Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
169 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

TDANet: A Novel Temporal Denoise Convolutional Neural Network With Attention for Fault Diagnosis (2403.19943v1)

Published 29 Mar 2024 in cs.LG, cs.AI, and eess.SP

Abstract: Fault diagnosis plays a crucial role in maintaining the operational integrity of mechanical systems, preventing significant losses due to unexpected failures. As intelligent manufacturing and data-driven approaches evolve, Deep Learning (DL) has emerged as a pivotal technique in fault diagnosis research, recognized for its ability to autonomously extract complex features. However, the practical application of current fault diagnosis methods is challenged by the complexity of industrial environments. This paper proposed the Temporal Denoise Convolutional Neural Network With Attention (TDANet), designed to improve fault diagnosis performance in noise environments. This model transforms one-dimensional signals into two-dimensional tensors based on their periodic properties, employing multi-scale 2D convolution kernels to extract signal information both within and across periods. This method enables effective identification of signal characteristics that vary over multiple time scales. The TDANet incorporates a Temporal Variable Denoise (TVD) module with residual connections and a Multi-head Attention Fusion (MAF) module, enhancing the saliency of information within noisy data and maintaining effective fault diagnosis performance. Evaluation on two datasets, CWRU (single sensor) and Real aircraft sensor fault (multiple sensors), demonstrates that the TDANet model significantly outperforms existing deep learning approaches in terms of diagnostic accuracy under noisy environments.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (25)
  1. B. Yang, Y. Lei, F. Jia, N. Li, and Z. Du, “A polynomial kernel induced distance metric to improve deep transfer learning for fault diagnosis of machines,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 67, no. 11, pp. 9747–9757, 2019.
  2. Z. He, H. Shao, Z. Ding, H. Jiang, and J. Cheng, “Modified deep autoencoder driven by multisource parameters for fault transfer prognosis of aeroengine,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 845–855, 2021.
  3. J. Chen, W. Hu, G. Zhang, J. Hu, Q. Huang, Z. Chen, and F. Blaabjerg, “A novel knowledge sharing method for rolling bearing fault detection against impact of different signal sampling frequencies,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2023.
  4. J. Chen, W. Hu, D. Cao, M. Zhang, Q. Huang, Z. Chen, and F. Blaabjerg, “Gaussian process kernel transfer enabled method for electric machines intelligent faults detection with limited samples,” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 3481–3490, 2021.
  5. A. K. Jalan and A. Mohanty, “Model based fault diagnosis of a rotor–bearing system for misalignment and unbalance under steady-state condition,” Journal of sound and vibration, vol. 327, no. 3-5, pp. 604–622, 2009.
  6. J. Dybała and R. Zimroz, “Rolling bearing diagnosing method based on empirical mode decomposition of machine vibration signal,” Applied Acoustics, vol. 77, pp. 195–203, 2014.
  7. S. Zhang, S. Zhang, B. Wang, and T. G. Habetler, “Deep learning algorithms for bearing fault diagnostics-a comprehensive review,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 29 857–29 881, 2020.
  8. J. Zarei, “Induction motors bearing fault detection using pattern recognition techniques,” Expert systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 68–73, 2012.
  9. S. Qian, X. Yang, J. Huang, and H. Zhang, “Application of new training method combined with feedforward artificial neural network for rolling bearing fault diagnosis,” in 2016 23rd International Conference on Mechatronics and Machine Vision in Practice (M2VIP), pp. 1–6.   IEEE, 2016.
  10. M. Xia, F. Kong, and F. Hu, “An approach for bearing fault diagnosis based on pca and multiple classifier fusion,” in 2011 6th IEEE Joint International Information Technology and Artificial Intelligence Conference, vol. 1, DOI 10.1109/ITAIC.2011.6030215, pp. 321–325, 2011.
  11. X. Xue and J. Zhou, “A hybrid fault diagnosis approach based on mixed-domain state features for rotating machinery,” ISA transactions, vol. 66, pp. 284–295, 2017.
  12. M. Miao, Y. Sun, and J. Yu, “Sparse representation convolutional autoencoder for feature learning of vibration signals and its applications in machinery fault diagnosis,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 69, no. 12, pp. 13 565–13 575, 2021.
  13. O. Janssens, V. Slavkovikj, B. Vervisch, K. Stockman, M. Loccufier, S. Verstockt, R. Van de Walle, and S. Van Hoecke, “Convolutional neural network based fault detection for rotating machinery,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 377, pp. 331–345, 2016.
  14. Y. Xu, Z. Li, S. Wang, W. Li, T. Sarkodie-Gyan, and S. Feng, “A hybrid deep-learning model for fault diagnosis of rolling bearings,” Measurement, vol. 169, p. 108502, 2021.
  15. W. Mao, W. Feng, Y. Liu, D. Zhang, and X. Liang, “A new deep auto-encoder method with fusing discriminant information for bearing fault diagnosis,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 150, p. 107233, 2021.
  16. S. Ma and F. Chu, “Ensemble deep learning-based fault diagnosis of rotor bearing systems,” Computers in industry, vol. 105, pp. 143–152, 2019.
  17. X. Chen, B. Zhang, and D. Gao, “Bearing fault diagnosis base on multi-scale cnn and lstm model,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 971–987, 2021.
  18. W. Zhang, X. Li, and Q. Ding, “Deep residual learning-based fault diagnosis method for rotating machinery,” ISA transactions, vol. 95, pp. 295–305, 2019.
  19. P. Liang, W. Wang, X. Yuan, S. Liu, L. Zhang, and Y. Cheng, “Intelligent fault diagnosis of rolling bearing based on wavelet transform and improved resnet under noisy labels and environment,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 115, p. 105269, 2022.
  20. Y. Guo, J. Mao, and M. Zhao, “Rolling bearing fault diagnosis method based on attention cnn and bilstm network,” Neural processing letters, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 3377–3410, 2023.
  21. J. Zhao, S. Yang, Q. Li, Y. Liu, X. Gu, and W. Liu, “A new bearing fault diagnosis method based on signal-to-image mapping and convolutional neural network,” Measurement, vol. 176, p. 109088, 2021.
  22. M. Sandsten, “Time-frequency analysis of time-varying signals and non-stationary processes,” Lund University, 2016.
  23. J. Hendriks, P. Dumond, and D. Knox, “Towards better benchmarking using the cwru bearing fault dataset,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 169, p. 108732, 2022.
  24. Z. Li, Y. Zhang, J. Ai, Y. Zhao, Y. Yu, and Y. Dong, “A lightweight and explainable data-driven scheme for fault detection of aerospace sensors,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 2023.
  25. H. Liu, R. Ma, D. Li, L. Yan, and Z. Ma, “Machinery fault diagnosis based on deep learning for time series analysis and knowledge graphs,” journal of signal processing systems, vol. 93, pp. 1433–1455, 2021.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.