orbit Space for Top-k Planning. In Elkind, E., ed., Proceedings of the 32nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2023). IJCAI.
- Unifying and Certifying Top-Quality Planning. In Bernardini, S.; and Muise, C., eds., Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS 2024). AAAI Press.
- Reshaping Diverse Planning. In (Conitzer and Sha 2020), 9892–9899.
- Top-Quality Planning: Finding Practically Useful Sets of Best Plans. In (Conitzer and Sha 2020), 9900–9907.
- A Novel Iterative Approach to Top-k Planning. In de Weerdt, M.; Koenig, S.; Röger, G.; and Spaan, M., eds., Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS 2018), 132–140. AAAI Press.
- Soft Goals Can Be Compiled Away. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 36: 547–556.
- On K* Search for Top-k Planning. In (Barták, Ruml, and Salzman 2023).
- Generating diverse plans to handle unknown and partially known user preferences. Artificial Intelligence, 190: 1–31.
- An Atom-Centric Perspective on Stubborn Sets. In Harabor, D.; and Vallati, M., eds., Proceedings of the 13th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Search (SoCS 2020), 57–65. AAAI Press.
- Symbolic Top-k Planning. In (Conitzer and Sha 2020), 9967–9974.
- About Partial Order Reduction in Planning and Computer Aided Verification. In McCluskey, L.; Williams, B.; Silva, J. R.; and Bonet, B., eds., Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS 2012), 297–305. AAAI Press.
- Efficient Stubborn Sets: Generalized Algorithms and Selection Strategies. In Chien, S.; Fern, A.; Ruml, W.; and Do, M., eds., Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS 2014), 323–331. AAAI Press.