Scenarios for the Transition to AGI (2403.12107v1)
Abstract: We analyze how output and wages behave under different scenarios for technological progress that may culminate in AGI, defined as the ability of AI systems to perform all tasks that humans can perform. We assume that human work can be decomposed into atomistic tasks that differ in their complexity. Advances in technology make ever more complex tasks amenable to automation. The effects on wages depend on a race between automation and capital accumulation. If the distribution of task complexity exhibits a sufficiently thick infinite tail, then there is always enough work for humans, and wages may rise forever. By contrast, if the complexity of tasks that humans can perform is bounded and full automation is reached, then wages collapse. But declines may occur even before if large-scale automation outpaces capital accumulation and makes labor too abundant. Automating productivity growth may lead to broad-based gains in the returns to all factors. By contrast, bottlenecks to growth from irreproducible scarce factors may exacerbate the decline in wages.
- The race between machine and man: Implications of technology for growth, factor shares and employment. American Economic Review, 108(6):1488–1542.
- Tasks, automation, and the rise in US wage inequality. Econometrica, 90(5):1973–2016.
- Artificial intelligence and economic growth. In Agrawal, A., Gans, J., and Goldfarb, A., editors, The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda, pages 237–290. NBER and University of Chicago Press.
- Artificial intelligence and scientific discovery: A model of prioritized search. Working Paper 31558, National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Do as i can, not as i say: Grounding language in robotic affordances.
- Autor, D. (2019). Work of the past, work of the future. AER Papers and Proceedings, 109:1–32.
- The skill content of recent technological change: An empirical exploration. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(4):1279–1333.
- Economic impacts of AI-augmented R&D. arXiv:2212.08198.
- Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies. Oxford University Press.
- Carlsmith, J. (2020). How Much Computational Power Does It Take to Match the Human Brain? Open Philanthropy.
- Davidson, T. (2023). What a compute-centric framework says about AI takeoff speeds. Working Paper.
- GPTs are GPTs: An early look at the labor market impact potential of large language models.
- Explosive growth from ai automation: A review of the arguments.
- How will language modelers like ChatGPT affect occupations and industries? SSRN Working Paper.
- Good, I. J. (1965). Speculations concerning the first ultraintelligent machine. In Alt, F. L. and Rubinoff, M., editors, Advances in Computers, volume 6, pages 31–88. Academic Press.
- Jones, C. I. (1995). R & D-based models of economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, 103(4):759–784.
- Jones, C. I. (2023). The A.I. dilemma: Growth versus existential risk. Working Paper.
- Changes in relative wages, 1963–1987: Supply and demand factors. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(1):35–78.
- Korinek, A. (2023). Language models and cognitive automation for economic research. NBER Working Paper, 30957.
- Preparing for the (non-existent?) future of work. In Justin Bullock et al., editor, forthcoming, Oxford Handbook of AI Governance. Oxford University Press.
- Kruppa, M. (2023). Google DeepMind CEO says some form of AGI possible in a few years.
- Moore, G. E. (1965). Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics Magazine, 38(8).
- Moravec, H. (1988). Mind Children: The Future of Robot and Human Intelligence. Harvard University Press.
- Compute trends across three eras of machine learning. In 2022 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), pages 1–8.
- Time (2024). When might AI outsmart us? it depends who you ask. Time Magazine, page Jan. 19.
- Economic growth under transformative AI. NBER Working Paper.
- Yudkowsky, E. (2013). Intelligence explosion microeconomics. Technical Report 2013-1, Machine Intelligence Research Institute, Berkeley, CA.
- Zeira, J. (1998). Workers, machines, and economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(4):1091–1117.