Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
143 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Expectation Maximization Aided Modified Weighted Sequential Energy Detector for Distributed Cooperative Spectrum Sensing (2403.19556v2)

Published 28 Mar 2024 in eess.SY and cs.SY

Abstract: Energy detector (ED) is a popular choice for distributed cooperative spectrum sensing because it does not need to be cognizant of the primary user (PU) signal characteristics. However, the conventional ED-based sensing usually requires large number of observed samples per energy statistic, particularly at low signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), for improved detection capability. This is due to the fact that it uses the energy only from the present sensing interval for the PU detection. Previous studies have shown that even with fewer observed samples per energy statistics, improved detection capabilities can be achieved by aggregating both present and past ED samples in a test statistic. Thus, a weighted sequential energy detector (WSED) has been proposed, but it is based on aggregating all the collected ED samples over an observation window. For a highly dynamic PU over the consecutive sensing intervals, that involves also combining the outdated samples in the test statistic that do not correspond to the present state of the PU. In this paper, we propose a modified WSED (mWSED) that uses the primary user states information over the window to aggregate only the highly correlated ED samples in its test statistic. In practice, since the PU states are a priori unknown, we also develop a joint expectation-maximization and Viterbi (EM-Viterbi) algorithm based scheme to iteratively estimate the states by using the ED samples collected over the window. The estimated states are then used in mWSED to compute its test statistics, and the algorithm is referred to here as the EM-mWSED algorithm. Simulation results show that EM-mWSED outperforms other schemes and its performance improves by increasing the average number of neighbors per SU in the network, and by increasing the SNR or the number of samples per energy statistic.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (23)
  1. S. Haykin, “Cognitive radio: brain-empowered wireless communications,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 201–220, 2005.
  2. T. Yucek and H. Arslan, “A survey of spectrum sensing algorithms for cognitive radio applications,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 116–130, 2009.
  3. E. Axell, G. Leus, E. G. Larsson, and H. V. Poor, “Spectrum Sensing for Cognitive Radio : State-of-the-Art and Recent Advances,” IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 101–116, 2012.
  4. A. Ghasemi and E. Sousa, “Collaborative spectrum sensing for opportunistic access in fading environments,” in First IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, 2005. DySPAN 2005., 2005, pp. 131–136.
  5. K. Cichoń, A. Kliks, and H. Bogucka, “Energy-Efficient Cooperative Spectrum Sensing: A Survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1861–1886, 2016.
  6. I. F. Akyildiz, B. F. Lo, and R. Balakrishnan, “Cooperative spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks: A survey,” Physical Communication, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 40–62, 2011.
  7. W. Prawatmuang and D. K. C. So, “Adaptive sequential cooperative spectrum sensing technique in time varying channel,” in 2012 IEEE 23rd International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications - (PIMRC), 2012, pp. 1546–1551.
  8. W. Prawatmuang, D. K. C. So, and E. Alsusa, “Sequential Cooperative Spectrum Sensing Technique in Time Varying Channel,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 3394–3405, 2014.
  9. Z. Li, F. R. Yu, and M. Huang, “A Distributed Consensus-Based Cooperative Spectrum-Sensing Scheme in Cognitive Radios,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 383–393, 2010.
  10. A. Mustafa, M. N. U. Islam, and S. Ahmed, “Dynamic Spectrum Sensing Under Crash and Byzantine Failure Environments for Distributed Convergence in Cognitive Radio Networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 23 153–23 167, 2021.
  11. A. Gharib, W. Ejaz, and M. Ibnkahla, “Enhanced Multiband Multiuser Cooperative Spectrum Sensing for Distributed CRNs,” IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 256–270, 2020.
  12. R. Olfati-Saber, J. A. Fax, and R. M. Murray, “Consensus and Cooperation in Networked Multi-Agent Systems,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 215–233, 2007.
  13. S. Boyd, P. Diaconis, and L. Xiao, “Fastest Mixing Markov Chain on a Graph,” SIAM Review, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 667–689, 2004.
  14. H. Wang, W. Xu, and J. Lu, “Privacy-Preserving Push-sum Average Consensus Algorithm over Directed Graph Via State Decomposition,” in 2021 3rd International Conference on Industrial Artificial Intelligence (IAI), 2021, pp. 1–6.
  15. X. Qiao, Y. Wu, and D. Meng, “Privacy-Preserving Average Consensus for Multi-agent Systems with Directed Topologies,” in 2021 8th International Conference on Information, Cybernetics, and Computational Social Systems (ICCSS), 2021, pp. 7–12.
  16. Q. Yan, M. Li, T. Jiang, W. Lou, and Y. T. Hou, “Vulnerability and protection for distributed consensus-based spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks,” in 2012 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM, 2012, pp. 900–908.
  17. B. Kailkhura, S. Brahma, and P. K. Varshney, “Data Falsification Attacks on Consensus-Based Detection Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 145–158, 2017.
  18. G. Forney, “The viterbi algorithm,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 268–278, 1973.
  19. A. P. Dempster, N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin, “Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1–38, 1977.
  20. L. E. Baum, T. Petrie, G. Soules, and N. Weiss, “A Maximization Technique Occurring in the Statistical Analysis of Probabilistic Functions of Markov Chains,” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 164–171, 1970.
  21. M. Rashid and M. Naraghi-Pour, “Multitarget Joint Delay and Doppler-Shift Estimation in Bistatic Passive Radar,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 1795–1806, 2020.
  22. M. Rashid and J. A. Nanzer, “Online Expectation-Maximization Based Frequency and Phase Consensus in Distributed Phased Arrays,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, pp. 1–1, 2023.
  23. R. A. Rashid, Y. S. Baguda, N. Fisal, M. Adib Sarijari, S. K. S. Yusof, S. H. S. Ariffin, N. M. A. Latiff, and A. Mohd, “Optimizing distributed cooperative sensing performance using swarm intelligence,” in Informatics Engineering and Information Science.   Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011, pp. 407–420.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now