Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

XMoE: Sparse Models with Fine-grained and Adaptive Expert Selection (2403.18926v2)

Published 27 Feb 2024 in cs.LG and cs.CL

Abstract: Sparse models, including sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models, have emerged as an effective approach for scaling Transformer models. However, they often suffer from computational inefficiency since a significant number of parameters are unnecessarily involved in computations via multiplying values by zero or low activation values. To address this issue, we present \tool, a novel MoE designed to enhance both the efficacy and efficiency of sparse MoE models. \tool leverages small experts and a threshold-based router to enable tokens to selectively engage only essential parameters. Our extensive experiments on LLMing and machine translation tasks demonstrate that \tool can enhance model performance while decreasing the computation load at MoE layers by over 50\% without sacrificing performance. Furthermore, we present the versatility of \tool by applying it to dense models, enabling sparse computation during inference. We provide a comprehensive analysis and make our code available at https://github.com/ysngki/XMoE.

Enhancing Efficiency in Sparse Models with Sparser Selection

Introduction to XMoE

Sparse Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models have been identified as a promising avenue for scaling Transformer models without proportionally increasing computational costs. A critical issue with existing MoE implementations, however, is the under-utilization of parameters, resulting from substantial computations involving zero or negligibly small values. Addressing this inefficiency, the paper introduces the novel MoE design, XMoE, which employs smaller experts and a threshold-based router, demarcating a significant stride towards computational efficiency and efficacy in MoE models.

Key Contributions

The proposed methodology consists of the following primary elements:

  • Small Experts Utilization: By embracing small experts, XMoE permits a more granular parameter selection process. This adaptability ensures that only the most relevant parameters are engaged during computations, thereby enhancing the model's efficiency.
  • Adaptive Threshold-based Router: Unlike the static, top-kk selection routine, XMoE's adaptive router dynamically determines the number of experts each token should engage with. This methodology stands on the premise that tokens vary in the complexity they introduce, necessitating a flexible approach to expert allocation.
  • Performance Demonstration: Through extensive evaluation on LLMing and machine translation tasks, XMoE showcases the potential to significantly reduce computational overhead (by over 50% in MoE layers) without compromising on model performance. Additionally, the approach's versatility is highlighted by its applicability to dense models for inference-time computational savings.
  • Analytical Insights: The paper further explores a comprehensive analysis, highlighting operative insights into the computational inefficiencies extant in sparse MoE models and delineating the pathways through which XMoE addresses these inefficiencies.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

  1. On Theoretical Grounds: The paper's findings elucidate the computational redundancy prevalent in MoE models, challenging the prevalent notion that larger models with a greater number of parameters directly correlate with enhanced performance.
  2. In Practical Realms: XMoE not only establishes a method for significantly reducing computational costs but also sets a precedent for further research into the development of more efficient and effective sparse models. The adaptability introduced by the threshold-based router paves the way for models that dynamically adjust their computational strategies based on token complexity—a feature that could revolutionize processing efficiency in large-scale models.
  3. Speculations on Future Developments: Looking ahead, the insights garnered from XMoE's implementation could inspire the development of hardware specifically designed to optimize the execution of sparse computational tasks. Furthermore, extending XMoE's principles to a broader array of tasks and exploring its scalability to even larger models present promising avenues for future research.

Conclusion

In sum, XMoE heralds a significant step forward in enhancing the efficiency of sparse models through the strategic employment of smaller experts and an adaptive, threshold-based routing mechanism. The model's demonstrated efficacy across various tasks, coupled with its potential to markedly reduce computational costs, underscores the pivotal role that such innovations could play in the ongoing advancement of MoE models and generative AI at large. The research also lays the groundwork for future investigations aimed at further refining and extending the capabilities of sparse computational models.

Limitations and Future Work

While XMoE marks a notable advancement in sparse model efficiency, its exploration remains restricted to specific NLP tasks and a relatively smaller model scale due to computational resource constraints. Future studies are encouraged to evaluate XMoE's effectiveness across a wider range of tasks and at the scale of larger model architectures. Moreover, the optimal size of experts within XMoE begs for further exploration to balance the trade-off between computational efficiency and performance effectively.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (28)
  1. Language models are few-shot learners. ArXiv.
  2. Sparse moe as the new dropout: Scaling dense and self-slimmable transformers. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2023, Kigali, Rwanda, May 1-5, 2023.
  3. Scaling instruction-finetuned language models. ArXiv.
  4. Knowledge neurons in pretrained transformers. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 8493–8502, Dublin, Ireland. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  5. Switch transformers: Scaling to trillion parameter models with simple and efficient sparsity. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 23:120:1–120:39.
  6. Transformer feed-forward layers are key-value memories. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 5484–5495, Online and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  7. Aaron Gokaslan and Vanya Cohen. 2019. Openwebtext corpus.
  8. Sparse is enough in scaling transformers. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:9895–9907.
  9. Large memory layers with product keys. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2019, NeurIPS 2019, December 8-14, 2019, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pages 8546–8557.
  10. Gshard: Scaling giant models with conditional computation and automatic sharding. In 9th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2021, Virtual Event, Austria, May 3-7, 2021. OpenReview.net.
  11. BASE layers: Simplifying training of large, sparse models. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2021, 18-24 July 2021, Virtual Event, volume 139 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 6265–6274. PMLR.
  12. Adaptive gating in mixture-of-experts based language models. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 3577–3587, Singapore. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  13. The lazy neuron phenomenon: On emergence of activation sparsity in transformers. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2023, Kigali, Rwanda, May 1-5, 2023.
  14. Pointer sentinel mixture models. In 5th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2017, Toulon, France, April 24-26, 2017, Conference Track Proceedings. OpenReview.net.
  15. fairseq: A fast, extensible toolkit for sequence modeling. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Demonstrations), pages 48–53, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  16. From sparse to soft mixtures of experts. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations.
  17. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog, 1(8):9.
  18. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 21:140:1–140:67.
  19. Deepspeed-moe: Advancing mixture-of-experts inference and training to power next-generation AI scale. In International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2022, 17-23 July 2022, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, volume 162, pages 18332–18346.
  20. Hash layers for large sparse models. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2021, NeurIPS 2021, December 6-14, 2021, virtual, pages 17555–17566.
  21. Outrageously large neural networks: The sparsely-gated mixture-of-experts layer. In 5th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2017, Toulon, France, April 24-26, 2017, Conference Track Proceedings.
  22. Megatron-lm: Training multi-billion parameter language models using model parallelism. CoRR, abs/1909.08053.
  23. Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models. ArXiv.
  24. Attention is all you need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2017, December 4-9, 2017, Long Beach, CA, USA, pages 5998–6008.
  25. Exploring sparse expert models and beyond. CoRR, abs/2105.15082.
  26. MoEfication: Transformer feed-forward layers are mixtures of experts. In Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022, pages 877–890, Dublin, Ireland. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  27. Mixture-of-experts with expert choice routing. In NeurIPS.
  28. St-moe: Designing stable and transferable sparse expert models.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (6)
  1. Yuanhang Yang (8 papers)
  2. Shiyi Qi (9 papers)
  3. Wenchao Gu (10 papers)
  4. Chaozheng Wang (28 papers)
  5. Cuiyun Gao (97 papers)
  6. Zenglin Xu (145 papers)
Citations (1)
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets