Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

UCxn: Typologically Informed Annotation of Constructions Atop Universal Dependencies (2403.17748v1)

Published 26 Mar 2024 in cs.CL

Abstract: The Universal Dependencies (UD) project has created an invaluable collection of treebanks with contributions in over 140 languages. However, the UD annotations do not tell the full story. Grammatical constructions that convey meaning through a particular combination of several morphosyntactic elements -- for example, interrogative sentences with special markers and/or word orders -- are not labeled holistically. We argue for (i) augmenting UD annotations with a 'UCxn' annotation layer for such meaning-bearing grammatical constructions, and (ii) approaching this in a typologically informed way so that morphosyntactic strategies can be compared across languages. As a case study, we consider five construction families in ten languages, identifying instances of each construction in UD treebanks through the use of morphosyntactic patterns. In addition to findings regarding these particular constructions, our study yields important insights on methodology for describing and identifying constructions in language-general and language-particular ways, and lays the foundation for future constructional enrichment of UD treebanks.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (14)
  1. Leonie Weissweiler (19 papers)
  2. Nina Böbel (1 paper)
  3. Kirian Guiller (1 paper)
  4. Santiago Herrera (2 papers)
  5. Wesley Scivetti (5 papers)
  6. Arthur Lorenzi (2 papers)
  7. Nurit Melnik (1 paper)
  8. Archna Bhatia (9 papers)
  9. Hinrich Schütze (250 papers)
  10. Lori Levin (17 papers)
  11. Amir Zeldes (41 papers)
  12. Joakim Nivre (30 papers)
  13. William Croft (5 papers)
  14. Nathan Schneider (50 papers)
Citations (1)

Summary

UCxn: A Framework for Annotating Meaning-Bearing Grammatical Constructions across Languages

Introduction to UCxn

The paper presents UCxn, an innovative framework designed to augment the Universal Dependencies (UD) treebanks with annotations of meaning-bearing grammatical constructions. These constructions are defined as combinations of morphosyntactic elements that convey specific meanings, such as interrogatives, conditionals, and resultatives. While the current UD annotations provide valuable syntactic information, they lack an integrated representation of these larger constructional forms. By addressing this gap, UCxn enables a deeper understanding of grammatical constructions and opens avenues for crosslinguistic comparisons and typological studies.

Challenges and Methodological Approach

The authors identify several challenges in the annotation of grammatical constructions. Firstly, many constructions do not have a direct representation in the UD framework. For instance, interrogative sentences might be identifiable through specific morphosyntactic markers in one language but not in another. Secondly, constructions can manifest in various non-canonical forms, making their identification complex. The paper proposes a typologically informed approach to these challenges, suggesting the augmentation of UD treebanks with UCxn annotations. This approach involves identifying instances of constructions across languages through the application of morphosyntactic patterns.

Case Studies

Five construction families (interrogatives, existentials, conditionals, resultatives, and NPN constructions) across ten languages were selected for case studies. These studies revealed both the feasibility of the UCxn framework and the diversity in constructional strategies across languages. For example, the investigation into interrogative constructions highlighted differences in the use of WH-words and word order across languages. Similarly, the analysis of existential constructions showed variations in the use of expletive subjects and locative elements. The paper presents detailed findings for each construction family, reflecting on methodological insights and linguistic observations.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

The UCxn framework enriches the understanding of constructional phenomena in individual languages and facilitates crosslinguistic analysis. Theoretically, it supports construction grammar perspectives by providing empirical data on how meaning is constructed through grammatical forms. Practically, the construction annotations have potential applications in various NLP tasks, including semantic parsing and language learning resources. Moreover, the UCxn annotations can inform the refinement of UD guidelines and contribute to the development of language-specific Constructicons.

Speculations on Future Developments in AI and Linguistics

The integration of UCxn annotations with UD treebanks represents a pivotal step toward a comprehensive linguistic analysis that includes both syntactic structures and meaning-bearing constructions. In the future, this initiative could lead to more sophisticated AI models capable of understanding and generating human language with a deeper appreciation of grammatical nuance. Additionally, as the UCxn framework evolves, it may offer new insights into linguistic typology, advancing our understanding of language universals and diversities.

Conclusion

The UCxn framework marks a significant advancement in the annotation of meaning-bearing grammatical constructions across languages. Through its integration with Universal Dependencies treebanks, it paves the way for detailed linguistic analysis and crosslinguistic studies. Future work will focus on expanding the range of constructions and languages covered, refining annotation methodologies, and exploring the implications for both theoretical linguistics and artificial intelligence.