Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
139 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Control Designs for Critical-Continegency Responsible Grid-Following Inverters and Seamless Transitions To and From Grid-Forming Modes (2403.15380v1)

Published 22 Mar 2024 in eess.SY and cs.SY

Abstract: This article introduces two control frameworks: one for Grid-Following (GFL) inverters aiding Grid-Forming (GFM) inverters in voltage regulation during large contingency events and optimizing power transactions under normal conditions; and another for seamless transitions between grid-tied and grid-isolated setups, managing voltage transient characteristics. In microgrids, GFM inverters regulate voltage, while GFL inverters handle power transactions. The proposed GFL control detects abrupt load/generation changes, adjusting power transactions using local storage to support GFM inverters during contingencies. Additionally, a transition control ensures smooth GFL-GFM shifts, reducing power and voltage fluctuations. Simulation results validate improved voltage regulation during contingencies and enhanced power tracking during slow changes, alongside minimized transient overshoot.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (9)
  1. M. Elkhatib, J. Neely, and J. Johnson, “Evaluation of fast-frequency support functions in high penetration isolated power systems,” in 2017 IEEE 44th Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC).   IEEE, 2017, pp. 2141–2146.
  2. Y. Qi, H. Deng, X. Liu, and Y. Tang, “Synthetic inertia control of grid-connected inverter considering the synchronization dynamics,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 1411–1421, 2021.
  3. J. Wang and G. Saraswat, “Study of inverter control strategies on the stability of low-inertia microgrid systems,” in IECON 2022–48th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.   IEEE, 2022, pp. 1–6.
  4. S. Chakraborty, S. Patel, G. Saraswat, A. Maqsood, and M. V. Salapaka, “Seamless transition of critical infrastructures using droop controlled grid-forming inverters,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 2023.
  5. A. Askarian, J. Park, and S. Salapaka, “Enhanced grid following inverter (e-gfl): A unified control framework for stiff and weak grids,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 2024.
  6. Q.-C. Zhong and Y. Zeng, “Universal droop control of inverters with different types of output impedance,” IEEE access, vol. 4, pp. 702–712, 2016.
  7. J. Driesen and K. Visscher, “Virtual synchronous generators,” in 2008 IEEE power and energy society general meeting-conversion and delivery of electrical energy in the 21st century.   IEEE, 2008, pp. 1–3.
  8. J. Liu, Y. Miura, and T. Ise, “Comparison of dynamic characteristics between virtual synchronous generator and droop control in inverter-based distributed generators,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 3600–3611, 2015.
  9. A. Askarian, J. Park, and S. Salapaka, “Control design for inverters: Beyond steady-state droop laws,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.02292, 2021.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.