Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
139 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Tools and Tasks in Sensemaking: A Visual Accessibility Perspective (2404.00192v1)

Published 29 Mar 2024 in cs.HC

Abstract: Our previous interview study explores the needs and uses of diagrammatic information by the Blind and Low Vision (BLV) community, resulting in a framework called the Ladder of Diagram Access. The framework outlines five levels of information access when interacting with a diagram. In this paper, we connect this framework to include the global activity of sensemaking and discuss its (in)accessibility to the BLV demographic. We also discuss the integration of this framework into the sensemaking process and explore the current sensemaking practices and strategies employed by the BLV community, the challenges they face at different levels of the ladder, and potential solutions to enhance inclusivity towards a data-driven workforce.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (11)
  1. Charles Berret and Tamara Munzner. 2023. Iceberg Sensemaking: A Process Model for Critical Data Analysis and Visualization. arXiv:2204.04758 (Aug. 2023). http://arxiv.org/abs/2204.04758 arXiv:2204.04758 [cs].
  2. Toward a Deeper Understanding of Data Analysis, Sensemaking, and Signature Discovery. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 9297. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 463–478. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22668-2_36
  3. Jill H. Larkin and Herbert A. Simon. 1987. Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words. Cognitive Science 11, 1 (1987), 65–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6708.1987.tb00863.x
  4. Inger Marie Lid. 2014. Universal Design and disability: an interdisciplinary perspective. Disability and Rehabilitation 36, 16 (Aug. 2014), 1344–1349. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2014.931472
  5. Richard E. Mayer. 2002. Multimedia learning. Vol. 41. Academic Press, 85–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(02)80005-6
  6. Peter Pirolli and Stuart Card. 2005. The sensemaking process and leverage points for analyst technology as identified through cognitive task analysis.
  7. Daniel M. Russell. 2003. Learning to see, seeing to learn: visual aspects of sensemaking, Bernice E. Rogowitz and Thrasyvoulos N. Pappas (Eds.). Santa Clara, CA, 8. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.501132
  8. The cost structure of sensemaking. In Proceedings of the INTERACT ’93 and CHI ’93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’93). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 269–276. https://doi.org/10.1145/169059.169209
  9. Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking. Organization Science 16, 4 (Aug. 2005), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
  10. Yichun Zhao. 2023. Designing TADA: Touch-and-Audio-based Diagram Access for People with Visual Impairments. Thesis. https://dspace.library.uvic.ca/handle/1828/15291 Accepted: 2023-08-25T22:58:09Z.
  11. TADA: Making Node-link Diagrams Accessible to Blind and Low-Vision People. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’24), May 11–16, 2024, Honolulu, HI, USA. ACM, Honolulu, HI, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642222

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets