Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
125 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

"It's Not a Replacement:" Enabling Parent-Robot Collaboration to Support In-Home Learning Experiences of Young Children (2403.14041v1)

Published 20 Mar 2024 in cs.HC and cs.RO

Abstract: Learning companion robots for young children are increasingly adopted in informal learning environments. Although parents play a pivotal role in their children's learning, very little is known about how parents prefer to incorporate robots into their children's learning activities. We developed prototype capabilities for a learning companion robot to deliver educational prompts and responses to parent-child pairs during reading sessions and conducted in-home user studies involving 10 families with children aged 3-5. Our data indicates that parents want to work with robots as collaborators to augment parental activities to foster children's learning, introducing the notion of parent-robot collaboration. Our findings offer an empirical understanding of the needs and challenges of parent-child interaction in informal learning scenarios and design opportunities for integrating a companion robot into these interactions. We offer insights into how robots might be designed to facilitate parent-robot collaboration, including parenting policies, collaboration patterns, and interaction paradigms.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (62)
  1. Can children learn creativity from a social robot? In Proceedings of the 2019 on Creativity and Cognition. 359–368.
  2. Social robots for education: A review. Science robotics 3, 21 (2018), eaat5954.
  3. Parenting with Alexa: exploring the introduction of smart speakers on family dynamics. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–13.
  4. Belinda Blevins-Knabe and Ann M Berghout Austin. 2016. Early childhood mathematics skill development in the home environment. Springer.
  5. LaVonda N Brown and Ayanna M Howard. 2014. The positive effects of verbal encouragement in mathematics education using a social robot. In 2014 IEEE integrated STEM education conference. IEEE, 1–5.
  6. Investigating family perceptions and design preferences for an in-home robot. In Proceedings of the interaction design and children conference. 229–242.
  7. WAKEY: assisting parent-child communication for better morning routines. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 2287–2299.
  8. Designing Long-term Parent-child-robot Triadic Interaction at Home through Lived Technology Experiences and Interviews. In 2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 401–408.
  9. Teaching and learning with children: Impact of reciprocal peer learning with a social robot on children’s learning and emotive engagement. Computers & Education 150 (2020), 103836.
  10. Victoria Clarke and Virginia Braun. 2014. Thematic analysis. In Encyclopedia of critical psychology. Springer, 1947–1952.
  11. Working with a social robot in school: a long-term real-world unsupervised deployment. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 63–72.
  12. The role of parents in the engagement of young children with digital technologies: Exploring tensions between rights of access and protection, from ‘Gatekeepers’ to ‘Scaffolders’. Global Studies of Childhood 6, 4 (2016), 414–427.
  13. Ann Dowker. 2021. Home Numeracy and Preschool Children’s Mathematical Development: Is Parental Mathematics Anxiety an Understudied Factor?. In Frontiers in Education, Vol. 6. Frontiers, 2.
  14. School readiness and later achievement. Developmental psychology 43, 6 (2007), 1428.
  15. Aykut Durak and Hüseyin Kaygin. 2020. Parental mediation of young children’s internet use: Adaptation of parental mediation scale and review of parental mediation based on the demographic variables and digital data security awareness. Education and Information Technologies 25 (2020), 2275–2296.
  16. Understanding sources of individual variability in parents’ number talk with young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 159 (2017), 1–15.
  17. Teaching students what they already know? The (mis) alignment between mathematics instructional content and student knowledge in kindergarten. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 35, 2 (2013), 157–178.
  18. ” That Robot Played with Us!” Children’s Perceptions of a Robot after a Child-Robot Group Interaction. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6, CSCW2 (2022), 1–23.
  19. Multiple dimensions of family involvement and their relations to behavioral and learning competencies for urban, low-income children. School psychology review 33, 4 (2004), 467–480.
  20. Home influence on school learning: Direct and indirect effects of parental involvement on high school grades. The Journal of Educational Research 80, 6 (1987), 330–337.
  21. Affective personalization of a social robot tutor for children’s second language skills. In Proceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, Vol. 30.
  22. Patricc: A platform for triadic interaction with changeable characters. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction. 399–407.
  23. Alma Harris and Janet Goodall. 2008. Do parents know they matter? Engaging all parents in learning. Educational research 50, 3 (2008), 277–289.
  24. Robotic transformative service research: deploying social robots for consumer well-being during COVID-19 and beyond. Journal of Service Management 31, 6 (2020), 1131–1148.
  25. Parent academic involvement as related to school behavior, achievement, and aspirations: Demographic variations across adolescence. Child development 75, 5 (2004), 1491–1509.
  26. RoboMath: Designing a learning companion robot to support children’s numerical skills. In Interaction Design and Children. 283–293.
  27. Designing Parent-child-robot Interactions to Facilitate In-Home Parental Math Talk with Young Children. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.02525 (2023).
  28. Cynthia Hoffner and Martha Buchanan. 2002. Parents’ responses to television violence: The third-person perception, parental mediation, and support for censorship. Media Psychology 4, 3 (2002), 231–252.
  29. Eric Horvitz. 1999. Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 159–166.
  30. Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 17–24.
  31. Children learning with a social robot. In Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 351–358.
  32. Social robot tutoring for child second language learning. In 2016 11th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI). IEEE, 231–238.
  33. Elementary and middle school teachers’, students’ and parents’ perception of robot-aided education in Korea. In EdMedia+ Innovate Learning. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), 175–183.
  34. Personalizing robot tutors to individuals’ learning differences. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-robot interaction. 423–430.
  35. The physical presence of a robot tutor increases cognitive learning gains. In Proceedings of the annual meeting of the cognitive science society, Vol. 34.
  36. Robotic platform for teaching maths in junior high school. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) 12, 4 (2018), 1349–1360.
  37. The desire for social robots to support English language learners: Exploring robot perceptions of teachers, parents, and students. In Frontiers in Education, Vol. 6. Frontiers Media SA, 566909.
  38. Brent A McBride and Gail Mills. 1993. A comparison of mother and father involvement with their preschool age children. Early childhood research quarterly 8, 4 (1993), 457–477.
  39. Reliability and inter-rater reliability in qualitative research: Norms and guidelines for CSCW and HCI practice. Proceedings of the ACM on human-computer interaction 3, CSCW (2019), 1–23.
  40. ” Off Script:” Design Opportunities Emerging from Long-Term Social Robot Interactions In-the-Wild. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 378–387.
  41. Joseph E Michaelis and Bilge Mutlu. 2018. Reading socially: Transforming the in-home reading experience with a learning-companion robot. Science Robotics 3, 21 (2018), eaat5999.
  42. Joseph E Michaelis and Bilge Mutlu. 2019. Supporting interest in science learning with a social robot. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children. 71–82.
  43. Recruitment and retention strategies in longitudinal clinical studies with low-income populations. Contemporary clinical trials 32, 3 (2011), 353–362.
  44. Peter Nikken and Jeroen Jansz. 2006. Parental mediation of children’s videogame playing: A comparison of the reports by parents and children. Learning, media and technology 31, 2 (2006), 181–202.
  45. Children’s preference of appearance and parents’ attitudes towards assistive robots. In 2014 IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots. IEEE, 360–365.
  46. Parent and teacher perceptions of outcomes for typically developing children enrolled in integrated early childhood programs: A statewide survey. Journal of early intervention 16, 1 (1992), 53–63.
  47. David J Purpura and Christopher J Lonigan. 2013. Informal numeracy skills: The structure and relations among numbering, relations, and arithmetic operations in preschool. American Educational Research Journal 50, 1 (2013), 178–209.
  48. Causal connections between mathematical language and mathematical knowledge: A dialogic reading intervention. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 10, 1 (2017), 116–137.
  49. Personalized robot tutoring using the assistive tutor pOMDP (AT-POMDP). In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 33. 8050–8057.
  50. Adaptive robot language tutoring based on Bayesian knowledge tracing and predictive decision-making. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. 128–136.
  51. Comparisons of levels and predictors of mothers’ and fathers’ engagement with their preschool-aged children. Early child development and care 183, 3-4 (2013), 498–514.
  52. Selcuk R Sirin. 2005. Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of educational research 75, 3 (2005), 417–453.
  53. It wasn’t really about the PokéMon: parents’ perspectives on a location-based mobile game. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1483–1496.
  54. Esther Ho Sui-Chu and J Douglas Willms. 1996. Effects of parental involvement on eighth-grade achievement. Sociology of education (1996), 126–141.
  55. Fumihide Tanaka and Takeshi Kimura. 2009. The use of robots in early education: a scenario based on ethical consideration. In RO-MAN 2009-The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, 558–560.
  56. Nils F Tolksdorf and Katharina J Rohlfing. 2020. Parents’ views on using social robots for language learning. In 2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). IEEE, 634–640.
  57. Developing a scale to assess three styles of television mediation:“Instructive mediation,”“restrictive mediation,” and “social coviewing”. Journal of broadcasting & electronic media 43, 1 (1999), 52–66.
  58. Teachers’ perspectives on social robots in education: an exploratory case study. In Proceedings of the interaction design and children conference. 273–280.
  59. Numeracy-related exchanges in joint storybook reading and play. International Journal of Early Years Education 17, 1 (2009), 67–84.
  60. Ron Warren. 2001. In words and deeds: Parental involvement and mediation of children’s television viewing. The Journal of Family Communication 1, 4 (2001), 211–231.
  61. A robot as a teaching assistant in an English class. In Sixth IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies (ICALT’06). IEEE, 87–91.
  62. Parental mediation for young children’s use of educational media: A case study with computational toys and kits. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–12.
Citations (4)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets