Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
167 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Looking for the Human in HRI Teaching: User-Centered Course Design for Tech-Savvy Students (2403.12607v1)

Published 19 Mar 2024 in cs.RO and cs.HC

Abstract: Top-down, user-centered thinking is not typically a strength of all students, especially tech-savvy computer science-related ones. We propose Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) introductory courses as a highly suitable opportunity to foster these important skills since the HRI discipline includes a focus on humans as users. Our HRI course therefore contains elements like scenario-based design of laboratory projects, discussing and merging ideas and other self-empowerment techniques. Participants describe, implement and present everyday scenarios using Pepper robots and our customized open-source visual programming tool. We observe that students obtain a good grasp of the taught topics and improve their user-centered thinking skills.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (8)
  1. A. Ostrowski, H. W. Park, and C. Breazeal, “Design Research in HRI: Roboticists, Design Features, and Users as Co-Designers,” in International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, Workshop on Designerly HRI Knowledge, 2020.
  2. R. J. Kirschner, L. Burr, M. Porzenheim, H. Mayer, S. Abdolshah, and S. Haddadin, “Involuntary Motion in Human-Robot Interaction: Effect of Interactive User Training on the Occurrence of Human Startle-Surprise Motion,” in IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Safety for Robotics (ISR), Mar. 2021.
  3. E. Wiese, P. P. Weis, and D. Lofaro, “Embodied social robots trigger gaze following in real-time,” in International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots.   PsyArXiv, Mar. 2018.
  4. H. Erel, Y. Cohen, K. Shafrir, S. D. Levy, I. D. Vidra, T. Shem Tov, and O. Zuckerman, “Excluded by Robots: Can Robot-Robot-Human Interaction Lead to Ostracism?” in ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, Mar. 2021.
  5. H.-L. Cao, C. Scholz, J. De Winter, I. E. Makrini, and B. Vanderborght, “Investigating the Role of Multi-modal Social Cues in Human-Robot Collaboration in Industrial Settings,” International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 1169–1179, Jul. 2023.
  6. R. Andreasson, B. Alenljung, E. Billing, and R. Lowe, “Affective Touch in Human–Robot Interaction: Conveying Emotion to the Nao Robot,” International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 473–491, Sep. 2018.
  7. G. Hoffman and X. Zhao, “A Primer for Conducting Experiments in Human-Robot Interaction,” ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 6:1–6:31, Oct. 2020.
  8. M. Weike, K. Ruske, R. Gerndt, and T. Doernbach, “Enabling Untrained Users to Shape Real-World Robot Behavior Using an Intuitive Visual Programming Tool in Human-Robot Interaction Scenarios,” in International Symposium on Technological Advances in Human-Robot Interaction, 2024, to appear.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets