Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Advancing Explainable Autonomous Vehicle Systems: A Comprehensive Review and Research Roadmap (2404.00019v1)

Published 19 Mar 2024 in cs.HC, cs.AI, cs.LG, and cs.RO

Abstract: Given the uncertainty surrounding how existing explainability methods for autonomous vehicles (AVs) meet the diverse needs of stakeholders, a thorough investigation is imperative to determine the contexts requiring explanations and suitable interaction strategies. A comprehensive review becomes crucial to assess the alignment of current approaches with the varied interests and expectations within the AV ecosystem. This study presents a review to discuss the complexities associated with explanation generation and presentation to facilitate the development of more effective and inclusive explainable AV systems. Our investigation led to categorising existing literature into three primary topics: explanatory tasks, explanatory information, and explanatory information communication. Drawing upon our insights, we have proposed a comprehensive roadmap for future research centred on (i) knowing the interlocutor, (ii) generating timely explanations, (ii) communicating human-friendly explanations, and (iv) continuous learning. Our roadmap is underpinned by principles of responsible research and innovation, emphasising the significance of diverse explanation requirements. To effectively tackle the challenges associated with implementing explainable AV systems, we have delineated various research directions, including the development of privacy-preserving data integration, ethical frameworks, real-time analytics, human-centric interaction design, and enhanced cross-disciplinary collaborations. By exploring these research directions, the study aims to guide the development and deployment of explainable AVs, informed by a holistic understanding of user needs, technological advancements, regulatory compliance, and ethical considerations, thereby ensuring safer and more trustworthy autonomous driving experiences.

PDF HTML Abstract
Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Bookmark Chat Bubble Oval Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Chat (Pro)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (199)
  1. Towards explainable semantic segmentation for autonomous driving systems by multi-scale variational attention. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Autonomous Systems (ICAS), pages 1–5. IEEE, 2021.
  2. Interpretable goal-based prediction and planning for autonomous driving. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 1043–1049. IEEE, 2021.
  3. Imran Ali. Personality traits, individual innovativeness and satisfaction with life. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4(1):38–46, 2019.
  4. Explainable artificial intelligence for autonomous driving: A comprehensive overview and field guide for future research directions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.11561, 2021.
  5. Anticipated emotions associated with trust in autonomous vehicles. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, volume 66, pages 199–203. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 2022.
  6. Investigating hmis to foster communications between conventional vehicles and autonomous vehicles in intersections. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.17769, 2023.
  7. An investigation of drivers’ dynamic situational trust in conditionally automated driving. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 52(3):501–511, 2021.
  8. How internal and external risks affect the relationships between trust and driver behavior in automated driving systems. Transportation research part C: emerging technologies, 123:102973, 2021.
  9. Discovering and understanding algorithmic biases in autonomous pedestrian trajectory predictions. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pages 1155–1161, 2022.
  10. Feedbacklogs: Recording and incorporating stakeholder feedback into machine learning pipelines. arXiv e-prints, pages arXiv–2307, 2023.
  11. Driving behavior explanation with multi-level fusion. Pattern Recognition, 123:108421, 2022.
  12. From hmi to hmis: Towards an hmi framework for automated driving. Information, 11(2):61, 2020.
  13. A rule-based behaviour planner for autonomous driving. In International Joint Conference on Rules and Reasoning, pages 263–279. Springer, 2022.
  14. Grit: Fast, interpretable, and verifiable goal recognition with learned decision trees for autonomous driving. In 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 1023–1030. IEEE, 2021.
  15. Definitions and conceptual dimensions of responsible research and innovation: A literature review. Science and engineering ethics, 23:1–19, 2017.
  16. Risk-aware controller for autonomous vehicles using model-based collision prediction and reinforcement learning. Artificial Intelligence, 320:103923, 2023.
  17. Scout: Socially-consistent and understandable graph attention network for trajectory prediction of vehicles and vrus. In 2021 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pages 1501–1508. IEEE, 2021.
  18. Exploration of explainable ai in context of human-machine interface for the assistive driving system. In Asian Conference on Intelligent Information and Database Systems, pages 507–516. Springer, 2020.
  19. Xdll: Explained deep learning lidar-based localization and mapping method for self-driving vehicles. Electronics, 12(3):567, 2023.
  20. Manipulating music to communicate automation reliability in conditionally automated driving: A driving simulator study. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 145:102518, 2021.
  21. Situation awareness-based agent transparency and human-autonomy teaming effectiveness. Theoretical issues in ergonomics science, 19(3):259–282, 2018.
  22. Adding visual contextual information to continuous sonification feedback about low-reliability situations in conditionally automated driving: A driving simulator study. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 94:25–41, 2023.
  23. Investigating the importance of trust on adopting an autonomous vehicle. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(10):692–702, 2015.
  24. Investigating the design of information presentation in take-over requests in automated vehicles. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Mobile Human-Computer Interaction, pages 1–15, 2021.
  25. How should automated vehicles communicate critical situations? a comparative analysis of visualization concepts. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 5(3):1–23, 2021.
  26. Investigating the effects of external communication and automation behavior on manual drivers at intersections. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(MHCI):1–16, 2022.
  27. Effects of scene detection, scene prediction, and maneuver planning visualizations on trust, situation awareness, and cognitive load in highly automated vehicles. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 6(2):1–21, 2022.
  28. Scalability in external communication of automated vehicles: Evaluation and recommendations. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 7(2):1–26, 2023.
  29. Commentary training improves responsiveness to hazards in a driving simulator. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42(6):2117–2124, 2010.
  30. A survey on multimodal large language models for autonomous driving. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pages 958–979, 2024.
  31. Interface concepts for intent communication from autonomous vehicles to vulnerable road users. In Adjunct proceedings of the 10th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications, pages 82–86, 2018.
  32. Taming the ehmi jungle: A classification taxonomy to guide, compare, and assess the design principles of automated vehicles’ external human-machine interfaces. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 7:100174, 2020.
  33. Information expectations in highly and fully automated vehicles. In Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation: Proceedings of the AHFE 2017 International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation, July 17- 21, 2017, The Westin Bonaventure Hotel, Los Angeles, California, USA 8, pages 742–748. Springer, 2018.
  34. Evaluation of multimodal external human–machine interface for driverless vehicles in virtual reality. Symmetry, 13(4):687, 2021.
  35. Voice user interface interaction design research based on user mental model in autonomous vehicle. In Human-Computer Interaction. Interaction Technologies: 20th International Conference, HCI International 2018, Las Vegas, NV, USA, July 15–20, 2018, Proceedings, Part III 20, pages 117–132. Springer, 2018.
  36. Look who’s talking now: Implications of av’s explanations on driver’s trust, av preference, anxiety and mental workload. Transportation research part C: emerging technologies, 104:428–442, 2019.
  37. Designing alert systems in takeover transitions: The effects of display information and modality. In 13th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pages 173–180, 2021.
  38. On the forces of driver distraction: Explainable predictions for the visual demand of in-vehicle touchscreen interactions. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 183:106956, 2023.
  39. EC. European Commission - Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai, 2019. [Accessed 13-03-2024].
  40. Cross-cultural differences in the acceptance of decisions of automated vehicles. Applied Ergonomics, 92:103346, 2021.
  41. The impact of different human-machine interface feedback modalities on older participants’ user experience of cavs in a simulator environment. In Advances in Human Factors of Transportation: Proceedings of the AHFE 2019 International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation, July 24-28, 2019, Washington DC, USA 10, pages 120–132. Springer, 2020.
  42. Creating appropriate trust in automated vehicle systems: A framework for hmi design. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 48(1):95–101, 2017.
  43. In the passenger seat: investigating ride comfort measures in autonomous cars. IEEE Intelligent transportation systems magazine, 7(3):4–17, 2015.
  44. Pedestrian assessment: Is displaying automated driving mode in self-driving vehicles as relevant as emitting an engine sound in electric vehicles? Applied ergonomics, 94:103425, 2021.
  45. External hmi for self-driving vehicles: Which information shall be displayed? Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 68:171–186, 2020.
  46. Nle-dm: Natural-language explanations for decision making of autonomous driving based on semantic scene understanding. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2023.
  47. Incorporating situation awareness cues in virtual reality for users in dynamic in-vehicle environments. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 28(11):3865–3873, 2022.
  48. Resurrecting the ghost in the shell: A need-centered development approach for optimizing user experience in highly automated vehicles. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 65:439–456, 2019.
  49. Is too much system caution counterproductive? effects of varying sensitivity and automation levels in vehicle collision avoidance systems. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–13, 2020.
  50. Explainable autonomy: A study of explanation styles for building clear mental models. In 11th International Conference of Natural Language Generation 2018, pages 99–108. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2018.
  51. Explanation to avert surprise. In IUI Workshops, volume 2068, 2018.
  52. Trusting explainable autonomous driving: Simulated studies. In 2022 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pages 1255–1260. IEEE, 2022.
  53. Human centered explainability for intelligent vehicles–a user study. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pages 297–306, 2022.
  54. A human-centric method for generating causal explanations in natural language for autonomous vehicle motion planning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.08783, 2022.
  55. Balint Gyevnar. Cars that explain: Building trust in autonomous vehicles through explanations and conversations. Retrieved April, 12:2023, 2022.
  56. Effects of explanation types and perceived risk on trust in autonomous vehicles. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 73:271–280, 2020.
  57. Communicating intent of automated vehicles to pedestrians. Frontiers in psychology, 9:1336, 2018.
  58. Evaluation of common external communication concepts of automated vehicles for people with intellectual disabilities. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 6(MHCI):1–19, 2022.
  59. The first impression counts–a combined driving simulator and test track study on the development of trust and acceptance of highly automated driving. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 65:522–535, 2019.
  60. Improving passenger experience and trust in automated vehicles through user-adaptive hmis:“the more the better” does not apply to everyone. Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 3:669030, 2021.
  61. Explanations and expectations: Trust building in automated vehicles. In Companion of the 2018 ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction, pages 119–120, 2018.
  62. How users of automated vehicles benefit from predictive ambient light displays. Applied ergonomics, 103:103762, 2022.
  63. In automatic we trust: investigating the impact of trust, control, personality characteristics, and extrinsic and intrinsic motivations on the acceptance of autonomous vehicles. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 35(19):1769–1780, 2019.
  64. Presenting system uncertainty in automotive uis for supporting trust calibration in autonomous driving. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications, pages 210–217, 2013.
  65. Trust in automation: Integrating empirical evidence on factors that influence trust. Human factors, 57(3):407–434, 2015.
  66. Metrics for explainable ai: Challenges and prospects. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.04608, 2018.
  67. Overtrust in external cues of automated vehicles: an experimental investigation. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications, pages 211–221, 2019.
  68. A taxonomy of vulnerable road users for hci based on a systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, pages 1–13, 2021.
  69. Relating consumers’ information and willingness to buy electric vehicles: Does personality matter? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 100:103049, 2021.
  70. ISO/TR23049. Road vehicles: Ergonomic aspects of external visual communication from automated vehicles to other road users. standard. international organization for standardization. 2018.
  71. J3134/201905. Automated Driving System (ADS) Marker Lamp - SAE International — sae.org, 2019. [Accessed 13-03-2024].
  72. Autonomous driving systems and experiences: A comprehensive survey. Autonomous and Connected Heavy Vehicle Technology, pages 65–80, 2022.
  73. A design space for human sensor and actuator focused in-vehicle interaction based on a systematic literature review. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 6(2):1–51, 2022.
  74. A study of public acceptance of autonomous cars. Worcester Polytechnic Institute: Worcester, MA, USA, page 156, 2013.
  75. Pedestrian trust in automated vehicles: Role of traffic signal and av driving behavior. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 6:117, 2019.
  76. Inaction: Interpretable action decision making for autonomous driving. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 370–387. Springer, 2022.
  77. Displaying vehicle driving mode–effects on pedestrian behavior and perceived safety. In Human Systems Engineering and Design II: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Human Systems Engineering and Design (IHSED2019): Future Trends and Applications, September 16-18, 2019, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Munich, Germany, pages 250–256. Springer, 2020.
  78. A priori acceptance of highly automated cars in australia, france, and sweden: A theoretically-informed investigation guided by the tpb and utaut. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 137:105441, 2020.
  79. Ryan Othniel Kearns. Contextual trust. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08900, 2023.
  80. Augmented reality for vehicle-driver communication: a systematic review. Safety, 8(4):84, 2022.
  81. Autonomous vehicles for all? Journal on Autonomous Transportation Systems, 2023.
  82. Textual explanations for self-driving vehicles. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), pages 563–578, 2018.
  83. Explainable action prediction through self-supervision on scene graphs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.03477, 2023.
  84. Explainable ai in scene understanding for autonomous vehicles in unstructured traffic environments on indian roads using the inception u-net model with grad-cam visualization. Sensors, 22(24):9677, 2022.
  85. Why did my car just do that? explaining semi-autonomous driving actions to improve driver understanding, trust, and performance. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 9:269–275, 2015.
  86. Philip Koopman. Practical experience report: Automotive safety practices vs. accepted principles. In Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security: 37th International Conference, SAFECOMP 2018, Västerås, Sweden, September 19-21, 2018, Proceedings 37, pages 3–11. Springer, 2018.
  87. Explainable ai for cultural minds. In Workshop on Dialogue, Explanation and Argumentation for Human-Agent Interaction, 2020.
  88. Potential individual differences regarding automation effects in automated driving. In Proceedings of the XV international conference on human computer interaction, pages 1–7, 2014.
  89. Introduction matters: Manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving. Applied ergonomics, 66:18–31, 2018.
  90. The more you know: trust dynamics and calibration in highly automated driving and the effects of take-overs, system malfunction, and system transparency. Human factors, 62(5):718–736, 2020.
  91. Autonomous vehicles: Data protection and ethical considerations. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM Computer Science in Cars Symposium, pages 1–10, 2020.
  92. Feeling uncertain—effects of a vibrotactile belt that communicates vehicle sensor uncertainty. Information, 11(7):353, 2020.
  93. Textual explanations for automated commentary driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08178, 2023.
  94. Augmented reality displays for communicating uncertainty information in automated driving. In Proceedings of the 10th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications, pages 164–175, 2018.
  95. Automation transparency: implications of uncertainty communication for human-automation interaction and interfaces. Ergonomics, 62(3):345–360, 2019.
  96. Conveying uncertainties using peripheral awareness displays in the context of automated driving. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pages 329–341, 2019.
  97. Function-specific uncertainty communication in automated driving. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction (IJMHCI), 11(2):75–97, 2019.
  98. Explainable ai for safe and trustworthy autonomous driving: A systematic review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.10086, 2024.
  99. Interaction effects of pedestrian behavior, smartphone distraction and external communication of automated vehicles on crossing and gaze behavior. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–18, 2023.
  100. Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human factors, 46(1):50–80, 2004.
  101. Age differences in acceptance of self-driving cars: A survey of perceptions and attitudes. In Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Aging, Design and User Experience: Third International Conference, ITAP 2017, Held as Part of HCI International 2017, Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 9-14, 2017, Proceedings, Part I 3, pages 3–13. Springer, 2017.
  102. Joint interaction and trajectory prediction for autonomous driving using graph neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.07882, 2019.
  103. Investigating effects of multimodal explanations using multiple in-vehicle displays for takeover request in conditionally automated driving. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 96:1–22, 2023.
  104. Continual learning for robotics: Definition, framework, learning strategies, opportunities and challenges. Information fusion, 58:52–68, 2020.
  105. Study on subjective and objective safety and application of expressway. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 96:1622–1630, 2013.
  106. To cross or not to cross: Urgency-based external warning displays on autonomous vehicles to improve pedestrian crossing safety. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pages 188–197, 2018.
  107. A spontaneous driver emotion facial expression (defe) dataset for intelligent vehicles: Emotions triggered by video-audio clips in driving scenarios. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 2021.
  108. Hazel Si Min Lim and Araz Taeihagh. Algorithmic decision-making in avs: Understanding ethical and technical concerns for smart cities. Sustainability, 11(20):5791, 2019.
  109. Towards explainable motion prediction using heterogeneous graph representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.03806, 2022.
  110. The effect of population age on the acceptable safety of self-driving vehicles. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 185:341–347, 2019.
  111. Computing systems for autonomous driving: State of the art and challenges. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(8):6469–6486, 2020.
  112. A literature review on additional semantic information conveyed from driving automation systems to drivers through advanced in-vehicle hmi just before, during, and right after takeover request. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(10):1995–2015, 2023.
  113. Accessible automated automotive workshop series (a3ws): International perspective on inclusive external human-machine interfaces. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pages 192–195, 2022.
  114. Explaining deep learning-based driver models. Applied Sciences, 11(8):3321, 2021.
  115. A survey of human action recognition and posture prediction. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 27(6):973–1001, 2022.
  116. Roadscene2vec: A tool for extracting and embedding road scene-graphs. Knowledge-Based Systems, 242:108245, 2022.
  117. Od-xai: Explainable ai-based semantic object detection for autonomous vehicles. Applied Sciences, 12(11):5310, 2022.
  118. Explainable sparse attention for memory-based trajectory predictors. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 543–560. Springer, 2022.
  119. Exploring the effects of meaningful tactile display on perception and preference in automated vehicles. Transportation Research Board, 2022.
  120. Wolfgang Messner. Improving the cross-cultural functioning of deep artificial neural networks through machine enculturation. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 2(2):100118, 2022.
  121. Building proactive voice assistants: When and how (not) to interact. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.01322, 2020.
  122. Adam Millard-Ball. Pedestrians, autonomous vehicles, and cities. Journal of planning education and research, 38(1):6–12, 2018.
  123. Tim Miller. Explanation in artificial intelligence: Insights from the social sciences. Artificial intelligence, 267:1–38, 2019.
  124. Towards explainable artificial intelligence (xai) for early anticipation of traffic accidents. arXiv e-prints, pages arXiv–2108, 2021.
  125. Indicating the limits of partially automated vehicles with drivers’ peripheral vision: an online study. In International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, pages 78–85. Springer, 2021.
  126. Building trust in autonomous vehicles: Role of virtual reality driving simulators in hmi design. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 68(10):9438–9450, 2019.
  127. Intelligent in-vehicle interaction technologies. Advanced Intelligent Systems, 4(2):2100122, 2022.
  128. Assessing and explaining collision risk in dynamic environments for autonomous driving safety. In 2021 IEEE International Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC), pages 223–230. IEEE, 2021.
  129. Explainability in ai policies: A critical review of communications, reports, regulations, and standards in the eu, us, and uk. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pages 1198–1212, 2023.
  130. What drives the acceptance of autonomous driving? an investigation of acceptance factors from an end-user’s perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 161:120319, 2020.
  131. From partial and high automation to manual driving: Relationship between non-driving related tasks, drowsiness and take-over performance. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 121:28–42, 2018.
  132. Towards guidelines and verification methods for automated vehicle hmis. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 60:121–136, 2019.
  133. Designing for projection-based communication between autonomous vehicles and pedestrians. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications, pages 284–294, 2019.
  134. Design for perception-a systematic approach for the design of driving automation systems based on the users’ perception. In Adjunct Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pages 87–90, 2022.
  135. Towards accountability: providing intelligible explanations in autonomous driving. In 2021 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pages 231–237. IEEE, 2021.
  136. Explanations in autonomous driving: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(8):10142–10162, 2021.
  137. From spoken thoughts to automated driving commentary: Predicting and explaining intelligent vehicles’ actions. In 2022 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pages 1040–1047. IEEE, 2022.
  138. Effects of explanation specificity on passengers in autonomous driving. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.00633, 2023.
  139. Safety assessment of the interaction between an automated vehicle and a cyclist: a controlled field test. Transportation research record, 2677(2):1138–1149, 2023.
  140. A framework for designing interactions between pedestrians and driverless cars: insights from a ride-sharing design study. In Proceedings of the 30th Australian conference on computer-human interaction, pages 359–363, 2018.
  141. Black is the new orange: how to determine ai liability. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 31(1):133–167, 2023.
  142. Humans vs, machines; motorcyclists and car drivers differ in their opinion and trust of self-drive vehicles. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 92:143–154, 2023.
  143. Towards better performance and more explainable uncertainty for 3d object detection of autonomous vehicles. In 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pages 1–7. IEEE, 2020.
  144. An empirical investigation on consumers’ intentions towards autonomous driving. Transportation research part C: emerging technologies, 95:773–784, 2018.
  145. Transport safety and human factors in the era of automation: What can transport modes learn from each other? Accident analysis & prevention, 144:105656, 2020.
  146. Robotics at the crossroads: A discussion of ethical considerations, moral implications, and inclusive design. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, volume 67, pages 519–522. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 2023.
  147. Impact of training and in-vehicle task performance on manual control recovery in an automated car. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 46:216–227, 2017.
  148. Anantha Pillai. Virtual reality based study to analyse pedestrian attitude towards autonomous vehicles. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 2017.
  149. Principles of transparency for autonomous vehicles: first results of an experiment with an augmented reality human–machine interface. Cognition, Technology & Work, 21:643–656, 2019.
  150. Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess public receptivity toward autonomous vehicles and its relation with the traffic safety climate in china. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 128:78–86, 2019.
  151. The effects of trait anxiety and the big five personality traits on self-driving car acceptance. Transportation, 48:2663–2679, 2021.
  152. Rudi Rankin. LINGO-1: Exploring Natural Language for Autonomous Driving — wayve.ai. https://wayve.ai/thinking/lingo-natural-language-autonomous-driving/, 2023. [Accessed 21-12-2023].
  153. Explaining radar features for detecting spoofing attacks in connected autonomous vehicles. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.00150, 2022.
  154. A survey of autonomous driving scenarios and scenario databases. In 2022 9th International Conference on Dependable Systems and Their Applications (DSA), pages 754–762. IEEE, 2022.
  155. Plant: Explainable planning transformers via object-level representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.14222, 2022.
  156. Augmented reality windshield displays and their potential to enhance user experience in automated driving. i-com, 18(2):127–149, 2019.
  157. Ghost on the windshield: Employing a virtual human character to communicate pedestrian acknowledgement and vehicle intention. Information, 13(9):420, 2022.
  158. Looking for age differences in self-driving vehicles: examining the effects of automation reliability, driving risk, and physical impairment on trust. Frontiers in Psychology, 10:800, 2019.
  159. Enhancing trust in autonomous vehicles through intelligent user interfaces that mimic human behavior. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 2(4):62, 2018.
  160. SAE. Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to driving automation systems for on-road motor vehicles. SAE Int., 4970(724):1–5, 2018.
  161. Improving semantic segmentation under hazy weather for autonomous vehicles using explainable artificial intelligence and adaptive dehazing approach. IEEE Access, 11:38194–38207, 2023.
  162. Increasing the user experience in autonomous driving through different feedback modalities. In 26th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pages 7–10, 2021.
  163. Explain yourself! transparency for positive ux in autonomous driving. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1–12, 2021.
  164. Don’t fail me! the level 5 autonomous driving information dilemma regarding transparency and user experience. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pages 540–552, 2023.
  165. Autonomous mobilities and social meanings: The case of new zealand. In T2M 2021 Conference – Mobilities In Transition: Circulation, Appropriation, Globalization, 2021.
  166. To explain or not to explain: A study on the necessity of explanations for autonomous vehicles. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.11684, 2020.
  167. Using human–machine interfaces to convey feedback in automated driving. Journal of cognitive engineering and decision making, 16(1):29–42, 2022.
  168. Displaying the driving state of automated vehicles to other road users: An international, virtual reality-based study as a first step for the harmonized regulations of novel signaling devices. IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, 23(4):2904–2918, 2020.
  169. Head-up vs. head-down displays: examining traditional methods of display assessment while driving. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pages 185–192, 2016.
  170. Thirdeye: Attention maps for safe autonomous driving systems. In Proceedings of the 37th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, pages 1–12, 2022.
  171. Commonsense visual sensemaking for autonomous driving–on generalised neurosymbolic online abduction integrating vision and semantics. Artificial Intelligence, 299:103522, 2021.
  172. A survey on cyber-security of connected and autonomous vehicles (cavs). IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(7):6240–6259, 2021.
  173. Modeling and analysis of human-machine mixed traffic flow considering the influence of the trust level toward autonomous vehicles. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 125:102741, 2023.
  174. Techspot. Mercedes-Benz debuts turquoise exterior lights to indicate the car is self-driving— techspot.com. https://shorturl.at/jmvF6, 2023. [Accessed 05-02-2024].
  175. UKRI. Framework for responsible research and innovation — ukri.org. https://shorturl.at/gnwNX, 2023. [Accessed 20-12-2023].
  176. Studying pedestrians’ crossing behavior when interacting with automated vehicles using virtual reality. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 66:1–14, 2019.
  177. Pedestrians and visual signs of intent: towards expressive autonomous passenger shuttles. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, 3(3):1–31, 2019.
  178. Explainable artificial intelligence: a systematic review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.00093, 2020.
  179. “watch out!”: Prediction-level intervention for automated driving. In 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pages 169–180, 2020.
  180. Waymo. Waypoint - The official Waymo blog: Driven by Waymo, Designed with Trust — waymo.com. https://waymo.com/blog/2019/09/driven-by-waymo-designed-with-trust.html, 2023. [Accessed 21-12-2023].
  181. The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of experimental social psychology, 52:113–117, 2014.
  182. “i’d like an explanation for that!” exploring reactions to unexpected autonomous driving. In 22nd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, pages 1–11, 2020.
  183. Reflecting the automated vehicle’s perception and intention: Light-based interaction approaches for on-board hmi in highly automated vehicles. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces Companion, pages 105–107, 2020.
  184. Ieee standard for transparency of autonomous systems. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 2022.
  185. Explainable automation: Personalized and adaptive uis to foster trust and understanding of driving automation systems. In 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, pages 252–261, 2020.
  186. Autonomous vehicles: Vehicle parameter estimation using variational bayes and kinematics. Applied Sciences, 10(18):6317, 2020.
  187. Toward human-vehicle collaboration: Review and perspectives on human-centered collaborative automated driving. Transportation research part C: emerging technologies, 128:103199, 2021.
  188. Scene-graph augmented data-driven risk assessment of autonomous vehicle decisions. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(7):7941–7951, 2021.
  189. A survey of autonomous driving: Common practices and emerging technologies. IEEE access, 8:58443–58469, 2020.
  190. Explainability of deep vision-based autonomous driving systems: Review and challenges. International Journal of Computer Vision, 130(10):2425–2452, 2022.
  191. The effects of transparency and reliability of in-vehicle intelligent agents on driver perception, takeover performance, workload and situation awareness in conditionally automated vehicles. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 6(9):82, 2022.
  192. Drivers’ age and automated vehicle explanations. Sustainability, 13(4):1948, 2021.
  193. Trajectory prediction for autonomous driving using spatial-temporal graph attention transformer. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(11):22343–22353, 2022.
  194. Tactical-level explanation is not enough: Effect of explaining av’s lane-changing decisions on drivers’ decision-making, trust, and emotional experience. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(7):1438–1454, 2023.
  195. Keeping in the lane! investigating drivers’ performance handling silent vs. alerted lateral control failures in monotonous partially automated driving. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 95:103429, 2023.
  196. Communication between autonomous vehicles and pedestrians: an experimental study using virtual reality. Sensors, 23(3):1049, 2023.
  197. Factors affecting pedestrians’ trust in automated vehicles: Literature review and theoretical model. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, 52(3):490–500, 2021.
  198. Examining pedestrians’ trust in automated vehicles based on attributes of trust: A qualitative study. Applied Ergonomics, 109:103997, 2023.
  199. Amused, accepted, and used? attitudes and emotions towards automated vehicles, their relationships, and predictive value for usage intention. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 65:68–78, 2019.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Sule Tekkesinoglu (2 papers)
  2. Azra Habibovic (1 paper)
  3. Lars Kunze (40 papers)
Citations (1)
View on Semantic Scholar
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets