Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
114 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Premium
26 tokens/sec
GPT-5 Medium
20 tokens/sec
GPT-5 High Premium
20 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
10 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Premium
55 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Molecular dynamics simulation with finite electric fields using Perturbed Neural Network Potentials (2403.12319v1)

Published 18 Mar 2024 in physics.chem-ph

Abstract: The interaction of condensed phase systems with external electric fields is crucial in myriad processes in nature and technology ranging from the field-directed motion of cells (galvanotaxis), to energy storage and conversion systems including supercapacitors, batteries and solar cells. Molecular simulation in the presence of electric fields would give important atomistic insight into these processes but applications of the most accurate methods such as ab-initio molecular dynamics are limited in scope by their computational expense. Here we introduce Perturbed Neural Network Potential Molecular Dynamics (PNNP MD) to push back the accessible time and length scales of such simulations at virtually no loss in accuracy. The total forces on the atoms are expressed in terms of the unperturbed potential energy surface represented by a standard neural network potential and a field-induced perturbation obtained from a series expansion of the field interaction truncated at first order. The latter is represented in terms of an equivariant graph neural network, trained on the atomic polar tensor. PNNP MD is shown to give excellent results for the dielectric relaxation dynamics, the dielectric constant and the field-dependent IR spectrum of liquid water when compared to ab-initio molecular dynamics or experiment, up to surprisingly high field strengths of about 0.2 V/A. This is remarkable because, in contrast to most previous approaches, the two neural networks on which PNNL MD is based are exclusively trained on zero-field molecular configurations demonstrating that the networks not only interpolate but also reliably extrapolate the field response. PNNP MD is based on rigorous theory yet it is simple, general, modular, and systematically improvable allowing us to obtain atomistic insight into the interaction of a wide range of condensed phase systems with external electric fields.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (90)
  1. “Detection and Learning of Floral Electric Fields by Bumblebees” In Science 340, 2013, pp. 66–69 DOI: 10.1126/science.1230883
  2. Zdenek Futera, John S. Tse and Niall J. English “Possibility of realizing superionic ice VII in external electric fields of planetary bodies” In Sci. Adv. 6 American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2020, pp. eaaz2915 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aaz2915
  3. “Fast and Simple Evaluation of the Catalysis and Selectivity Induced by External Electric Fields” In ACS Catal. 11, 2021, pp. 14467–14479 DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.1c04247
  4. “Electric-Field Mediated Chemistry: Uncovering and Exploiting the Potential of (Oriented) Electric Fields to Exert Chemical Catalysis and Reaction Control” In J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142.29 American Chemical Society, 2020, pp. 12551–12562 DOI: 10.1021/jacs.0c05128
  5. M. J. Rycroft, S. Israelsson and C. Price “The global atmospheric electric circuit, solar activity and climate change” In J. Atmos. Sol. Terr. Phys. 62.17, 2000, pp. 1563–1576
  6. “Voltage-dependent ordering of water molecules at an electrode-electrolyte interface” In Nature 368, 1994, pp. 444–446 URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/368444a0
  7. Hongxia Hao, Itai Leven and Teresa Head-Gordon “Can electric fields drive chemistry for an aqueous microdroplet?” In Nat. Commun. 13, 2022, pp. 280
  8. “Electric field induced activation of H2—Can DFT do the job?” In Chem. Commun. 46, 2010, pp. 7942–7944 DOI: 10.1039/C0CC02569K
  9. “Ab initio Description of Bond Breaking in Large Electric Fields” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 2020, pp. 176801 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.176801
  10. Massimiliano Stengel, Nicola A. Spaldin and David Vanderbilt “Electric displacement as the fundamental variable in electronic-structure calculations” In Nat. Phys. 5, 2009, pp. 304–308 URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1185
  11. “Computing the dielectric constant of liquid water at constant dielectric displacement” In Phys. Rev. B 93.14 American Physical Society, 2016, pp. 144201 URL: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.144201
  12. Thomas Sayer, Chao Zhang and Michiel Sprik “Charge compensation at the interface between the polar NaCl(111) surface and a NaCl aqueous solution” In J. Chem. Phys. 147, 2017, pp. 104702 URL: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4987019
  13. Stephen J. Cox and Michiel Sprik “Finite field formalism for bulk electrolyte solutions” In J. Chem. Phys. 151.6, 2019, pp. 064506 DOI: 10.1063/1.5099207
  14. “Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics: Basic Theory and Advanced Methods” Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009
  15. Niall J English and Conor J Waldron “Perspectives on external electric fields in molecular simulation: progress, prospects and challenges” In Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17.19 Royal Society of Chemistry, 2015, pp. 12407–12440
  16. Hossam Elgabarty, Naveen Kumar Kaliannan and Thomas D. Kühne “Enhancement of the local asymmetry in the hydrogen bond network of liquid water by an ultrafast electric field pulse” In Sci. Rep. 9, 2019, pp. 10002 URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46449-5
  17. “Energy transfer within the hydrogen bonding network of water following resonant terahertz excitation” In Sci. Adv. 6.17 American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2020, pp. eaay7074 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aay7074
  18. “Modelling electrochemical systems with finite field molecular dynamics” In JPhys Energy 2.3 IOP Publishing, 2020, pp. 032005
  19. Mei Jia, Chao Zhang and Jun Cheng “Origin of Asymmetric Electric Double Layers at Electrified Oxide/Electrolyte Interfaces” PMID: 33973792 In J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12.19, 2021, pp. 4616–4622 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c00775
  20. “Computing the dielectric constant of liquid water at constant dielectric displacement” In Phys. Rev. B 93 American Physical Society, 2016, pp. 144201 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.144201
  21. Zdenek Futera and Niall J. English “Water Breakup at Fe2O3–Hematite/Water Interfaces: Influence of External Electric Fields from Nonequilibrium Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics” In J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12 American Chemical Society (ACS), 2021, pp. 6818–6826 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c01479
  22. “Comparing Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics and a Semiclassical Grand Canonical Scheme for the Electric Double Layer of the Pt(111)/Water Interface” In J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 14 American Chemical Society, 2023, pp. 2354–2363 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c03892
  23. “Generalized Neural-Network Representation of High-Dimensional Potential-Energy Surfaces” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 American Physical Society, 2007, pp. 146401 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.146401
  24. “Gaussian approximation potentials: The accuracy of quantum mechanics, without the electrons” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 104.13 APS, 2010, pp. 136403
  25. Jorg Behler “Four generations of high-dimensional neural network potentials” In Chem. Rev. 121.16 ACS Publications, 2021, pp. 10037–10072
  26. “Deep neural network for the dielectric response of insulators” In Phys. Rev. B 102 American Physical Society, 2020, pp. 041121 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.102.041121
  27. “Raman spectrum and polarizability of liquid water from deep neural networks” In Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22 The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2020, pp. 10592–10602 DOI: 10.1039/D0CP01893G
  28. Kristof Schütt, Oliver Unke and Michael Gastegger “Equivariant message passing for the prediction of tensorial properties and molecular spectra” In Proc. Mach. Learn. Res., 2021, pp. 9377–9388
  29. “Accurate molecular polarizabilities with coupled cluster theory and machine learning” In Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 116, 2019, pp. 3401–3406 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1816132116
  30. “Inexpensive modeling of quantum dynamics using path integral generalized Langevin equation thermostats” In J. Chem. Phys. 152.12, 2020, pp. 124104 DOI: 10.1063/1.5141950
  31. “Efficient Quantum Vibrational Spectroscopy of Water with High-Order Path Integrals: From Bulk to Interfaces” In J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12.37 American Chemical Society, 2021, pp. 9108–9114 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02574
  32. “Infrared Spectra at Coupled Cluster Accuracy from Neural Network Representations” In J. Chem. Theory Comput. 18.9 American Chemical Society, 2022, pp. 5492–5501 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.2c00511
  33. Philipp Schienbein “Spectroscopy from machine learning by accurately representing the atomic polar tensor” In J. Chem. Theory Comput. 19.3 ACS Publications, 2023, pp. 705–712
  34. Anders S. Christensen, Felix A. Faber and O. Anatole Lilienfeld “Operators in quantum machine learning: Response properties in chemical space” In J. Chem. Phys. 150.6, 2019, pp. 064105 URL: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5053562
  35. Michael Gastegger, Kristof T. Schütt and Klaus-Robert Müller “Machine learning of solvent effects on molecular spectra and reactions” In Chem. Sci. 12 The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2021, pp. 11473–11483 DOI: 10.1039/D1SC02742E
  36. Ang Gao and Richard C. Remsing “Self-consistent determination of long-range electrostatics in neural network potentials” In Nat. Commun. 13, 2022, pp. 1572 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-29243-2
  37. “Finite-field coupling via learning the charge response kernel” In Electron. Struct. 4 IOP Publishing, 2022, pp. 014012 URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2516-1075/ac59ca
  38. “Universal machine learning for the response of atomistic systems to external fields” In Nat. Commun. 14.1, 2023, pp. 6424 URL: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-42148-y
  39. Willis B. Person and James H. Newton “Dipole moment derivatives and infrared intensities. I. Polar tensors” In J. Chem. Phys. 61, 1974, pp. 1040–1049 DOI: 10.1063/1.1681972
  40. Christoph Schran, Krystof Brezina and Ondrej Marsalek “Committee neural network potentials control generalization errors and enable active learning” In J. Chem. Phys. 153, 2020, pp. 104105 DOI: 10.1063/5.0016004
  41. Attila Szabo and Neil S. Ostlund “Modern Quantum Chemistry” Dover Publications, Inc., 1996
  42. R. Resta “Theory of the electric polarization in crystals” In Ferroelectrics 136.1 Taylor & Francis, 1992, pp. 51–55 DOI: 10.1080/00150199208016065
  43. “Theory of polarization: a modern approach” In Physics of ferroelectrics: a modern perspective Springer, pp. 31–68
  44. Suresh Kondati Natarajan and Jörg Behler “Neural network molecular dynamics simulations of solid–liquid interfaces: water at low-index copper surfaces” In Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18.41, 2016, pp. 28704–28725 DOI: 10.1039/c6cp05711j
  45. “Nanosecond solvation dynamics of the hematite/liquid water interface at hybrid DFT accuracy using committee neural network potentials” In Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24, 2022, pp. 15365–15375 DOI: 10.1039/D2CP01708C
  46. “Machine learning potentials for complex aqueous systems made simple” In Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 118.38, 2021, pp. e2110077118 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2110077118
  47. “Asymmetric response of interfacial water to applied electric fields” In Nature 594.7861 Nature Publishing Group UK London, 2021, pp. 62–65
  48. “Nuclear Quantum Effects in Water and Aqueous Systems: Experiment, Theory, and Current Challenges” In Chem. Rev. 116, 2016, pp. 7529–7550 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00674
  49. “A Formulation for the Static Permittivity of Water and Steam at Temperatures from 238 K to 873 K at Pressures up to 1200 MPa, Including Derivatives and Debye-Hückel Coefficients” In J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 26, 1997, pp. 1125–1166 DOI: 10.1063/1.555997
  50. John G Kirkwood “The dielectric polarization of polar liquids” In J. Chem. Phys. 7.10 American Institute of Physics, 1939, pp. 911–919
  51. “On the calculation of the frequency-dependent dielectric constant in computer simulations” In Chem. Phys. Lett. 102.6, 1983, pp. 508–513 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(83)87455-7
  52. “Simulation of electrostatic systems in periodic boundary conditions. I. Lattice sums and dielectric constants” In Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A. 373.1752, 1980, pp. 27–56 DOI: 10.1098/rspa.1980.0135
  53. Deyu Lu, Fran çois Gygi and Giulia Galli “Dielectric Properties of Ice and Liquid Water from First-Principles Calculations” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 American Physical Society, 2008, pp. 147601 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.147601
  54. “How van der Waals interactions determine the unique properties of water” In Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113.30, 2016, pp. 8368–8373 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1602375113
  55. “Computer simulation and the dielectric constant of polarizable polar systems” In Chem. Phys. Lett. 106.6, 1984, pp. 563–569 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(84)85384-1
  56. John E. Bertie and Zhida Lan “Infrared Intensities of Liquids XX: The Intensity of the OH Stretching Band of Liquid Water Revisited, and the Best Current Values of the Optical Constants of \ceH2O(l) at 25 °Ctimes25degreeCelsius25\text{\,}\mathrm{\SIUnitSymbolCelsius}start_ARG 25 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG °C end_ARG between 15 0001500015\,00015 000 and 1 cm−1times1centimeter11\text{\,}{\mathrm{cm}}^{-1}start_ARG 1 end_ARG start_ARG times end_ARG start_ARG power start_ARG roman_cm end_ARG start_ARG - 1 end_ARG end_ARG” In Appl. Spectrosc. 50, 1996, pp. 1047–1057 DOI: 10.1366/0003702963905385
  57. R. Rey, Klaus B Møller and James T. Hynes “Hydrogen Bond Dynamics in Water and Ultrafast Infrared Spectroscopy” In J. Phys. Chem. A 106, 2002, pp. 11993–11996 DOI: 10.1021/jp026419o
  58. C. P. Lawrence and J. L. Skinner “Vibrational spectroscopy of \ceHOD in liquid \ceD2O. III. Spectral diffusion, and hydrogen-bonding and rotational dynamics” In J. Chem. Phys. 118, 2003, pp. 264–272 DOI: 10.1063/1.1525802
  59. “Ultrafast Hydrogen-Bond Dynamics in the Infrared Spectroscopy of Water” In Science 301, 2003, pp. 1698–1702 DOI: 10.1126/science.1087251
  60. “Supercritical Water is not Hydrogen Bonded” In Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59.42, 2020, pp. 18578–18585 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202009640
  61. “Ab initio spectroscopy of water under electric fields” In Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21 The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2019, pp. 21205–21212 DOI: 10.1039/C9CP03101D
  62. John David Jackson “Classical electrodynamics” New York, NY: Wiley, 1999 URL: http://cdsweb.cern.ch/record/490457
  63. Maarten Cools-Ceuppens, Joni Dambre and Toon Verstraelen “Modeling Electronic Response Properties with an Explicit-Electron Machine Learning Potential” In J. Chem. Theory Comput. 18, 2022, pp. 1672–1691 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.1c00978
  64. “Liquid-Vapor Phase Diagram of RPBE-D3 Water: Electronic Properties along the Coexistence Curve and in the Supercritical Phase” In J. Phys. Chem. B 122, 2018, pp. 3318–3329 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b09761
  65. “Assessing the properties of supercritical water in terms of structural dynamics and electronic polarization effects” In Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22, 2020, pp. 10462–10479 DOI: 10.1039/C9CP05610F
  66. Sho Imoto, Harald Forbert and Dominik Marx “Water structure and solvation of osmolytes at high hydrostatic pressure: pure water and TMAO solutions at 10 kbar versus 1 bar” In Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 2015, pp. 24224–24237 DOI: 10.1039/C5CP03069B
  67. “Dispersion Corrected RPBE Studies of Liquid Water” In J. Chem. Phys. 141, 2014, pp. 064501 DOI: 10.1063/1.4892400
  68. “Ab Initio Simulations of Water/Metal Interfaces” In Chem. Rev. 122.12, 2022, pp. 10746–10776 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00679
  69. “Euclidean neural networks: e3nn” Zenodo, 2022 DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.6459381
  70. “PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library” In Adv. Neural. Inf. Process. Syst. 32 Curran Associates, Inc., 2019, pp. 8024–8035 URL: http://papers.neurips.cc/paper/9015-pytorch-an-imperative-style-high-performance-deep-learning-library.pdf
  71. “i-PI 2.0: A universal force engine for advanced molecular simulations” In Comput. Phys. Commun. 236 Elsevier, 2019, pp. 214–223
  72. “Parallel multistream training of high-dimensional neural network potentials” In J. Chem. Theory Comput. 15.5 ACS Publications, 2019, pp. 3075–3092
  73. “CP2K: An electronic structure and molecular dynamics software package - Quickstep: Efficient and accurate electronic structure calculations” In J. Chem. Phys. 152.19, 2020, pp. 194103 DOI: 10.1063/5.0007045
  74. “Quickstep: Fast and accurate density functional calculations using a mixed Gaussian and plane waves approach” In Comput. Phys. Commun. 167.2, 2005, pp. 103–128 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2004.12.014
  75. Miguel A.L. Marques, Micael J.T. Oliveira and Tobias Burnus “Libxc: A Library of Exchange and Correlation Functionals for Density Functional Theory” In Comput. Phys. Commun. 183, 2012, pp. 2272–2281 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2012.05.007
  76. “A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu” In J. Chem. Phys. 132.15, 2010, pp. 154104 DOI: 10.1063/1.3382344
  77. G. Lippert, J. Hutter and M. Parrinello “A Hybrid Gaussian and Plane Wave Density Functional Scheme” In Mol. Phys. 92, 1997, pp. 477–488 DOI: 10.1080/002689797170220
  78. “Gaussian Basis Sets for Accurate Calculations on Molecular Systems in Gas and Condensed Phases” In J. Chem. Phys. 127, 2007, pp. 114105 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2770708
  79. S. Goedecker, M. Teter and J. Hutter “Separable dual-space Gaussian pseudopotentials” In Phys. Rev. B 54 American Physical Society, 1996, pp. 1703–1710 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1703
  80. C. Hartwigsen, S. Goedecker and J. Hutter “Relativistic separable dual-space Gaussian pseudopotentials from H to Rn” In Phys. Rev. B 58 American Physical Society, 1998, pp. 3641–3662 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.3641
  81. “Ab initio Molecular Dynamics in a Finite Homogeneous Electric Field” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 American Physical Society, 2002, pp. 157602 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.157602
  82. Robert M. Pick, Morrel H. Cohen and Richard M. Martin “Microscopic Theory of Force Constants in the Adiabatic Approximation” In Phys. Rev. B 1 American Physical Society, 1970, pp. 910–920 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.1.910
  83. Edward Ditler, Chandan Kumar and Sandra Luber “Analytic calculation and analysis of atomic polar tensors for molecules and materials using the Gaussian and plane waves approach” In The Journal of Chemical Physics 154.10, 2021, pp. 104121 DOI: 10.1063/5.0041056
  84. “A vibrational circular dichroism implementation within a Slater-type-orbital based density functional framework and its application to hexa-and hepta-helicenes” In Theoretical Chemistry Accounts 119 Springer, 2008, pp. 245–263
  85. Oliver T Unke and Markus Meuwly “PhysNet: A neural network for predicting energies, forces, dipole moments, and partial charges” In Journal of chemical theory and computation 15.6 ACS Publications, 2019, pp. 3678–3693
  86. “SpookyNet: Learning force fields with electronic degrees of freedom and nonlocal effects” In Nature communications 12.1 Nature Publishing Group UK London, 2021, pp. 7273
  87. “Charge-Optimized Electrostatic Interaction Atom-Centered Neural Network Algorithm” In Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation ACS Publications, 2024
  88. Giovanni Bussi, Davide Donadio and Michele Parrinello “Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling” In J. Chem. Phys. 126.1 AIP Publishing, 2007
  89. Shuichi Nosé “A unified formulation of the constant temperature molecular dynamics methods” In J. Chem. Phys. 81.1 American Institute of Physics, 1984, pp. 511–519
  90. Shūichi Nosé “A molecular dynamics method for simulations in the canonical ensemble” In Mol. Phys. 52.2 Taylor & Francis, 1984, pp. 255–268
Citations (2)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.