Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
139 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
47 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Unsupervised self-organising map of prostate cell Raman spectra shows disease-state subclustering (2403.07960v1)

Published 12 Mar 2024 in q-bio.QM and cs.LG

Abstract: Prostate cancer is a disease which poses an interesting clinical question: should it be treated? A small subset of prostate cancers are aggressive and require removal and treatment to prevent metastatic spread. However, conventional diagnostics remain challenged to risk-stratify such patients, hence, new methods of approach to biomolecularly subclassify the disease are needed. Here we use an unsupervised, self-organising map approach to analyse live-cell Raman spectroscopy data obtained from prostate cell-lines; our aim is to test the feasibility of this method to differentiate, at the single-cell-level, cancer from normal using high-dimensional datasets with minimal preprocessing. The results demonstrate not only successful separation of normal prostate and cancer cells, but also a new subclustering of the prostate cancer cell-line into two groups. Initial analysis of the spectra from each of the cancer subclusters demonstrates a differential expression of lipids, which, against the normal control, may be linked to disease-related changes in cellular signalling.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (31)
  1. Raman spectroscopy in biomedicine - non-invasive in vitro analysis of cells and extracellular matrix components in tissues. Biotechnol. J., 8(3):288–297, 2013.
  2. Raman Spectroscopy of Bological Tissues. Applied Spectroscopy Reviews, 42(5):493–541, 2007.
  3. Raman and coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering microscopy studies of changes in lipid content and composition in hormone-treated breast and prostate cancer cells. J. Biomed. Opt., 19(11):111605, 2014.
  4. Teuvo Kohonen. Construction of similarity diagrams for phonemes by a self-organizing algorithm. Teknillinen korkeakoulu, 1981.
  5. Teuvo Kohonen. Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biol. Cybern., 43(1):59–69, 1982.
  6. Recent progresses in machine learning assisted Raman spectroscopy. Adv. Opt. Mater., 11(14), 2023.
  7. Mapping of Redox State of Mitochondrial Cytochromes in Live Cardiomyocytes Using Raman Microspectroscopy. PLOS One, 7(9):e41990, 2012.
  8. Development of the self optimising Kohonen index network (SKiNET) for Raman spectroscopy based detection of anatomical eye tissue. Sci. Rep., 9(1):10812, 2019.
  9. Raman spectroscopy and advanced mathematical modelling in the discrimination of human thyroid cell lines. Head Neck Oncol., 1:38, 2009.
  10. Exploring the maturation of a monocytic cell line using self-organizing maps of single-cell Raman spectra. Biointerphases, 15(4):041010, 2020.
  11. Prostate Cancer UK. About prostate cancer. prostatecanceruk.org/prostate-information/about-prostate-cancer, accessed March 6, 2024.
  12. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol., 40(2):244–252, 2016.
  13. Functional expression of sv40 in normal human prostatic epithelial and fibroblastic cells - differentiation pattern of nontumorigenic cell-lines. Int. J. Oncol., 6(2):333–343, 1995.
  14. The LNCaP cell line–a new model for studies on human prostatic carcinoma. Prog. Clin. Biol. Res., 37:115–132, 1980.
  15. Charles Kershaw. Raman Spectroscopy Studies of Prostate Cancer and Streptomyces Bacteria. Masters by Research thesis, University of York, 2017.
  16. Marcus Cameron. Biomolecular stratification of standard prostate cell lines and primary prostate cell cultures using confocal Raman spectroscopy. PhD thesis, University of York, 2021.
  17. Raman spectroscopy and regenerative medicine: a review. NPJ Regen Med, 2:12, 2017.
  18. Introductory Raman Spectroscopy. Academic Press, 2002.
  19. Biomolecular phenotyping and heterogeneity assessment of mesenchymal stromal cells using label-free Raman spectroscopy. Sci. Rep., 11(1):4385, 2021.
  20. Teuvo Kohonen. The Self-Organizing Map. Proc. IEEE, 78(9):1464–1480, 1990.
  21. Teuvo Kohonen. Self-Organizing Maps. Springer, 3rd edition, 2001.
  22. Teuvo Kohonen. Essentials of the self-organizing map. Neural Netw., 37:52–65, 2013.
  23. J Vesanto and E Alhoniemi. Clustering of the Self-Organizing Map. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., 11(3):586–600, 2000.
  24. Self-organizing maps: ordering, convergence properties and energy functions. Biol. Cybern., 67(1):47–55, 1992.
  25. R Ponmalai and C Kamath. Self-Organizing Maps and Their Applications to Data Analysis. Technical Report LLNL-TR-791165, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 2019.
  26. Giuseppe Vettigli. MiniSom. https://github.com/JustGlowing/minisom, 2013. (accessed March 10, 2020).
  27. Li Yuan. Implementation of Self-Organizing maps with python. Master’s thesis, University of Rhode Island, 2018.
  28. Daniel West. Using self-organising maps to cluster complex biological data. Masters by Research thesis, University of York, 2021.
  29. Raman Spectroscopy of Biological Tissues. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev., 50(1):46–111, 2015.
  30. Lipid signalling in disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 9(2):162–176, 2008.
  31. Obesity and prostate cancer - microenvironmental roles of adipose tissue. Nat. Rev. Urol., 20(10):579–596, 2023.

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that unsupervised self-organising maps effectively distinguish between normal and cancerous prostate cells while identifying novel subclusters.
  • It employs Raman spectroscopy to capture precise molecular fingerprints, highlighting subtle lipid expression differences in prostate cancer cells.
  • The study suggests that this innovative approach could enhance prostate cancer stratification and support the development of targeted treatment strategies.

Unveiling New Subclustering in Prostate Cancer Cells through Raman Spectra Analysis with Self-Organising Maps

Introduction to the Study

In the ongoing paper of prostate cancer, a condition marked by its clinical dilemma on whether to treat it due to its variable aggressiveness, the necessity for innovative methods to subclassify the disease biomolecularly has never been more critical. Traditional diagnostic tools struggle to stratify patients accurately according to their disease's aggressiveness. However, a recent application of an unsupervised, self-organising map (SOM) to analyse live-cell Raman spectroscopy data from prostate cell-lines emerges as a promising approach. This paper aimed to explore the capability of SOMs in differentiating cancerous from normal cells and potentially identifying novel subclusters within prostate cancer cells, based on minimal preprocessing high-dimensional datasets.

Methodology: A Deep Dive into Raman Spectroscopy and SOMs

The paper leverages Raman spectroscopy, a technique known for its non-destructive, label-free analysis which provides a molecular "fingerprint" of cells. This approach is particularly suitable for detecting early genetic changes in cells that could signal the onset of cancer. The challenges of handling high-dimensionality data from Raman spectroscopy are acknowledged, pointing towards the necessity for sophisticated computational techniques like SOMs.

Self-organising maps, introduced by Kohonen in the 1980s, offer an unsupervised learning method that organises high-dimensional input data into a two-dimensional array based on shared statistics. This method is noted for its potential in uncovering sub-classifications within datasets, a feature that could prove particularly useful in the complex field of cancer research. The paper provides a meticulous overview of SOM parameters, highlighting the prerequisites for optimising the model to interpret Raman spectroscopy data effectively.

Results: Unveiling the Subclustering

The paper reports on the successful use of SOMs to not only distinguish between normal and cancerous prostate cells but also to reveal a previously unidentified subclustering within the prostate cancer cell line. The analysis indicates differential expression of lipids between the two cancer subclusters, suggesting possible links to disease-related changes in cellular signalling. This finding opens avenues for further exploration into the biological significance of these spectral differences and their implications for understanding prostate cancer's heterogeneity.

Implications and Future Directions

The paper's outcomes underscore the importance of unsupervised learning techniques in biomedical research, particularly for diseases as complex and variable as prostate cancer. The ability of SOMs to classify and sub-stratify high-dimensional data without extensive preprocessing marks a significant advancement in the field. Looking ahead, this method's application could extend beyond prostate cancer to other diseases, promising more nuanced understandings of disease states and potentially leading to more targeted and risk-stratified treatment approaches.

Moreover, the paper highlights the need for future work to explore the biological relevance of the identified subclusters. By combining computational analyses with biological insights, researchers can move closer to unraveling the intricate molecular mechanisms underlying cancer's development and progression.

Conclusion

The paper presents a compelling case for the use of unsupervised self-organising maps in analysing Raman spectra data from prostate cancer cells, revealing novel insights into the disease's subclustering. This approach not only enriches our understanding of prostate cancer's molecular landscape but also exemplifies the merging of computational and biological sciences to tackle some of the most pressing challenges in cancer research today. As we move forward, the continued development and application of such innovative methods will be crucial in paving the way for more effective and personalised cancer treatments.