Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

On the Power of Quantum Distributed Proofs (2403.14108v1)

Published 21 Mar 2024 in quant-ph and cs.DC

Abstract: Quantum nondeterministic distributed computing was recently introduced as dQMA (distributed quantum Merlin-Arthur) protocols by Fraigniaud, Le Gall, Nishimura and Paz (ITCS 2021). In dQMA protocols, with the help of quantum proofs and local communication, nodes on a network verify a global property of the network. Fraigniaud et al. showed that, when the network size is small, there exists an exponential separation in proof size between distributed classical and quantum verification protocols, for the equality problem, where the verifiers check if all the data owned by a subset of them are identical. In this paper, we further investigate and characterize the power of the dQMA protocols for various decision problems. First, we give a more efficient dQMA protocol for the equality problem with a simpler analysis. This is done by adding a symmetrization step on each node and exploiting properties of the permutation test, which is a generalization of the SWAP test. We also show a quantum advantage for the equality problem on path networks still persists even when the network size is large, by considering ``relay points'' between extreme nodes. Second, we show that even in a general network, there exist efficient dQMA protocols for the ranking verification problem, the Hamming distance problem, and more problems that derive from efficient quantum one-way communication protocols. Third, in a line network, we construct an efficient dQMA protocol for a problem that has an efficient two-party QMA communication protocol. Finally, we obtain the first lower bounds on the proof and communication cost of dQMA protocols. To prove a lower bound on the equality problem, we show any dQMA protocol with an entangled proof between nodes can be simulated with a dQMA protocol with a separable proof between nodes by using a QMA communication-complete problem introduced by Raz and Shpilka (CCC 2004).

