Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

TextCraftor: Your Text Encoder Can be Image Quality Controller (2403.18978v1)

Published 27 Mar 2024 in cs.CV, cs.AI, and cs.LG

Abstract: Diffusion-based text-to-image generative models, e.g., Stable Diffusion, have revolutionized the field of content generation, enabling significant advancements in areas like image editing and video synthesis. Despite their formidable capabilities, these models are not without their limitations. It is still challenging to synthesize an image that aligns well with the input text, and multiple runs with carefully crafted prompts are required to achieve satisfactory results. To mitigate these limitations, numerous studies have endeavored to fine-tune the pre-trained diffusion models, i.e., UNet, utilizing various technologies. Yet, amidst these efforts, a pivotal question of text-to-image diffusion model training has remained largely unexplored: Is it possible and feasible to fine-tune the text encoder to improve the performance of text-to-image diffusion models? Our findings reveal that, instead of replacing the CLIP text encoder used in Stable Diffusion with other LLMs, we can enhance it through our proposed fine-tuning approach, TextCraftor, leading to substantial improvements in quantitative benchmarks and human assessments. Interestingly, our technique also empowers controllable image generation through the interpolation of different text encoders fine-tuned with various rewards. We also demonstrate that TextCraftor is orthogonal to UNet finetuning, and can be combined to further improve generative quality.

TextCraftor: Enhancing Text-to-Image Diffusion Models via Text Encoder Fine-Tuning

The paper "TextCraftor: Your Text Encoder Can be Image Quality Controller" presents an innovative approach to enhancing the performance of text-to-image diffusion models by fine-tuning the text encoder. The authors explore the possibility of fine-tuning the pre-trained text encoder in diffusion models, instead of substituting it with other LLMs. This methodology is encapsulated in their proposed framework, TextCraftor, which aims to improve image quality and text-image alignment.

Framework and Techniques

The core contribution of this paper lies in the introduction of TextCraftor, a fine-tuning framework designed to optimize the text encoder without replacing it. The authors demonstrate that fine-tuning the existing CLIP text encoder, rather than substituting it with models like T5, can yield significant improvements in image generation quality. This process is supported by using various reward functions, such as aesthetic predictors and text-image alignment models, to guide the fine-tuning of the encoder. The reward functions are integrated in a differentiable manner, enabling efficient fine-tuning using only text prompts, thus avoiding the need for extensive text-image paired datasets.

The TextCraftor framework leverages an end-to-end training pipeline that combines these reward functions with a novel alignment constraint. This constraint helps maintain the capabilities of the pre-trained CLIP text encoder, ensuring the model remains generic and capable of handling a broad range of inputs. Notably, the proposed approach does not introduce additional computational or storage overhead, a critical consideration given the significant size of modern deep learning models.

Experimental Results

The experimental evaluation of TextCraftor demonstrates compelling enhancements over traditional models. On the Parti-Prompt and HPSv2 benchmark datasets, TextCraftor outperforms not only the baseline Stable Diffusion models (SDv1.5 and SDv2.0) but also larger models such as SDXL Base 0.9 and DeepFloyd-XL. Moreover, TextCraftor achieves better textual alignment and image quality scores, compared with methods utilizing automatic prompt engineering and reinforcement learning approaches like DDPO.

These improvements are quantified through automated metrics across various benchmarks as well as human assessments, highlighting the broader applicability and robustness of the technique. Furthermore, the paper illustrates that TextCraftor can complement existing UNet finetuning methodologies, suggesting potential avenues for combining enhancements to achieve even greater model performance.

Implications and Future Directions

TextCraftor's success in enhancing text-to-image diffusion models has both theoretical and practical implications. Theoretically, it shifts the focus from solely improving the UNet component to considering improvements at the text encoding stage, broadening the horizons for future research into model optimization and architecture design. Practically, the ability to fine-tune pre-existing models to achieve significant improvements suggests that similar techniques can be applied to other machine learning domains, potentially leading to more efficient deployment of high-performing models without additional computational burdens.

