Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
126 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Geometric Approach to Resilient Distributed Consensus Accounting for State Imprecision and Adversarial Agents (2403.09009v1)

Published 14 Mar 2024 in eess.SY and cs.SY

Abstract: This paper presents a novel approach for resilient distributed consensus in multiagent networks when dealing with adversarial agents imprecision in states observed by normal agents. Traditional resilient distributed consensus algorithms often presume that agents have exact knowledge of their neighbors' states, which is unrealistic in practical scenarios. We show that such existing methods are inadequate when agents only have access to imprecise states of their neighbors. To overcome this challenge, we adapt a geometric approach and model an agent's state by an `imprecision region' rather than a point in $\mathbb{R}d$. From a given set of imprecision regions, we first present an efficient way to compute a region that is guaranteed to lie in the convex hull of true, albeit unknown, states of agents. We call this region the \emph{invariant hull} of imprecision regions and provide its geometric characterization. Next, we use these invariant hulls to identify a \emph{safe point} for each normal agent. The safe point of an agent lies within the convex hull of its \emph{normal} neighbors' states and hence is used by the agent to update it's state. This leads to the aggregation of normal agents' states to safe points inside the convex hull of their initial states, or an approximation of consensus. We also illustrate our results through simulations. Our contributions enhance the robustness of resilient distributed consensus algorithms by accommodating state imprecision without compromising resilience against adversarial agents.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (27)
  1. H. Ishii, Y. Wang, and S. Feng, “An overview on multi-agent consensus under adversarial attacks,” Annual Reviews in Control, vol. 53, pp. 252–272, 2022.
  2. M. Pirani, A. Mitra, and S. Sundaram, “Graph-theoretic approaches for analyzing the resilience of distributed control systems: A tutorial and survey,” Automatica, vol. 157, p. 111264, 2023.
  3. H. Park and S. A. Hutchinson, “Fault-tolerant rendezvous of multirobot systems,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 565–582, 2017.
  4. W. Abbas, M. Shabbir, J. Li, and X. Koutsoukos, “Resilient distributed vector consensus using centerpoint,” Automatica, vol. 136, p. 110046, 2022.
  5. H. J. LeBlanc, H. Zhang, X. Koutsoukos, and S. Sundaram, “Resilient asymptotic consensus in robust networks,” IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 766–781, 2013.
  6. L. Su and N. Vaidya, “Multi-agent optimization in the presence of byzantine adversaries: Fundamental limits,” in American Control Conference (ACC), 2016, pp. 7183–7188.
  7. H. Mendes, M. Herlihy, N. Vaidya, and V. K. Garg, “Multidimensional agreement in byzantine systems,” Distributed Computing, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 423–441, 2015.
  8. J. Yan, X. Li, Y. Mo, and C. Wen, “Resilient multi-dimensional consensus in adversarial environment,” Automatica, vol. 145, p. 110530, 2022.
  9. J. Yan, Y. Mo, X. Li, and C. Wen, “A “safe kernel” approach for resilient multi-dimensional consensus,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 2507–2512, 2020.
  10. Y. Wang, H. Ishii, F. Bonnet, and X. Défago, “Resilient consensus for multi-agent systems under adversarial spreading processes,” IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 3316–3331, 2022.
  11. J. Li, W. Abbas, and X. Koutsoukos, “Resilient distributed diffusion in networks with adversaries,” IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks, vol. 6, pp. 1–17, 2019.
  12. Z. Yang and W. U. Bajwa, “Byrdie: Byzantine-resilient distributed coordinate descent for decentralized learning,” IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 611–627, 2019.
  13. L. Su and N. H. Vaidya, “Byzantine-resilient multiagent optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 2227–2233, 2020.
  14. J. Zhu, Y. Lin, A. Velasquez, and J. Liu, “Resilient distributed optimization,” in American Control Conference (ACC), 2023, pp. 1307–1312.
  15. K. Kuwaranancharoen, L. Xin, and S. Sundaram, “Byzantine-resilient distributed optimization of multi-dimensional functions,” in American Control Conference (ACC), 2020, pp. 4399–4404.
  16. J. Usevitch and D. Panagou, “Resilient leader-follower consensus to arbitrary reference values in time-varying graphs,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 1755–1762, 2019.
  17. M. Safi, S. M. Dibaji, and M. Pirani, “Resilient coordinated movement of connected autonomous vehicles,” European Journal of Control, vol. 64, p. 100613, 2022.
  18. S. M. Dibaji and H. Ishii, “Resilient consensus of second-order agent networks: Asynchronous update rules with delays,” Automatica, vol. 81, pp. 123–132, 2017.
  19. D. Jayasimha, “Fault tolerance in a multisensor environment,” in Proceedings of IEEE Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems, 1994, pp. 2–11.
  20. E. F. Nakamura, A. A. Loureiro, and A. C. Frery, “Information fusion for wireless sensor networks: Methods, models, and classifications,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 9–es, 2007.
  21. J. Park, R. Ivanov, J. Weimer, M. Pajic, S. H. Son, and I. Lee, “Security of cyber-physical systems in the presence of transient sensor faults,” ACM Transactions on Cyber-Physical Systems, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 1–23, 2017.
  22. G. Frehse, A. Hamann, S. Quinton, and M. Woehrle, “Formal analysis of timing effects on closed-loop properties of control software,” in IEEE Real-Time Systems Symposium, 2014, pp. 53–62.
  23. T. Nagai, S. Yasutome, and N. Tokura, “Convex hull problem with imprecise input,” in Discrete and Computational Geometry.   Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2000, pp. 207–219.
  24. J. Li, W. Abbas, M. Shabbir, and X. Koutsoukos, “Byzantine resilient distributed learning in multirobot systems,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 3550–3563, 2022.
  25. I. Bárány, “A generalization of carathéodory’s theorem,” Discrete Mathematics, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 141–152, 1982.
  26. M. Abrahamsen and B. Walczak, “Common tangents of two disjoint polygons in linear time and constant workspace,” ACM Trans. Algorithms, vol. 15, no. 1, dec 2018.
  27. S. Ray and N. Mustafa, “An optimal generalization of the centerpoint theorem, and its extensions,” in Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry, 2007, pp. 138–141.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.