Gender differences in online communication: A case study of Soccer (2403.11051v1)
Abstract: Social media and digital platforms allow us to express our opinions freely and easily to a vast number of people. In this study, we examine whether there are gender-based differences in how communication happens via Twitter in regard to soccer. Soccer is one of the most popular sports, and therefore, on social media, it engages a diverse audience regardless of their technical knowledge. We collected Twitter data for three months (March-June) for English and Portuguese that contains 9.5 million Tweets related to soccer, and only 18.38% tweets were identified as belonging to women, highlighting a possible gender gap already in the number of people who participated actively in this topic. We then conduct a fine-grained text-level and network-level analysis to identify the gender differences that might exist while communicating on Twitter. Our results show that women express their emotions more intensely than men, regardless of the differences in volume. The network generated from Portuguese has lower homophily than English. However, this difference in homophily does not impact how females express their emotions and sentiments, suggesting that these aspects are inherent norms or characteristics of genders. Our study unveils more gaps through qualitative and quantitative analyses, highlighting the importance of examining and reporting gender gaps in online communication to create a more inclusive space where people can openly share their opinions.
- Exploring the YouTube science communication gender gap: A sentiment analysis. Public Understanding of Science, 28(1): 68–84.
- Homophily and the glass ceiling effect in social networks. In Proceedings of the 2015 conference on innovations in theoretical computer science, 41–50.
- An information-theoretic, all-scales approach to comparing networks. Applied Network Science, 4(1): 1–15.
- Chanis, A. Online accessed on 2-Aug-2022. 17 Reasons why soccer is the most popular sport in the world. https://mastersoccermind.com/17-reasons-why-soccer-is-the-most-popular-sport-in-the-world/.
- Chaplin, T. 2015. Gender and Emotion Expression: A Developmental Contextual Perspective. Emotion review : journal of the International Society for Research on Emotion, 7: 14–21.
- Through a Gender Lens. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference on World Wide Web - WWW '18. ACM Press.
- Evaluation of Twitter data for an emerging crisis: an application to the first wave of COVID-19 in the UK. Scientific Reports, 11(1): 1–13.
- The effects of gender on perceptions of team Twitter feeds. Global Sport Business Journal, 1(1).
- Exploring misogyny across the manosphere in reddit. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on web science, 87–96.
- Gender Asymmetries in Reality and Fiction: The Bechdel Test of Social Media. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 8(1): 131–140.
- Genderize.io. [Online accessed on 2-Aug-2022]. https://genderize.io/.
- Gender differences in the climate change communication on Twitter. Internet research.
- VADER: A Parsimonious Rule-Based Model for Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Text. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 8(1): 216–225.
- On the inadequacy of nominal assortativity for assessing homophily in networks. Scientific Reports, 13(1): 21053.
- Identification of influential spreaders in complex networks. Nature physics, 6(11): 888–893.
- Lange, D. 2020. Soccer fans by gender 2019.
- Mapping Twitter hate speech towards social and sexual minorities: a lexicon-based approach to semantic content analysis. Behaviour & Information Technology, 39(7): 711–721.
- Women, gender and think tanks: political influence network in Twitter 2018.
- Using sentiment analysis to predict opinion inversion in Tweets of political communication. Scientific Reports, 11.
- Gender differences in participation and reward on Stack Overflow. Empirical Software Engineering, 24(4): 1997–2019.
- White, man, and highly followed: Gender and race inequalities in Twitter. In Proceedings of the international conference on web intelligence, 266–274.
- Mohammad, S. M. 2018. Word Affect Intensities. In Proceedings of the 11th Edition of the Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC-2018). Miyazaki, Japan.
- namepedia.org. [Online accessed on 2020-11-11]. http://www.namepedia.org/.
- Twitter’s glass ceiling: The effect of perceived gender on online visibility. In Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, volume 10, 289–298.
- Oxford University Press, A. 2015. Word of the Year 2015. https://languages.oup.com/word-of-the-year/2015/. [Online accessed on 2-Aug-2022].
- Semantic Journeys: Quantifying Change in Emoji Meaning from 2012-2018.
- Black or White but never neutral: How readers perceive identity from yellow or skin-toned emoji.
- Identity Signals in Emoji Do not Influence Perception of Factual Truth on Twitter.
- Evolving models for meso-scale structures. In 2016 8th international conference on communication systems and networks (COMSNETS), 1–8. IEEE.
- Introduction to sentiment analysis covering basics, tools, evaluation metrics, challenges, and applications. Principles of social networking: the new horizon and emerging challenges, 249–277.
- Recent developments in sentiment analysis on social networks: Techniques, datasets, and open issues. Principles of Social Networking: The New Horizon and Emerging Challenges, 279–306.
- Schischlik, A. 2023. Women and football: #ChangeTheGame - towards gender equality in sports. Online accessed on 14-01-2023.
- Emot API. https://pypi.org/project/emot/. [Online; accessed 2-Aug-2022].
- Algorithmic glass ceiling in social networks: The effects of social recommendations on network diversity. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference, 923–932.
- Tweet topics and sentiments relating to distance learning among Italian Twitter users. Scientific Reports, 12.
- Male or female gender‐polarized YouTube videos are less viewed. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72.
- She’s Reddit: A source of statistically significant gendered interest information? Information processing & management, 56(4): 1543–1558.
- From Louvain to Leiden: guaranteeing well-connected communities. Scientific reports, 9(1): 5233.
- Twitter. [Online accessed on 18-July-2022]. How to use hashtags. https://help.twitter.com/en/using-twitter/how-to-use-hashtags.
- It’s a Man’s Wikipedia? Assessing Gender Inequality in an Online Encyclopedia.
- The value of Twitter for sports fans. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice, 16(1): 36–50.
- Twitter Topic Modeling for Breaking News Detection. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies - Volume 2: WEBIST,, 211–218. INSTICC, SciTePress. ISBN 978-989-758-186-1.
- Gender Effects on Sport Twitter Consumption: Differences in Motivations and Constraints. Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (1947-2900), 6(3).
- Mariana Macedo (11 papers)
- Akrati Saxena (28 papers)