In future developments, as reward models continue to improve, there exists a potential to further enhance the quality of diffusion models by integrating even more sophisticated and nuanced reward functions. Additionally, the idea of interpolating between different fine-tuned versions of text encoders opens new prospects for controllable and diverse image generation, providing users with greater creative flexibility. These developments underscore the transformative potential of the TextCraftor framework in the evolving landscape of AI and machine learning.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (62)
  1. Clip+mlp aesthetic score predictor. https://github.com/christophschuhmann/improved-aesthetic-predictor#clipmlp-aesthetic-score-predictor, 2022.
  2. ediffi: Text-to-image diffusion models with an ensemble of expert denoisers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.01324, 2022.
  3. Training diffusion models with reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.13301, 2023.
  4. Muse: Text-to-image generation via masked generative transformers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.00704, 2023.
  5. Pixart-α𝛼\alphaitalic_α: Fast training of diffusion transformer for photorealistic text-to-image synthesis, 2023.
  6. Training deep nets with sublinear memory cost. arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.06174, 2016.
  7. Scaling instruction-finetuned language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.11416, 2022.
  8. Directly fine-tuning diffusion models on differentiable rewards. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.17400, 2023.
  9. Emu: Enhancing image generation models using photogenic needles in a haystack. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.15807, 2023.
  10. Diffusion models beat gans on image synthesis. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:8780–8794, 2021.
  11. Raft: Reward ranked finetuning for generative foundation model alignment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.06767, 2023.
  12. Dpok: Reinforcement learning for fine-tuning text-to-image diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.16381, 2023.
  13. A systematic survey of prompt engineering on vision-language foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.12980, 2023.
  14. Optimizing prompts for text-to-image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.09611, 2022.
  15. Scalecrafter: Tuning-free higher-resolution visual generation with diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.07702, 2023.
  16. Prompt-to-prompt image editing with cross attention control. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.01626, 2022.
  17. Classifier-free diffusion guidance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.12598, 2022.
  18. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:6840–6851, 2020.
  19. Imagen video: High definition video generation with diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02303, 2022.
  20. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.09685, 2021.
  21. Scaling up gans for text-to-image synthesis. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 10124–10134, 2023.
  22. Elucidating the design space of diffusion-based generative models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.00364, 2022.
  23. Auto-encoding variational bayes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114, 2013.
  24. Pick-a-pic: An open dataset of user preferences for text-to-image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.01569, 2023.
  25. Aligning text-to-image models using human feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.12192, 2023.
  26. Snapfusion: Text-to-image diffusion model on mobile devices within two seconds. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.00980, 2023.
  27. More control for free! image synthesis with semantic diffusion guidance. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pages 289–299, 2023a.
  28. Hyperhuman: Hyper-realistic human generation with latent structural diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.08579, 2023b.
  29. Decoupled weight decay regularization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101, 2017.
  30. Repaint: Inpainting using denoising diffusion probabilistic models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 11461–11471, 2022.
  31. Generating high fidelity images with subscale pixel networks and multidimensional upscaling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.01608, 2018.
  32. Glide: Towards photorealistic image generation and editing with text-guided diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.10741, 2021.
  33. Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32, pages 8024–8035. Curran Associates, Inc., 2019.
  34. Sdxl: Improving latent diffusion models for high-resolution image synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.01952, 2023.
  35. Aligning text-to-image diffusion models with reward backpropagation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.03739, 2023.
  36. Automatic prompt optimization with” gradient descent” and beam search. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.03495, 2023.
  37. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In International conference on machine learning, pages 8748–8763. PMLR, 2021.
  38. Zero-shot text-to-image generation. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 8821–8831. PMLR, 2021.
  39. Hierarchical text-conditional image generation with clip latents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.06125, 2022.
  40. Stochastic backpropagation and approximate inference in deep generative models. In International conference on machine learning, pages 1278–1286. PMLR, 2014.
  41. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 10684–10695, 2022.
  42. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In MICAI, 2015.
  43. Palette: Image-to-image diffusion models. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2022 Conference Proceedings, pages 1–10, 2022a.
  44. Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep language understanding. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:36479–36494, 2022b.
  45. Image super-resolution via iterative refinement. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2022c.
  46. Laion-5b: An open large-scale dataset for training next generation image-text models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.08402, 2022.
  47. Freeu: Free lunch in diffusion u-net. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.11497, 2023.
  48. Make-a-video: Text-to-video generation without text-video data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14792, 2022.
  49. Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 2256–2265. PMLR, 2015.
  50. Denoising diffusion implicit models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02502, 2020a.
  51. Generative modeling by estimating gradients of the data distribution. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019.
  52. Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.13456, 2020b.
  53. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971, 2023.
  54. Investigating prompt engineering in diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.15462, 2022.
  55. Human preference score v2: A solid benchmark for evaluating human preferences of text-to-image synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.09341, 2023a.
  56. Human preference score: Better aligning text-to-image models with human preference. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 2096–2105, 2023b.
  57. Imagereward: Learning and evaluating human preferences for text-to-image generation, 2023.
  58. Raphael: Text-to-image generation via large mixture of diffusion paths. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.18295, 2023.
  59. Scaling autoregressive models for content-rich text-to-image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.10789, 2022.
  60. Adding conditional control to text-to-image diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 3836–3847, 2023a.
  61. Sine: Single image editing with text-to-image diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 6027–6037, 2023b.
  62. Sur-adapter: Enhancing text-to-image pre-trained diffusion models with large language models. In Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 567–578, 2023.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (9)
  1. Yanyu Li (31 papers)
  2. Xian Liu (37 papers)
  3. Anil Kag (16 papers)
  4. Ju Hu (9 papers)
  5. Yerlan Idelbayev (9 papers)
  6. Dhritiman Sagar (2 papers)
  7. Yanzhi Wang (197 papers)
  8. Sergey Tulyakov (108 papers)
  9. Jian Ren (97 papers)
Citations (9)
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com