Robotics meets Fluid Dynamics: A Characterization of the Induced Airflow below a Quadrotor as a Turbulent Jet (2403.13321v3)
Abstract: The widespread adoption of quadrotors for diverse applications, from agriculture to public safety, necessitates an understanding of the aerodynamic disturbances they create. This paper introduces a computationally lightweight model for estimating the time-averaged magnitude of the induced flow below quadrotors in hover. Unlike related approaches that rely on expensive computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations or drone specific time-consuming empirical measurements, our method leverages classical theory from turbulent flows. By analyzing over 16 hours of flight data from drones of varying sizes within a large motion capture system, we show for the first time that the combined flow from all drone propellers is well-approximated by a turbulent jet after 2.5 drone-diameters below the vehicle. Using a novel normalization and scaling, we experimentally identify model parameters that describe a unified mean velocity field below differently sized quadrotors. The model, which requires only the drone's mass, propeller size, and drone size for calculations, accurately describes the far-field airflow over a long-range in a very large volume which is impractical to simulate using CFD. Our model offers a practical tool for ensuring safer operations near humans, optimizing sensor placements and drone control in multi-agent scenarios. We demonstrate the latter by designing a controller that compensates for the downwash of another drone, leading to a four times lower altitude deviation when passing below.
- E. Kaufmann, L. Bauersfeld, A. Loquercio, M. Müller, V. Koltun, and D. Scaramuzza, “Champion-level drone racing using deep reinforcement learning,” Nature, vol. 620, no. 7976, pp. 982–987, Aug 2023.
- R. D’Andrea, “Guest editorial: Can drones deliver?” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2014.
- K. Karydis and V. Kumar, “Energetics in robotic flight at small scales,” Interface Focus, 2017.
- K. Mohta, M. Watterson, Y. Mulgaonkar, S. Liu, C. Qu, A. Makineni, K. Saulnier, K. Sun, A. Zhu, J. Delmerico, K. Karydis, N. Atanasov, G. Loianno, D. Scaramuzza, K. Daniilidis, C. J. Taylor, and V. Kumar, “Fast, autonomous flight in gps-denied and cluttered environments,” Journal of Field Robotics, 2018.
- “DJI Camera Drones,” https://www.dji.com/camera-drones, accessed: 2024-02-25.
- “Flyability Elios-3,” https://www.flyability.com/elios-3, accessed: 2024-02-25.
- “Skydio X10 Drone,” https://www.skydio.com/x10, accessed: 2024-02-25.
- “Parrot Drones,” https://www.parrot.com/us, accessed: 2024-02-25.
- C. E. Comission, “Aerialcore,” https://aerial-core.eu/, accessed: 2024-03-13.
- ——, “Autoassess,” https://autoassess.eu/, accessed: 2024-03-13.
- K. Chang, S. Chen, M. Wang, X. Xue, and Y. Lan, “Numerical simulation and verification of rotor downwash flow field of plant protection uav at different rotor speeds,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 13, 2023.
- N. Simon, A. Z. Ren, A. Piqué, D. Snyder, D. Barretto, M. Hultmark, and A. Majumdar, “Flowdrone: Wind estimation and gust rejection on uavs using fast-response hot-wire flow sensors,” in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). IEEE, May 2023.
- T. F. Villa, F. Salimi, K. Morton, L. Morawska, and F. Gonzalez, “Development and validation of a uav based system for air pollution measurements,” Sensors, vol. 16, no. 12, 2016.
- C. Crazzolara, M. Ebner, A. Platis, T. Miranda, J. Bange, and A. Junginger, “A new multicopter-based unmanned aerial system for pollen and spores collection in the atmospheric boundary layer,” Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 1581–1598, 2019.
- K. A. McKinney, D. Wang, J. Ye, J.-B. de Fouchier, P. C. Guimarães, C. E. Batista, R. A. F. Souza, E. G. Alves, D. Gu, A. B. Guenther, and S. T. Martin, “A sampler for atmospheric volatile organic compounds by copter unmanned aerial vehicles,” Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 3123–3135, June 2019.
- W. Thielicke, W. Hübert, U. Müller, M. Eggert, and P. Wilhelm, “Towards accurate and practical drone-based wind measurements with an ultrasonic anemometer,” Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 1303–1318, 2021.
- M. Ghirardelli, S. T. Kral, N. C. Müller, R. Hann, E. Cheynet, and J. Reuder, “Flow structure around a multicopter drone: A computational fluid dynamics analysis for sensor placement considerations,” Drones, vol. 7, no. 7, 2023.
- C. Paz, E. Suárez, C. Gil, and J. Vence, “Assessment of the methodology for the cfd simulation of the flight of a quadcopter uav,” Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, vol. 218, p. 104776, 2021.
- P. Ventura Diaz and S. Yoon, “High-fidelity computational aerodynamics of multi-rotor unmanned aerial vehicles,” in 2018 AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, 2018, p. 1266.
- J. Luo, L. Zhu, and G. Yan, “Novel quadrotor forward-flight model based on wake interference,” Aiaa Journal, vol. 53, no. 12, pp. 3522–3533, 2015.
