Reconstructing Blood Flow in Data-Poor Regimes: A Vasculature Network Kernel for Gaussian Process Regression (2403.09758v1)
Abstract: Blood flow reconstruction in the vasculature is important for many clinical applications. However, in clinical settings, the available data are often quite limited. For instance, Transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) is a noninvasive clinical tool that is commonly used in the clinical settings to measure blood velocity waveform at several locations on brain's vasculature. This amount of data is grossly insufficient for training machine learning surrogate models, such as deep neural networks or Gaussian process regression. In this work, we propose a Gaussian process regression approach based on physics-informed kernels, enabling near-real-time reconstruction of blood flow in data-poor regimes. We introduce a novel methodology to reconstruct the kernel within the vascular network, which is a non-Euclidean space. The proposed kernel encodes both spatiotemporal and vessel-to-vessel correlations, thus enabling blood flow reconstruction in vessels that lack direct measurements. We demonstrate that any prediction made with the proposed kernel satisfies the conservation of mass principle. The kernel is constructed by running stochastic one-dimensional blood flow simulations, where the stochasticity captures the epistemic uncertainties, such as lack of knowledge about boundary conditions and uncertainties in vasculature geometries. We demonstrate the performance of the model on three test cases, namely, a simple Y-shaped bifurcation, abdominal aorta, and the Circle of Willis in the brain.
- K. Ruedinger, S. Schafer, M. Speidel, and C. Strother, “4d-dsa: development and current neurovascular applications,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 214–220, 2021.
- A. Deshpande, N. Jamilpour, B. Jiang, P. Michel, A. Eskandari, C. Kidwell, M. Wintermark, and K. Laksari, “Automatic segmentation, feature extraction and comparison of healthy and stroke cerebral vasculature,” NeuroImage: Clinical, vol. 30, p. 102573, 2021.
- A. Deshpande, J. Elliott, N. Kari, B. Jiang, P. Michel, N. Toosizadeh, P. T. Fahadan, C. Kidwell, M. Wintermark, and K. Laksari, “Novel imaging markers for altered cerebrovascular morphology in aging, stroke, and alzheimer’s disease,” Journal of Neuroimaging, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 956–967, 2022.
- A. Updegrove, N. M. Wilson, J. Merkow, H. Lan, A. L. Marsden, and S. C. Shadden, “Simvascular: an open source pipeline for cardiovascular simulation,” Annals of biomedical engineering, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 525–541, 2017.
- J. S. Milner, J. A. Moore, B. K. Rutt, and D. A. Steinman, “Hemodynamics of human carotid artery bifurcations: computational studies with models reconstructed from magnetic resonance imaging of normal subjects,” Journal of vascular surgery, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 143–156, 1998.
- J. Moore, D. Steinman, D. Holdsworth, and C. Ethier, “Accuracy of computational hemodynamics in complex arterial geometries reconstructed from magnetic resonance imaging,” Annals of biomedical engineering, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 32–41, 1999.
- M. MacRaild, A. Sarrami-Foroushani, T. Lassila, and A. F. Frangi, “Accelerated simulation methodologies for computational vascular flow modelling,” Journal of the Royal Society Interface, vol. 21, no. 211, p. 20230565, 2024.
- N. Stergiopulos, D. Young, and T. Rogge, “Computer simulation of arterial flow with applications to arterial and aortic stenoses,” Journal of biomechanics, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 1477–1488, 1992.
- N. Westerhof, J.-W. Lankhaar, and B. E. Westerhof, “The arterial windkessel,” Medical & biological engineering & computing, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 131–141, 2009.
- B.-W. Lin, “Characteristic outflow boundary conditions for simulations of one-dimensional hemodynamics,” 2016.
- N. M. Pahlevan, F. Amlani, M. H. Gorji, F. Hussain, and M. Gharib, “A physiologically relevant, simple outflow boundary model for truncated vasculature,” Annals of biomedical engineering, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1470–1481, 2011.
- C. A. Taylor, T. A. Fonte, and J. K. Min, “Computational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve: scientific basis,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 61, no. 22, pp. 2233–2241, 2013.
- M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G. E. Karniadakis, “Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 378, pp. 686–707, 2019.
- G. Kissas, Y. Yang, E. Hwuang, W. R. Witschey, J. A. Detre, and P. Perdikaris, “Machine learning in cardiovascular flows modeling: Predicting arterial blood pressure from non-invasive 4d flow mri data using physics-informed neural networks,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 358, p. 112623, 2020.
- M. Sarabian, H. Babaee, and K. Laksari, “Physics-informed neural networks for brain hemodynamic predictions using medical imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2022.
- A. Arzani, J.-X. Wang, and R. M. D’Souza, “Uncovering near-wall blood flow from sparse data with physics-informed neural networks,” Physics of Fluids, vol. 33, no. 7, p. 071905, 2021.
- M. Raissi, A. Yazdani, and G. E. Karniadakis, “Hidden fluid mechanics: Learning velocity and pressure fields from flow visualizations,” Science, vol. 367, no. 6481, pp. 1026–1030, 2020.
- L. García-Terriza, J. L. Risco-Martín, G. R. Roselló, and J. L. Ayala, “Predictive and diagnosis models of stroke from hemodynamic signal monitoring,” Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 1325–1337, 2021.
- Springer, 2006.
- P. Perdikaris and G. E. Karniadakis, “Model inversion via multi-fidelity bayesian optimization: a new paradigm for parameter estimation in haemodynamics, and beyond,” Journal of The Royal Society Interface, vol. 13, no. 118, 2016.
- John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
- X. Meng, H. Babaee, and G. E. Karniadakis, “Multi-fidelity bayesian neural networks: Algorithms and applications,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 438, p. 110361, 2021.
- F. S. Costabal, K. Matsuno, J. Yao, P. Perdikaris, and E. Kuhl, “Machine learning in drug development: Characterizing the effect of 30 drugs on the qt interval using gaussian process regression, sensitivity analysis, and uncertainty quantification,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 348, pp. 313–333, 2019.
- H. Babaee, C. Bastidas, M. DeFilippo, C. Chryssostomidis, and G. Karniadakis, “A multi-fidelity framework and uncertainty quantification for sea surface temperature in the massachusetts and cape cod bays,” Earth and Space Science, p. e458, 2018.
- C. M. Fleeter, G. Geraci, D. E. Schiavazzi, A. M. Kahn, and A. L. Marsden, “Multilevel and multifidelity uncertainty quantification for cardiovascular hemodynamics,” Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, vol. 365, p. 113030, 2020.
- H. Babaee, P. Perdikaris, C. Chryssostomidis, and G. Karniadakis, “Multi-fidelity modelling of mixed convection based on experimental correlations and numerical simulations,” Journal of Fluid Mechanics, vol. 809, pp. 895–917, 2016.
- M. Raissi, H. Babaee, and G. E. Karniadakis, “Parametric gaussian process regression for big data,” Computational Mechanics, vol. 64, pp. 409–416, 2019.
- G. Pang, L. Yang, and G. E. Karniadakis, “Neural-net-induced gaussian process regression for function approximation and pde solution,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 384, pp. 270–288, 2019.
- Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
- C. Williams, “Computing with infinite networks,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 9, 1996.
- J. Lee, Y. Bahri, R. Novak, S. S. Schoenholz, J. Pennington, and J. Sohl-Dickstein, “Deep neural networks as gaussian processes,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.00165, 2017.
- X. Yang, D. Barajas-Solano, G. Tartakovsky, and A. M. Tartakovsky, “Physics-informed cokriging: A gaussian-process-regression-based multifidelity method for data-model convergence,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 395, pp. 410–431, 2019.
- X. Yang, G. Tartakovsky, and A. M. Tartakovsky, “Physics information aided kriging using stochastic simulation models,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. A3862–A3891, 2021.
- H. Owhadi and G. R. Yoo, “Kernel flows: From learning kernels from data into the abyss,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 389, pp. 22–47, 2019.
- P. Perdikaris, M. Raissi, A. Damianou, N. D. Lawrence, and G. E. Karniadakis, “Nonlinear information fusion algorithms for data-efficient multi-fidelity modelling,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 473, no. 2198, p. 20160751, 2017.
- M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G. E. Karniadakis, “Inferring solutions of differential equations using noisy multi-fidelity data,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 335, pp. 736–746, 2017.
- M. Raissi and G. Karniadakis, “Deep multi-fidelity gaussian processes,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1604.07484, 2016.
- D. Ye, P. Zun, V. Krzhizhanovskaya, and A. G. Hoekstra, “Uncertainty quantification of a three-dimensional in-stent restenosis model with surrogate modelling,” Journal of the Royal Society Interface, vol. 19, no. 187, p. 20210864, 2022.
- L. M. Paun and D. Husmeier, “Markov chain monte carlo with gaussian processes for fast parameter estimation and uncertainty quantification in a 1d fluid-dynamics model of the pulmonary circulation,” International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, vol. 37, no. 2, p. e3421, 2021.
- H. N. Do, A. Ijaz, H. Gharahi, B. Zambrano, J. Choi, W. Lee, and S. Baek, “Prediction of abdominal aortic aneurysm growth using dynamical gaussian process implicit surface,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 609–622, 2018.
- L. Trefethen, “Householder triangularization of a quasimatrix,” IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 887–897, 2010.
- M. Donello, G. Palkar, M. Naderi, D. Del Rey Fernández, and H. Babaee, “Oblique projection for scalable rank-adaptive reduced-order modelling of nonlinear stochastic partial differential equations with time-dependent bases,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A, vol. 479, no. 2278, p. 20230320, 2023.
- J. Alastruey, S. Moore, K. Parker, T. David, J. Peiró, and S. Sherwin, “Reduced modelling of blood flow in the cerebral circulation: coupling 1-d, 0-d and cerebral auto-regulation models,” International journal for numerical methods in fluids, vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 1061–1067, 2008.
- S. Sherwin and G. E. Karniadakis, “Spectral/hp element methods for cfd,” 1999.
- S. Maier, D. Meier, P. Boesiger, U. Moser, and A. Vieli, “Human abdominal aorta: comparative measurements of blood flow with mr imaging and multigated doppler us.,” Radiology, vol. 171, no. 2, pp. 487–492, 1989.
- J. Bock, B. Kreher, J. Hennig, and M. Markl, “Optimized pre-processing of time-resolved 2d and 3d phase contrast mri data,” in Proceedings of the 15th Annual meeting of ISMRM, Berlin, Germany, vol. 3138, 2007.
- S. Sherwin, V. Franke, J. Peiró, and K. Parker, “One-dimensional modelling of a vascular network in space-time variables,” Journal of engineering mathematics, vol. 47, no. 3-4, pp. 217–250, 2003.