Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
169 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Settling the Communication Complexity of VCG-based Mechanisms for all Approximation Guarantees (2404.00831v1)

Published 31 Mar 2024 in cs.GT

Abstract: We consider truthful combinatorial auctions with items $M = [m]$ for sale to $n$ bidders, where each bidder $i$ has a private monotone valuation $v_i : 2M \to R_+$. Among truthful mechanisms, maximal-in-range (MIR) mechanisms achieve the best-known approximation guarantees among all poly-communication deterministic truthful mechanisms in all previously-studied settings. Our work settles the communication necessary to achieve any approximation guarantee via an MIR mechanism. Specifically: Let MIRsubmod$(m,k)$ denote the best approximation guarantee achievable by an MIR mechanism using $2k$ communication between bidders with submodular valuations over $m$ items. Then for all $k = \Omega(\log(m))$, MIRsubmod$(m,k) = \Omega(\sqrt{m/(k\log(m/k))})$. When $k = \Theta(\log(m))$, this improves the previous best lower bound for poly-comm. MIR mechanisms from $\Omega(m{1/3}/\log{2/3}(m))$ to $\Omega(\sqrt{m}/\log(m))$. We also have MIRsubmod$(m,k) = O(\sqrt{m/k})$. Moreover, our mechanism is optimal w.r.t. the value query and succinct representation models. When $k = \Theta(\log(m))$, this improves the previous best approximation guarantee for poly-comm. MIR mechanisms from $O(\sqrt{m})$ to $O(\sqrt{m/\log(m)})$. Let also MIRgen$(m,k)$ denote the best approximation guarantee achievable by an MIR mechanism using $2k$ communication between bidders with general valuations over $m$ items. Then for all $k = \Omega(\log(m))$, MIRgen$(m,k) = \Omega(m/k)$. When $k = \Theta(\log(m))$, this improves the previous best lower bound for poly-comm. MIR mechanisms from $\Omega(m/\log2(m))$ to $\Omega(m/\log(m))$. We also have MIRgen$(m,k) = O(m/k)$. Moreover, our mechanism is optimal w.r.t. the value query and succinct representation models. When $k = \Theta(\log(m))$, this improves the previous best approximation guarantee for poly-comm. MIR mechanisms from $O(m/\sqrt{\log(m)})$ to $O(m/\log(m))$.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (41)
  1. Improved truthful mechanisms for subadditive combinatorial auctions: Breaking the logarithmic barrier. In Dániel Marx, editor, Proceedings of the 2021 ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2021, Virtual Conference, January 10 - 13, 2021, pages 653–661. SIAM, 2021.
  2. Separating the communication complexity of truthful and non-truthful combinatorial auctions. In Konstantin Makarychev, Yury Makarychev, Madhur Tulsiani, Gautam Kamath, and Julia Chuzhoy, editors, Proccedings of the 52nd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2020, Chicago, IL, USA, June 22-26, 2020, pages 1073–1085. ACM, 2020.
  3. Exponentially improved truthful combinatorial auctions with submodular bidders. In Proceedings of the Sixtieth Annual IEEE Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 2019.
  4. Sepehr Assadi. Combinatorial auctions do need modest interaction. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, EC ’17, Cambridge, MA, USA, June 26-30, 2017, pages 145–162, 2017.
  5. Inapproximability for VCG-Based Combinatorial Auctions. In Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), 2010.
  6. On simultaneous two-player combinatorial auctions. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2018, New Orleans, LA, USA, January 7-10, 2018, pages 2256–2273, 2018.
  7. On the computational power of iterative auctions. In John Riedl, Michael J. Kearns, and Michael K. Reiter, editors, Proceedings 6th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC-2005), Vancouver, BC, Canada, June 5-8, 2005, pages 29–43. ACM, 2005.
  8. Edward H. Clarke. Multipart Pricing of Public Goods. Public Choice, 11(1):17–33, 1971.
  9. Limitations of VCG-based mechanisms. Comb., 31(4):379–396, 2011.
  10. Economic efficiency requires interaction. In the 46th annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing (STOC), 2014.
  11. Truthful randomized mechanisms for combinatorial auctions. In Jon M. Kleinberg, editor, Proceedings of the 38th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, Seattle, WA, USA, May 21-23, 2006, pages 644–652. ACM, 2006.
  12. Approximation algorithms for combinatorial auctions with complement-free bidders. Math. Oper. Res., 35(1):1–13, 2010. https://www.cs.yale.edu/homes/schapira/cfjournal.pdf.
  13. Shahar Dobzinski. Two randomized mechanisms for combinatorial auctions. In Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Approximation and the 11th International Workshop on Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques, pages 89–103, 2007.
  14. Shahar Dobzinski. An Impossibility Result for Truthful Combinatorial Auctions with Submodular Valuations. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), 2011.
  15. Shahar Dobzinski. Breaking the logarithmic barrier for truthful combinatorial auctions with submodular bidders. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2016, pages 940–948, New York, NY, USA, 2016. ACM.
  16. Shahar Dobzinski. Computational efficiency requires simple taxation. In FOCS, 2016.
  17. Balls and bins: A study in negative dependence. Random Struct. Algorithms, 13(2):99–124, 1998.
  18. On the hardness of dominant strategy mechanism design. In Stefano Leonardi and Anupam Gupta, editors, STOC ’22: 54th Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing, Rome, Italy, June 20 - 24, 2022, pages 690–703. ACM, 2022.
  19. Inapproximability of truthful mechanisms via generalizations of the VC dimension. In Proceedings of the Forty-Seventh Annual ACM on Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2015, Portland, OR, USA, June 14-17, 2015, pages 401–408, 2015.
  20. Limitations of Randomized Mechanisms for Combinatorial Auctions. In 52nd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 2011.
  21. From query complexity to computational complexity. In Proceedings of the 44th Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), 2012.
  22. The Computational Complexity of Truthfulness in Combinatorial Auctions. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC), 2012.
  23. Communication complexity of combinatorial auctions with submodular valuations. In Sanjeev Khanna, editor, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2013, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, January 6-8, 2013, pages 1205–1215. SIAM, 2013. https://theory.stanford.edu/~jvondrak/data/submod-comm.pdf.
  24. Impossibility results for truthful combinatorial auctions with submodular valuations. J. ACM, 63(1):5:1–5:19, 2016.
  25. Settling the communication complexity of combinatorial auctions with two subadditive buyers. In the 60th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), 2019. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1811.09871.pdf.
  26. Uriel Feige. On maximizing welfare when utility functions are subadditive. SIAM J. Comput., 39(1):122–142, 2009. http://www.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il/~feige/mypapers/subadditive.pdf.
  27. The submodular welfare problem with demand queries. Theory of Computing, 6(1):247–290, 2010. https://theory.stanford.edu/~jvondrak/data/submod-improve-ToC.pdf.
  28. Theodore Groves. Incentives in Teams. Econometrica, 41(4):617–631, 1973.
  29. Bundling equilibrium in combinatorial auctions. Games and Economic Behavior, 47(1):104–123, 2004.
  30. Negative association of random variables with applications. The Annals of Statistics, 11(1):286–295, 1983.
  31. Online mechanism design (randomized rounding on the fly). In Automata, Languages, and Programming, pages 636–647. Springer, 2012.
  32. Combinatorial auctions with decreasing marginal utilities. In the 3rd Annual ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC), 2001.
  33. Towards a characterization of truthful combinatorial auctions. In 44th Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 2003), 11-14 October 2003, Cambridge, MA, USA, Proceedings, pages 574–583. IEEE Computer Society, 2003.
  34. Truth revelation in approximately efficient combinatorial auctions. J. ACM, 49(5):577–602, 2002.
  35. Tight information-theoretic lower bounds for welfare maximization in combinatorial auctions. In Proceedings 9th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC-2008), Chicago, IL, USA, June 8-12, 2008, pages 70–77, 2008.
  36. Noam Nisan. The communication complexity of approximate set packing and covering. In Peter Widmayer, Francisco Triguero Ruiz, Rafael Morales Bueno, Matthew Hennessy, Stephan J. Eidenbenz, and Ricardo Conejo, editors, Automata, Languages and Programming, 29th International Colloquium, ICALP 2002, Malaga, Spain, July 8-13, 2002, Proceedings, volume 2380 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 868–875. Springer, 2002.
  37. Computationally feasible VCG mechanisms. J. Artif. Intell. Res., 29:19–47, 2007.
  38. The communication requirements of efficient allocations and supporting prices. J. Economic Theory, 129(1):192–224, 2006.
  39. Arrangements of hyperplanes, volume 300. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
  40. William Vickrey. Counterspeculations, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders. Journal of Finance, 16(1):8–37, 1961.
  41. Jan Vondrák. Optimal approximation for the submodular welfare problem in the value oracle model. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, May 17-20, 2008, pages 67–74, 2008.
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com