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (75)
  1. Scott Aaronson. The complexity of quantum states and transformations: from quantum money to black holes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.05256, 2016.
  2. What can be computed without communications? ACM SIGACT News, 45(3):82–104, 2014.
  3. Quantum circuits with mixed states. In Proceedings of the 30th annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing (STOC 1998), pages 20–30, 1998.
  4. Quantum NP - A Survey. arXiv preprint quant-ph/0210077, 2002.
  5. Stabilization of quantum computations by symmetrization. SIAM Journal on Computing, 26(5):1541–1557, 1997.
  6. Metric graph theory and geometry: a survey. Contemporary Mathematics, 453:49–86, 2008.
  7. Efficient Quantum Circuits for Schur and Clebsch-Gordan Transforms. Phys. Rev. Lett., 97:170502, 2006.
  8. Nonlocality and communication complexity. Reviews of Modern Physics, 82(1):665, 2010.
  9. Quantum fingerprinting. Phys. Rev. Lett., 87:167902, 2001.
  10. Communication complexity lower bounds by polynomials. In Proceedings 16th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC 2001), pages 120–130, 2001.
  11. Fast quantum byzantine agreement. In Proceedings of the thirty-seventh annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing (STOC 2005), pages 481–485, 2005.
  12. Can quantum mechanics help distributed computing? ACM SIGACT News, 39(3):67–76, 2008.
  13. Victor Chepoi. Isometric subgraphs of hamming graphs and d-convexity. Cybernetics, 24(1):6–11, 1988.
  14. Victor Chepoi. Distance-preserving subgraphs of johnson graphs. Combinatorica, 37(6):1039–1055, 2017.
  15. Quantum Distributed Algorithms for Detection of Cliques. In Proceedings of 13th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2022), volume 215 of LIPIcs, pages 35:1–35:25, 2022.
  16. Matthias Christandl. The Structure of Bipartite Quantum States - Insights from Group Theory and Cryptography. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, 2006.
  17. Consequences and limits of nonlocal strategies. In Proceedings. 19th IEEE Annual Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC 2004), pages 236–249, 2004.
  18. Weak fourier-schur sampling, the hidden subgroup problem, and the quantum collision problem. In Proceedings of 24th Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2007), pages 598–609, 2007.
  19. No distributed quantum advantage for approximate graph coloring. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.09444, 2023.
  20. Geometry of cuts and metrics, volume 15 of Algorithms and combinatorics. Springer, 1997.
  21. Quantum sketching protocols for hamming distance and beyond. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.12808, 2018.
  22. Distributed quantum computing: A new frontier in distributed systems or science fiction? ACM SIGACT News, 39(3):77–95, 2008.
  23. Ronald de Wolf. Quantum Computing and Communication Complexity. PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam, 2001.
  24. Ronald de Wolf. Quantum communication and complexity. Theoretical computer science, 287(1):337–353, 2002.
  25. Ronald de Wolf. Quantum computing: Lecture notes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.09415, 2019.
  26. Can quantum communication speed up distributed computation? In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM symposium on Principles of distributed computing (PODC 2014), pages 166–175, 2014.
  27. Distributed Quantum Proofs for Replicated Data. In Proceedings of 12th Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference (ITCS 2021), volume 185 of LIPIcs, pages 28:1–28:20, 2021.
  28. Randomized proof-labeling schemes. Distributed Computing, 32:217–234, 2019.
  29. Pierre Fraigniaud. Distributed computational complexities: are you volvo-addicted or nascar-obsessed? In Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS symposium on Principles of distributed computing (PODC 2010), pages 171–172, 2010.
  30. Christopher A Fuchs and Jeroen van de Graaf. Cryptographic distinguishability measures for quantum-mechanical states. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 45(4):1216–1227, 1999.
  31. Sevag Gharibian. Guest column: The 7 faces of quantum NP. ACM SIGACT News, 54(4):54–91, 2024.
  32. Quantum communication cannot simulate a public coin. arXiv preprint quant-ph/0411051, 2004.
  33. Strengths and weaknesses of quantum fingerprinting. In Proceedings of 21st Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC 2006), pages 288–295, 2006.
  34. What can be observed locally? round-based models for quantum distributed computing. In Proceedings of International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2009), pages 243–257, 2009.
  35. Sublinear-time quantum computation of the diameter in CONGEST networks. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC 2018), pages 337–346, 2018.
  36. Distributed Merlin-Arthur Synthesis of Quantum States and Its Applications. In Proceedings of 48th International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2023), volume 272 of LIPIcs, pages 63:1–63:15, 2023.
  37. Distributed Quantum Interactive Proofs. In Proceedings of 40th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2023), volume 254 of LIPIcs, pages 42:1–42:21, 2023.
  38. Quantum Advantage for the LOCAL Model in Distributed Computing. In 36th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2019), volume 126 of LIPIcs, pages 49:1–49:14, 2019.
  39. Non-trivial lower bound for 3-coloring the ring in the quantum LOCAL model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.02768, 2022.
  40. Locally checkable proofs in distributed computing. Theory of Computing, 12(19):1–33, 2016.
  41. Aram W. Harrow. Applications of coherent classical communication and the Schur transform to quantum information theory. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2005.
  42. Quantum distributed algorithm for the all-pairs shortest path problem in the CONGEST-CLIQUE model. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC 2019), pages 84–93, 2019.
  43. Quantum Distributed Algorithm for Triangle Finding in the CONGEST Model. In 37th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2020), volume 154 of LIPIcs, pages 23:1–23:13, 2020.
  44. A multi-prover interactive proof for NEXP sound against entangled provers. In 2012 IEEE 53rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 2012), pages 243–252, 2012.
  45. Extensions of lipschitz mappings into a hilbert space. In Conference on Modern Analysis and Probability, volume 26, pages 189–206. American Mathematical Society, 1984.
  46. MIP*= RE. Communications of the ACM, 64(11):131–138, 2021.
  47. Proof labeling schemes. Distributed Computing, 22(4):215–233, 2010.
  48. Hartmut Klauck. On Arthur Merlin games in communication complexity. In Proceedings of 26th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC 2011), pages 189–199, 2011.
  49. Communication Complexity. Cambridge University Press, 1996.
  50. The efficiency of quantum identity testing of multiple states. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 41(39):395309, 2008.
  51. Interactive distributed proofs. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC 2018), pages 255–264, 2018.
  52. Two results about quantum messages. In International Symposium on Mathematical Foundations of Computer Science (MFCS 2014), pages 445–456. Springer, 2014.
  53. Classical and quantum computation. Number 47. American Mathematical Soc., 2002.
  54. Quantum and randomized communication complexity of XOR functions in the SMP model. Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC), TR13-010, 2013.
  55. Matthew McKague. On the power quantum computation over real Hilbert spaces. International Journal of Quantum Information, 11(01):1350001, 2013.
  56. A Survey of Quantum Property Testing. Number 7 in Graduate Surveys. Theory of Computing Library, 2016.
  57. Quantum distributed complexity of set disjointness on a line. ACM Transactions on Computation Theory (TOCT), 14(1):1–22, 2022.
  58. Quantum Arthur–Merlin games. computational complexity, 14:122–152, 2005.
  59. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information: 10th Anniversary Edition. Cambridge University Press, 2010.
  60. The power of distributed verifiers in interactive proofs. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA 2020), pages 1096–1115, 2020.
  61. NEEXP is contained in MIP*. In 2019 IEEE 60th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 2019), pages 510–518, 2019.
  62. David Peleg. Distributed computing: a locality-sensitive approach. SIAM, 2000.
  63. Bill Rosgen. Distinguishing Short Quantum Computations. In 25th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2008), volume 1 of LIPIcs, pages 597–608, 2008.
  64. On the power of quantum proofs. In Proceedings 19th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity (CCC 2004), pages 260–274, 2004. Full version is availabie from the following URL: https://www.cs.tau.ac.il/~shpilka/publications/RazShpilka_QMA.pdf. Last visited on 2024/01/03.
  65. Communication Complexity: and Applications. Cambridge University Press, 2020.
  66. Andrew J Scott. Tight informationally complete quantum measurements. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General, 39(43):13507, 2006.
  67. Alexander A Sherstov. The pattern matrix method. SIAM Journal on Computing, 40(6):1969–2000, 2011.
  68. Sergey V Shpectorov. On scale embeddings of graphs into hypercubes. European Journal of Combinatorics, 14(2):117–130, 1993.
  69. Exact quantum algorithms for the leader election problem. ACM Transactions on Computation Theory (TOCT), 4(1):1–24, 2012.
  70. Armin Uhlmann. The “transition probability” in the state space of a *-algebra. Reports on Mathematical Physics, 9(2):273–279, 1976.
  71. Joran van Apeldoorn and Tijn de Vos. A framework for distributed quantum queries in the congest model. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC 2022), pages 109–119, 2022.
  72. John Watrous. The Theory of Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, 2018.
  73. Quantum complexity of weighted diameter and radius in congest networks. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC 2022), pages 120–130, 2022.
  74. Andrew Chi-Chih Yao. On the power of quantum fingerprinting. In Proceedings of the 34th annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing (STOC 2003), pages 77–81, 2003.
  75. Shengyu Zhang. On the power of lower bound methods for one-way quantum communication complexity. In International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2011), pages 49–60, 2011.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Atsuya Hasegawa (5 papers)
  2. Srijita Kundu (19 papers)
  3. Harumichi Nishimura (37 papers)
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets