Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
129 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
28 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Grad-CAMO: Learning Interpretable Single-Cell Morphological Profiles from 3D Cell Painting Images (2403.17615v1)

Published 26 Mar 2024 in eess.IV, cs.CV, and q-bio.QM

Abstract: Despite their black-box nature, deep learning models are extensively used in image-based drug discovery to extract feature vectors from single cells in microscopy images. To better understand how these networks perform representation learning, we employ visual explainability techniques (e.g., Grad-CAM). Our analyses reveal several mechanisms by which supervised models cheat, exploiting biologically irrelevant pixels when extracting morphological features from images, such as noise in the background. This raises doubts regarding the fidelity of learned single-cell representations and their relevance when investigating downstream biological questions. To address this misalignment between researcher expectations and machine behavior, we introduce Grad-CAMO, a novel single-cell interpretability score for supervised feature extractors. Grad-CAMO measures the proportion of a model's attention that is concentrated on the cell of interest versus the background. This metric can be assessed per-cell or averaged across a validation set, offering a tool to audit individual features vectors or guide the improved design of deep learning architectures. Importantly, Grad-CAMO seamlessly integrates into existing workflows, requiring no dataset or model modifications, and is compatible with both 2D and 3D Cell Painting data. Additional results are available at https://github.com/eigenvivek/Grad-CAMO.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (14)
  1. Rapid prototyping of thermoplastic microfluidic 3D cell culture devices by creating regional hydrophilicity discrepancy. Advanced Science, 11(7):2304332, 2024.
  2. Cell Painting, a high-content image-based assay for morphological profiling using multiplexed fluorescent dyes. Nature Protocols, 11(9):1757–1774, 2016.
  3. Emerging properties in self-supervised vision transformers. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 2021.
  4. CellProfiler: image analysis software for identifying and quantifying cell phenotypes. Genome Biology, 7:1–11, 2006.
  5. SN Chandrasekaran et al. JUMP Cell Painting dataset: morphological impact of 136,000 chemical and genetic perturbations en. pages: 2023.03. 23.534023 section: New results. mar. 2023, 2023.
  6. Sigrid A Langhans. Three-dimensional in vitro cell culture models in drug discovery and drug repositioning. Frontiers in Pharmacology, 9:334617, 2018.
  7. UMAP: Uniform manifold approximation and projection for dimension reduction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.03426, 2018.
  8. Deep learning for cellular image analysis. Nature Methods, 16(12):1233–1246, 2019.
  9. Learning representations for image-based profiling of perturbations. Nature Communications, 15(1):1594, 2024.
  10. Self-supervised vision transformers accurately decode cellular state heterogeneity. bioRxiv, pages 2023–01, 2023.
  11. Grad-CAM: Visual explanations from deep networks via gradient-based localization. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 618–626, 2017.
  12. Cellpose: a generalist algorithm for cellular segmentation. Nature Methods, 18(1):100–106, 2021.
  13. RxRx1: A dataset for evaluating experimental batch correction methods. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 4284–4293, 2023.
  14. EfficientNet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 6105–6114. PMLR, 2019.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com