Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
162 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Distributional Treatment Effect with Latent Rank Invariance (2403.18503v2)

Published 27 Mar 2024 in econ.EM

Abstract: Treatment effect heterogeneity is of a great concern when evaluating the treatment. However, even with a simple case of a binary random treatment, the distribution of treatment effect is difficult to identify due to the fundamental limitation that we cannot observe both treated potential outcome and untreated potential outcome for a given individual. This paper assumes a conditional independence assumption that the two potential outcomes are independent of each other given a scalar latent variable. Using two proxy variables, we identify conditional distribution of the potential outcomes given the latent variable. To pin down the location of the latent variable, we assume strict monotonicty on some functional of the conditional distribution; with specific example of strictly increasing conditional expectation, we label the latent variable as 'latent rank' and motivate the identifying assumption as 'latent rank invariance.'

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (10)
  1. Callaway, Brantly and Tong Li, “Quantile treatment effects in difference in differences models with panel data,” Quantitative Economics, 2019, 10 (4), 1579–1618.
  2. Deaner, Ben, “Proxy Controls and Panel Data,” 2023.
  3. Fan, Yanqin and Sang Soo Park, “Sharp bounds on the distribution of treatment effects and their statistical inference,” Econometric Theory, 2010, 26 (3), 931–951.
  4. Frandsen, Brigham R and Lars J Lefgren, “Partial identification of the distribution of treatment effects with an application to the Knowledge is Power Program (KIPP),” Quantitative Economics, 2021, 12 (1), 143–171.
  5. Henry, Marc, Yuichi Kitamura, and Bernard Salanié, “Partial identification of finite mixtures in econometric models,” Quantitative Economics, 2014, 5 (1), 123–144.
  6. Hu, Yingyao and Susanne M Schennach, “Instrumental variable treatment of nonclassical measurement error models,” Econometrica, 2008, 76 (1), 195–216.
  7. Kaji, Tetsuya and Jianfei Cao, “Assessing Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects,” 2023.
  8. Kedagni, Desire, “Identifying treatment effects in the presence of confounded types,” Journal of Econometrics, 2023, 234 (2), 479–511.
  9. Miao, Wang, Zhi Geng, and Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen, “Identifying causal effects with proxy variables of an unmeasured confounder,” Biometrika, 2018, 105 (4), 987–993.
  10. Noh, Sungho, “Nonparametric identification and estimation of heterogeneous causal effects under conditional independence,” Econometric Reviews, 2023, 42 (3), 307–341.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.