Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
129 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
28 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

SDP Synthesis of Maximum Coverage Trees for Probabilistic Planning under Control Constraints (2403.14605v1)

Published 21 Mar 2024 in cs.RO, cs.SY, and eess.SY

Abstract: The paper presents Maximal Covariance Backward Reachable Trees (MAXCOVAR BRT), which is a multi-query algorithm for planning of dynamic systems under stochastic motion uncertainty and constraints on the control input with explicit coverage guarantees. In contrast to existing roadmap-based probabilistic planning methods that sample belief nodes randomly and draw edges between them \cite{csbrm_tro2024}, under control constraints, the reachability of belief nodes needs to be explicitly established and is determined by checking the feasibility of a non-convex program. Moreover, there is no explicit consideration of coverage of the roadmap while adding nodes and edges during the construction procedure for the existing methods. Our contribution is a novel optimization formulation to add nodes and construct the corresponding edge controllers such that the generated roadmap results in provably maximal coverage under control constraints as compared to any other method of adding nodes and edges. We characterize formally the notion of coverage of a roadmap in this stochastic domain via introduction of the h-$\operatorname{BRS}$ (Backward Reachable Set of Distributions) of a tree of distributions under control constraints, and also support our method with extensive simulations on a 6 DoF model.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (14)
  1. D. Zheng, J. Ridderhof, Z. Zhang, P. Tsiotras, and A.-A. Agha-mohammadi, “Cs-brm: A probabilistic roadmap for consistent belief space planning with reachability guarantees,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2024.
  2. L. E. Kavraki, P. Svestka, J.-C. Latombe, and M. H. Overmars, “Probabilistic roadmaps for path planning in high-dimensional configuration spaces,” IEEE transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 566–580, 1996.
  3. V. N. Hartmann, M. P. Strub, M. Toussaint, and J. D. Gammell, “Effort informed roadmaps (eirm*): Efficient asymptotically optimal multiquery planning by actively reusing validation effort,” in The International Symposium of Robotics Research, pp. 555–571, Springer, 2022.
  4. R. Tedrake, I. R. Manchester, M. Tobenkin, and J. W. Roberts, “Lqr-trees: Feedback motion planning via sums-of-squares verification,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1038–1052, 2010.
  5. A. Majumdar, M. Tobenkin, and R. Tedrake, “Multi-query feedback motion planning with lqr-roadmaps,” 2011.
  6. A. Majumdar and R. Tedrake, “Funnel libraries for real-time robust feedback motion planning,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 947–982, 2017.
  7. M. K. M Jaffar and M. Otte, “Pip-x: Online feedback motion planning/replanning in dynamic environments using invariant funnels,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, p. 02783649231209340, 2023.
  8. B. Luders, M. Kothari, and J. How, “Chance constrained rrt for probabilistic robustness to environmental uncertainty,” in AIAA guidance, navigation, and control conference, p. 8160, 2010.
  9. B. D. Luders, Robust sampling-based motion planning for autonomous vehicles in uncertain environments. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2014.
  10. A.-A. Agha-Mohammadi, S. Chakravorty, and N. M. Amato, “Firm: Sampling-based feedback motion-planning under motion uncertainty and imperfect measurements,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 268–304, 2014.
  11. K. Okamoto, M. Goldshtein, and P. Tsiotras, “Optimal covariance control for stochastic systems under chance constraints,” IEEE Control Systems Letters, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 266–271, 2018.
  12. F. Liu, G. Rapakoulias, and P. Tsiotras, “Optimal covariance steering for discrete-time linear stochastic systems,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.00618, 2022.
  13. G. Rapakoulias and P. Tsiotras, “Discrete-time optimal covariance steering via semidefinite programming,” arXiv e-prints, pp. arXiv–2302, 2023.
  14. S. Diamond and S. Boyd, “Cvxpy: A python-embedded modeling language for convex optimization,” The Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 2909–2913, 2016.
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.