- M. Kühn, K. Ehrenfried, J. Bosbach, and C. Wagner, “Large-scale tomographic particle image velocimetry using helium-filled soap bubbles,” Experiments in Fluids, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 929–948, August 2010.
- C. Jux, A. Sciacchitano, J. F. G. Schneiders, and F. Scarano, “Robotic volumetric piv of a full-scale cyclist,” Experiments in Fluids, vol. 59, no. 4, p. 74, Apr 2018.
- R. Mahony, V. Kumar, and P. Corke, “Multirotor aerial vehicles: Modeling, estimation, and control of quadrotor,” IEEE Robotics and Automation magazine, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 20–32, 2012.
- F. Furrer, M. Burri, M. Achtelik, and R. Siegwart, “Rotors—a modular gazebo mav simulator framework,” in Robot Operating System (ROS). Springer, 2016, pp. 595–625.
- S. Shah, D. Dey, C. Lovett, and A. Kapoor, “Airsim: High-fidelity visual and physical simulation for autonomous vehicles,” in Field and service robotics. Springer, 2018, pp. 621–635.
- L. Bauersfeld, E. Kaufmann, P. Foehn, S. Sun, and D. Scaramuzza, “Neurobem: Hybrid aerodynamic quadrotor model,” RSS: Robotics, Science, and Systems, 2021.
- W. Khan and M. Nahon, “Toward an accurate physics-based uav thruster model,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 1269–1279, 2013.
- R. Gill and R. D’Andrea, “Propeller thrust and drag in forward flight,” in 2017 IEEE Conference on Control Technology and Applications (CCTA). IEEE, 2017, pp. 73–79.
- R. Gill and R. D’Andrea, “Computationally efficient force and moment models for propellers in uav forward flight applications,” Drones, vol. 3, no. 4, p. 77, 2019.
- G. Hoffmann, H. Huang, S. Waslander, and C. Tomlin, “Quadrotor helicopter flight dynamics and control: Theory and experiment,” in AIAA guidance, navigation and control conference and exhibit, 2007, p. 6461.
- H. Huang, G. M. Hoffmann, S. L. Waslander, and C. J. Tomlin, “Aerodynamics and control of autonomous quadrotor helicopters in aggressive maneuvering,” in 2009 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation. IEEE, 2009, pp. 3277–3282.
- D. Ragni, B. Van Oudheusden, and F. Scarano, “Non-intrusive aerodynamic loads analysis of an aircraft propeller blade,” Experiments in fluids, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 361–371, 2011.
- W. Westmoreland, R. Tramel, and J. Barber, “Modeling propeller flow-fields using cfd,” in 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 2008, p. 402.
- Y. ZHENG, S. YANG, X. LIU, J. WANG, T. NORTON, J. CHEN, and Y. TAN, “The computational fluid dynamic modeling of downwash flow field for a six-rotor uav,” Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 159, 2018.
- H. Yasuda, K. Kitamura, and Y. Nakamura, “Numerical analysis of flow field and aerodynamic characteristics of a quadrotor,” Transactions of The Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, Space Technology Japan, vol. 11, pp. 61–70, 2013.
- S. Yoon, Nasa, P. V. Diaz, D. D. J. Boyd, W. M. Chan, and C. R. Theodore, “Computational aerodynamic modeling of small quadcopter vehicles,” 2017.
- F. Pätzold, A. Bauknecht, A. Schlerf, D. Sotomayor Zakharov, L. Bretschneider, and A. Lampert, “Flight experiments and numerical simulations for investigating multicopter flow field and structure deformation,” Atmosphere, vol. 14, no. 9, 2023.
- X. Liu, T. Guo, P. Zhang, Z. Jia, and X. Tong, “Extraction of a weak flow field for a multi-rotor unmanned aerial vehicle (uav) using high-speed background-oriented schlieren (bos) technology,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 1, 2022.
- H. Otsuka, M. Kohno, and K. Nagatani, “Flow visualization of wake of a quad-copter in ground effect,” in 6th Asian-Australian Rotorcraft Forum and Heli Japan 2017, ARF 2017, 2017.
- D. Shukla and N. Komerath, “Multirotor drone aerodynamic interaction investigation,” Drones, vol. 2, no. 4, 2018.
- Z. Czyż, P. Karpiński, and W. Stryczniewicz, “Measurement of the flow field generated by multicopter propellers,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 19, 2020.
- G. Hoffmann, H. Huang, S. Waslander, and C. Tomlin, “Quadrotor helicopter flight dynamics and control: Theory and experiment,” in AIAA guidance, navigation and control conf., 2007.
- P. Foehn, E. Kaufmann, A. Romero, R. Penicka, S. Sun, L. Bauersfeld, T. Laengle, G. Cioffi, Y. Song, A. Loquercio, and D. Scaramuzza, “Agilicious: Open-source and open-hardware agile quadrotor for vision-based flight,” Science Robotics, vol. 7, no. 67, 2022.