Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
110 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

DrivAerNet: A Parametric Car Dataset for Data-Driven Aerodynamic Design and Graph-Based Drag Prediction (2403.08055v1)

Published 12 Mar 2024 in cs.LG, physics.flu-dyn, and cs.CE

Abstract: This study introduces DrivAerNet, a large-scale high-fidelity CFD dataset of 3D industry-standard car shapes, and RegDGCNN, a dynamic graph convolutional neural network model, both aimed at aerodynamic car design through machine learning. DrivAerNet, with its 4000 detailed 3D car meshes using 0.5 million surface mesh faces and comprehensive aerodynamic performance data comprising of full 3D pressure, velocity fields, and wall-shear stresses, addresses the critical need for extensive datasets to train deep learning models in engineering applications. It is 60\% larger than the previously available largest public dataset of cars, and is the only open-source dataset that also models wheels and underbody. RegDGCNN leverages this large-scale dataset to provide high-precision drag estimates directly from 3D meshes, bypassing traditional limitations such as the need for 2D image rendering or Signed Distance Fields (SDF). By enabling fast drag estimation in seconds, RegDGCNN facilitates rapid aerodynamic assessments, offering a substantial leap towards integrating data-driven methods in automotive design. Together, DrivAerNet and RegDGCNN promise to accelerate the car design process and contribute to the development of more efficient vehicles. To lay the groundwork for future innovations in the field, the dataset and code used in our study are publicly accessible at \url{https://github.com/Mohamedelrefaie/DrivAerNet}

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (43)
  1. Geometrical deep learning for performance prediction of high-speed craft. Ocean Engineering, 258:111716, 2022.
  2. Some salient features of the time -averaged ground vehicle wake. SAE Transactions, 93:473–503, 1984.
  3. Drag-guided diffusion models for vehicle image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.09935, 6 2023.
  4. Summary of the 4th high-lift prediction workshop hybrid rans/les technology focus group. Journal of Aircraft, pages 1–30, 2023.
  5. N. Ashton and W. van Noordt. Overview and summary of the first automotive cfd prediction workshop: Drivaer model. SAE International Journal of Commercial Vehicles, 16(02-16-01-0005), 2022.
  6. Evaluation of cfd methodologies for prediction of flows around simplified and complex automotive models. Computers & Fluids, 236:105297, 2022.
  7. Geodesic convolutional shape optimization. In J. Dy and A. Krause, editors, Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 80 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 472–481. PMLR, 10–15 Jul 2018.
  8. Airfrans: High fidelity computational fluid dynamics dataset for approximating reynolds-averaged navier–stokes solutions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:23463–23478, 2022.
  9. Road to zero or road to nowhere? disrupting transport and energy in a zero carbon world. Energy Policy, 139:111334, 2020.
  10. Shapenet: An information-rich 3d model repository. arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.03012, 2015.
  11. A. Cogotti. A parametric study on the ground effect of a simplified car model. SAE transactions, pages 180–204, 1998.
  12. Numerical studies of space-filling designs: optimization of latin hypercube samples and subprojection properties. Journal of Simulation, 7(4):276–289, 2013.
  13. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 248–255. Ieee, 2009.
  14. Surrogate modeling of the aerodynamic performance for airfoils in transonic regime. In AIAA SCITECH 2024 Forum, page 2220, 2024.
  15. Real-time and on-site aerodynamics using stereoscopic piv and deep optical flow learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.09932, 2024.
  16. A generative design and drag coefficient prediction system for sedan car side silhouettes based on computational fluid dynamics. CAD Computer Aided Design, 111:65–79, 6 2019.
  17. Experimental and numerical investigation of the drivaer model. In Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting, volume 44755, pages 41–51. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2012.
  18. Introduction of a new realistic generic car model for aerodynamic investigations. Technical report, SAE Technical Paper, 2012.
  19. Deep learning for real-time aerodynamic evaluations of arbitrary vehicle shapes. SAE International Journal of Passenger Vehicle Systems, 15(2):77–90, mar 2022.
  20. A. Kashefi and T. Mukerji. Physics-informed pointnet: A deep learning solver for steady-state incompressible flows and thermal fields on multiple sets of irregular geometries. Journal of Computational Physics, 468:111510, 2022.
  21. D. P. Kingma and J. Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014.
  22. Geometry-informed neural operator for large-scale 3d pdes, 2023.
  23. Assessing policy interventions to stimulate the transition of electric vehicle technology in the european union. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 87:101505, 2023.
  24. Ten years of industrial experience with the sst turbulence model. Turbulence, heat and mass transfer, 4(1):625–632, 2003.
  25. P. Mock and S. Díaz. Pathways to decarbonization: the european passenger car market in the years 2021–2035. communications, 49:847129–848102, 2021.
  26. Learning mesh-based simulation with graph networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.03409, 2020.
  27. Pointnet: Deep learning on point sets for 3d classification and segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 652–660, 2017.
  28. Meshsdf: Differentiable iso-surface extraction. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:22468–22478, 2020.
  29. On the efficiency of a point cloud autoencoder as a geometric representation for shape optimization. pages 791–798. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 12 2019.
  30. Point2ffd: Learning shape representations of simulation-ready 3d models for engineering design optimization. pages 1024–1033. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2021.
  31. Exploiting local geometric features in vehicle design optimization with 3d point cloud autoencoders. In 2021 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pages 514–521, 2021.
  32. Scalability of learning tasks on 3d cae models using point cloud autoencoders. pages 1367–1374. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 12 2019.
  33. Multi-fidelity data fusion through parameter space reduction with applications to automotive engineering. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 124(23):5293–5311, 2023.
  34. Learning to simulate complex physics with graph networks. In International conference on machine learning, pages 8459–8468. PMLR, 2020.
  35. Application of multi-fidelity transfer learning with autoencoders for efficient construction of surrogate models. In AIAA SCITECH 2024 Forum, page 0013, 2024.
  36. Surrogate modeling of car drag coefficient with depth and normal renderings. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.06110, 2023.
  37. D. B. Spalding. The numerical computation of turbulent flow. Comp. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 3:269, 1974.
  38. Deep learning methods for reynolds-averaged navier–stokes simulations of airfoil flows. AIAA Journal, 58(1):25–36, 2020.
  39. 3d super-resolution model for vehicle flow field enrichment. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, pages 5826–5835, 2024.
  40. N. Umetani and B. Bickel. Learning three-dimensional flow for interactive aerodynamic design. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 37, 2018.
  41. A data-driven interactive system for aerodynamic and user-centred generative vehicle design. In 2021 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ICAI), pages 119–127, 2021.
  42. Dynamic graph cnn for learning on point clouds. ACM Transactions on Graphics (tog), 38(5):1–12, 2019.
  43. Experimental comparison of the aerodynamic behavior of fastback and notchback drivaer models. SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars-Mechanical Systems, 7(2014-01-0613):682–691, 2014.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Mohamed Elrefaie (5 papers)
  2. Angela Dai (84 papers)
  3. Faez Ahmed (66 papers)
Citations (4)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets