Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
194 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Look Before You Leap: Socially Acceptable High-Speed Ground Robot Navigation in Crowded Hallways (2403.13284v1)

Published 20 Mar 2024 in cs.RO

Abstract: To operate safely and efficiently, autonomous warehouse/delivery robots must be able to accomplish tasks while navigating in dynamic environments and handling the large uncertainties associated with the motions/behaviors of other robots and/or humans. A key scenario in such environments is the hallway problem, where robots must operate in the same narrow corridor as human traffic going in one or both directions. Traditionally, robot planners have tended to focus on socially acceptable behavior in the hallway scenario at the expense of performance. This paper proposes a planner that aims to address the consequent "robot freezing problem" in hallways by allowing for "peek-and-pass" maneuvers. We then go on to demonstrate in simulation how this planner improves robot time to goal without violating social norms. Finally, we show initial hardware demonstrations of this planner in the real world.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (9)
  1. Y. F. Chen, M. Liu, M. Everett, and J. P. How, “Decentralized non-communicating multiagent collision avoidance with deep reinforcement learning,” in 2017 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA).   IEEE, 2017, pp. 285–292.
  2. X.-T. Truong and T. D. Ngo, “Toward socially aware robot navigation in dynamic and crowded environments: A proactive social motion model,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1743–1760, 2017.
  3. P. T. Singamaneni, A. Favier, and R. Alami, “Human-aware navigation planner for diverse human-robot interaction contexts,” in 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).   IEEE, 2021, pp. 5817–5824.
  4. A. Majumdar and M. Pavone, “How should a robot assess risk? towards an axiomatic theory of risk in robotics,” in Robotics Research: The 18th International Symposium ISRR.   Springer, 2020, pp. 75–84.
  5. Z. Feng, B. Xue, C. Wang, and F. Zhou, “Safe and socially compliant robot navigation in crowds with fast-moving pedestrians via deep reinforcement learning,” Robotica, pp. 1–19, 2024.
  6. A. Francis, C. Pérez-d’Arpino, C. Li, F. Xia, A. Alahi, R. Alami, A. Bera, A. Biswas, J. Biswas, R. Chandra et al., “Principles and guidelines for evaluating social robot navigation algorithms,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.16740, 2023.
  7. S. Poddar, C. Mavrogiannis, and S. S. Srinivasa, “From crowd motion prediction to robot navigation in crowds,” in 2023 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).   IEEE, 2023, pp. 6765–6772.
  8. M. Dharmadhikari, T. Dang, L. Solanka, J. Loje, H. Nguyen, N. Khedekar, and K. Alexis, “Motion primitives-based path planning for fast and agile exploration using aerial robots,” in 2020 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).   IEEE, 2020, pp. 179–185.
  9. E. Leurent, “An environment for autonomous driving decision-making,” https://github.com/eleurent/highway-env, 2018.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.